Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
"Nothing" is unstable and wants to be "something". "Nothing" will occasionally turn into "something" and depending on the physics of that "something" it may be a viable universe or return to "nothing". If the universe is viable eventually everything will decay and there will again be "nothing" which will seek to become "something"
Originally posted by: chrisms
I've always wondered what complete nothingness would be like. But how could I ever comprehend such a state
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Colonel C
Please stop spamming. This is a serious thread.
How are we supposed to discuss such a vast and all-encompssing idea that for all plausible purposes on here would remain unscientific.
How do I think the universe was created?
Dillution.
Why?
I would get no solice in knowing why. It would give my life no more meaning than it already has, and would inevitable get me lost in a sea of perpetual questioning from which I woudl never escape.
Basically, asking nerds the meaning of life will not by any means yeild a answer that will satisfy you. we come from a variety of backgrounds that have cultivated into this forum enviroment that you see here, and psoing such a question to diehard technical enthusiasts is reckless at best.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: chrisms
I've always wondered what complete nothingness would be like. But how could I ever comprehend such a state
Go to Nevada and find out for yourself.
I guess that is true if by something you mean "nothing" and the physics that would accompany "nothing"Originally posted by: mjrpes3
Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
"Nothing" is unstable and wants to be "something". "Nothing" will occasionally turn into "something" and depending on the physics of that "something" it may be a viable universe or return to "nothing". If the universe is viable eventually everything will decay and there will again be "nothing" which will seek to become "something"
Nothing can never seek to be something. If there is nothing, there will always be nothing. Therefore, there is, and always has been, something.
Originally posted by: Colonel C
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Colonel C
Please stop spamming. This is a serious thread.
How are we supposed to discuss such a vast and all-encompssing idea that for all plausible purposes on here would remain unscientific.
How do I think the universe was created?
Dillution.
Why?
I would get no solice in knowing why. It would give my life no more meaning than it already has, and would inevitable get me lost in a sea of perpetual questioning from which I woudl never escape.
Basically, asking nerds the meaning of life will not by any means yeild a answer that will satisfy you. we come from a variety of backgrounds that have cultivated into this forum enviroment that you see here, and psoing such a question to diehard technical enthusiasts is reckless at best.
Alright, I suppose it was just to show my theory to everyone else. And this topic is how you think it all started.
Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
I guess that is true if by something you mean "nothing" and the physics that would accompany "nothing"Originally posted by: mjrpes3
Originally posted by: QuitBanningMe
"Nothing" is unstable and wants to be "something". "Nothing" will occasionally turn into "something" and depending on the physics of that "something" it may be a viable universe or return to "nothing". If the universe is viable eventually everything will decay and there will again be "nothing" which will seek to become "something"
Nothing can never seek to be something. If there is nothing, there will always be nothing. Therefore, there is, and always has been, something.
Originally posted by: Colonel C
Please stop spamming. This is a serious thread.
Originally posted by: PhasmatisNox
God