A loss of net neutrality will mean the slow (or possibly fast) death of technology startups that deliver multimedia in the United States. Big tech firms will complain but can ultimately pay their way out of the slow lane. I mourn for the loss of America as a world leader, but I suppose this just means more of your startups will relocate up here to Canada instead.
If states or municipalities are smart, they'll get working on their own state-run Internet service provider packages to get around all this nonsense - non-metered Internet will be a tactical advantage for their state or city...
In my personal experience, the one thing my people do not tolerate well is their Internet being screwed with. So if the dire predictions come true, I can see many people trading their phones in for torches and pitchforks.
I suppose those that don't notice aren't negatively impacted enough to matter. For the rest of us, I hope the market will provide some choice, if not, then it's up to the government to eventually bust up the monopoly.Most people don't know or care how the internet works. The ISPs will not be blatant about it, they will be subtle. Because without net neutrality they don't even have to tell us they are messing with our internet. They will not stop you from watching Netflix, they will just throttle the connection about half the time so it is not in HD. The will not block Amazon, they will inject advertisements into their page and keep track of what things you are shopping for. They won't stop you from searching for something on Google, they will just re-order the search results to move their 'premium partner's' results to the top.
Most people don't know or care how the internet works. The ISPs will not be blatant about it, they will be subtle. Because without net neutrality they don't even have to tell us they are messing with our internet. They will not stop you from watching Netflix, they will just throttle the connection about half the time so it is not in HD. The will not block Amazon, they will inject advertisements into their page and keep track of what things you are shopping for. They won't stop you from searching for something on Google, they will just re-order the search results to move their 'premium partner's' results to the top.
Can you provide any evidence they did that prior to 2015?
Most people don't know or care how the internet works. The ISPs will not be blatant about it, they will be subtle. Because without net neutrality they don't even have to tell us they are messing with our internet. They will not stop you from watching Netflix, they will just throttle the connection about half the time so it is not in HD. The will not block Amazon, they will inject advertisements into their page and keep track of what things you are shopping for. They won't stop you from searching for something on Google, they will just re-order the search results to move their 'premium partner's' results to the top.
I'm not an expert, but I don't think the second two examples can happen anymore now that HTTPS is the standard. They can definitely throttle content though.
There are several ways that it can still happen. Since it is the ISP we are talking about a 'man in the middle' attack is trivial to pull off. Anyone that doesn't know how, or that they should, change what DNS server they are using is subject to DNS injection attacks.
https://arstechnica.com/information...d-every-day-because-verizon-wants-more-money/
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy...will-pay-tolls-to-more-isps-not-just-comcast/
https://arstechnica.com/information...dent-about-getting-payments-from-netflix-too/
https://www.infoworld.com/article/2925839/net-neutrality/code-injection-new-low-isps.html
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/04/how-a-banner-ad-for-hs-ok/
https://gizmodo.com/comcast-appears-to-be-injecting-browser-pop-ups-to-upse-1752633484
http://www.zdnet.com/article/are-your-search-engine-queries-being-hijacked/
You know, if it is a utility, like a street, trucks pay more licensing fees because they use more of the road. So there is that to consider as well.
It is interesting though that a lot of ISPs actually didn't engage in this practice prior to 2015 when the rules went into place.
I'll post this here and edit the original post with the link (not sure why I didn't include it before).
https://www.battleforthenet.com/
The FCC are scheduled to vote on December 14th to kill net neutrality.
Conservatives are like your asshole/stepdad dad that never let you have nice things.
That isn't because of their freedom-loving nature - they knew the hammer would come down from Obama's FCC if they monkeyed around. Now who knows what'll happen.It is interesting though that a lot of ISPs actually didn't engage in this practice prior to 2015 when the rules went into place.
mindboggling stupid why people will accept a major reduction in freedom cause big corp needs more money. I am thinking sabotage is in order. I mean like VPNs and encryption all over winkwink... Sure they may throttle me to lowest speed but at least I cut them off from sniffing my data and using it to ram ads up my arse or sell it to russia to sway an election. When they ban encryption its time crowdfund sattelite or wire your own internet 3.0
Call the FCC at 1-888-225-5322 (Option 1, option 4, option 2, option 0. You're entering a complaint on proceeding 17-108. Be polite, be concise, and be firm.). Be prepared to wait (some people claim upwards of two hour wait times). Be polite. But call them. Call your congressmen. Call your senators. Call the people who support net neutrality and tell them they have your support. Call the people who oppose net neutrality and tell them why they should change their minds.
Once entrenched, ISPs/network equipment providers will probably be able to prevent this from happening. The absolute best case scenario, is a second 'internet' would be built localized to specific areas, but interconnection between those places requires a backbone and access to DNS (some DNS), which probably ain't gonna happen easily.Mesh networks are the future.
https://techcrunch.com/2017/11/14/a...he-us-and-helps-connect-puerto-rico/?ncid=rss
The absolutely massive outpouring during the FCC comment period showed exactly what the US population wanted, and showed exactly what the govt did with that knowledge; wiped their ass with it. Petitions do nothing unless it's backed up by force, apparently.Petitions are a waste of time. Only thing that might work is throwing Republicans out in 2018 and 2020, and letting them know Net Neutrality is a reason.
This is now the third thread you've sprinkled your droppings in. Care to start just dumping it to /dev/null rather than threadcrapping?President Obama on Monday nominated Democrat Jessica Rosenworcel and Republican Ajit Varadaraj Pai to the Federal Communications Commission, bringing relatively young but experienced telecom policy experts to an agency trying to redefine itself in the Internet age
As I've been saying, Trump is just continuing Obama's bullshit or more appropriately, Trump's cabinet is. Trump is likely sitting on his ass watching Faux news, and playing golf.