• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How do you think telco immunity changes politics/life as an American?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Sawyer
LAWL

So like a a complete idiot, Sawyer advocates climbing back in bed with the Republicans?????????? Because the democrats might be as bad????
Or maybe Sawyer wants a third party which ain't gonna happen either.

Sawyer may be the man, but he don't have a plan.
 
Originally posted by: Sawyer

Roffles..man you are one wound up individual, you should maybe take up pot smoking to chill.

You bet I'm wound up. Why you and every American isn't is beyond me. Maybe you should read the Constitution to see what your Traitor In Chief has stolen from the American people. 🙁

Wait a sec. You're probably the poster child left behind, and you can't read beyond a third grade level so, you wouldn't comprehend it. :roll:
 
I think your missing a point to all of this as well, most people are communicating on cell phones. Even if you on a land line it still gets converted to digital ... But it's not like the old days any more. The point is, we can store a lot of data (cell phone calls) digitally. Then with sophisticated software we they can pretty much know if your going to bomb a certain target or grow plants down in the basement. With this type of technology you should be very afraid. All in the name of terrorism. Thanks, Bush.

Not only do they have a record of what your said but they have a time and date stamp and pretty much know where you are of 5 miles of when you said it. You'd be surprised of all the crap that is said on a telephone these days. This is just the tip of the ice burg just think what they are doing with texting and email. Scary I know...

 
Originally posted by: loki8481
isn't it only retroactive immunity, with the new fisa rules superceeding for anything going forward?

It's "only" retroactive immunity that violates the prohibition in Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution against ex post facto laws.
 
I always understood it was the Libertarians who wanted to take us back in time, but sure enough, the Democrats and Republicans have a time machine to take us back exactly 24 years ago. Oh what fun.
 
"How do you think telco immunity changes politics/life as an American? "

Not a bit. Not even a little bit. No change whatsoever.

Politics will continue to be a cesspool, and it has absolutely no effect on life in America today.
 
Originally posted by: Sawyer
Hell no, I saw get rid of all the rats in Washington.

And replace them with what? A south-American style oligarchy, not elected, who runs the country? How will you stop it?
 
Why are you guys getting upset about a bill that hasnt even passed yet? Its not up for vote until after the holiday weekend....
 
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Why are you guys getting upset about a bill that hasnt even passed yet? Its not up for vote until after the holiday weekend....

Probably because it is nearly certain to pass.
 
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Why are you guys getting upset about a bill that hasnt even passed yet? Its not up for vote until after the holiday weekend....

Probably because it is nearly certain to pass.

And because our democratic leadership has betrayed the principles we expect by supporting it, and Obama has put out a statement setting the stage to vote for it.

It's usually better to discuss an issue and push your representatives *before* the vote happens... the point isn't for it to pass and then post criticism.
 
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Why are you guys getting upset about a bill that hasnt even passed yet? Its not up for vote until after the holiday weekend....

Maybe because some of us actually expect our government to obey it's own laws, and not break them?

Maybe because we feel that when you break the law, you should get punished, and not get a bunch of money and a "get out of jail free card" given to them by bought and paid for congressman?

Maybe because we don't agree with Bush's idea that he is above the law, and can ignore our very laws, the ones he is sworn to uphold?

 
Originally posted by: Craig234
Originally posted by: eskimospy
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Why are you guys getting upset about a bill that hasnt even passed yet? Its not up for vote until after the holiday weekend....

Probably because it is nearly certain to pass.

And because our democratic leadership has betrayed the principles we expect by supporting it, and Obama has put out a statement setting the stage to vote for it.

It's usually better to discuss an issue and push your representatives *before* the vote happens... the point isn't for it to pass and then post criticism.

Fair enough 🙂
 
Originally posted by: GarfieldtheCat
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Why are you guys getting upset about a bill that hasnt even passed yet? Its not up for vote until after the holiday weekend....

Maybe because some of us actually expect our government to obey it's own laws, and not break them?

Maybe because we feel that when you break the law, you should get punished, and not get a bunch of money and a "get out of jail free card" given to them by bought and paid for congressman?

Maybe because we don't agree with Bush's idea and both current presidential candidates that he is above the law, and can ignore our very laws, the ones he is sworn to uphold?

Fixed for accuracy. Until the people of the US elect those who create these bills to actually do the right thing, we'll have more of the same. Once again it's the Senate's fault, not the presidents. No bill, no law.
 
Originally posted by: blackangst1

Fixed for accuracy. Until the people of the US elect those who create these bills to actually do the right thing, we'll have more of the same. Once again it's the Senate's fault, not the presidents. No bill, no law.

No, it's both of their faults. No presidential signature, no law. No presidential agitation for this legislation, no law. In fact, no massive illegal warrantless wiretapping program by the president, almost certainly no law.
 
Originally posted by: eskimospy

No presidential signature, no law. No presidential agitation for this legislation, no law. In fact, no massive illegal warrantless wiretapping program by the president, almost certainly no law.

Also, no illegal war of lies, no treason, shredding of U.S. Constitution, no war crimes, no crimes against humanity, no war profiteering, NO SHIT! :|
 
Originally posted by: Harvey
Originally posted by: eskimospy

No presidential signature, no law. No presidential agitation for this legislation, no law. In fact, no massive illegal warrantless wiretapping program by the president, almost certainly no law.

Also, no illegal war of lies, no treason, shredding of U.S. Constitution, no war crimes, no crimes against humanity, no war profiteering, NO SHIT! :|

Can you respond to the topic ya blind partisan ass?
 
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: GarfieldtheCat
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Why are you guys getting upset about a bill that hasnt even passed yet? Its not up for vote until after the holiday weekend....

Maybe because some of us actually expect our government to obey it's own laws, and not break them?

Maybe because we feel that when you break the law, you should get punished, and not get a bunch of money and a "get out of jail free card" given to them by bought and paid for congressman?

Maybe because we don't agree with Bush's idea and both current presidential candidates that he is above the law, and can ignore our very laws, the ones he is sworn to uphold?

Fixed for accuracy. Until the people of the US elect those who create these bills to actually do the right thing, we'll have more of the same. Once again it's the Senate's fault, not the presidents. No bill, no law.

I agree partially, but ultimately, the fault lies with Bush. His idea that he can break the law, and can do what he wants doesn't require anything from Congress. And his admin's constant willingness to break the law, and conceal it behind "national security" is all his fault. He ordered the law to be broken, not Congress.

Congress has failed to smack the shit out of him (figuratively speaking) and stopped this kind of abuse. And for the most part, they have gone right along with him, but it was/is still his decisions.
 
Back
Top