Small background: This is an online course from a state university. My major is economics and this course is a requirement for the school of business, it is called "Business and Developing Countries."
For some reason we started studying memes, and have moved onto Thomas Kuhn. In his lecture provided to us in a wordpad document, he cited wikipedia as his only reference. He follows up with this:
This is not my first course, but this is the first time a teacher has directed me to read wikipedia and amazon as first sources for study of a subject.
Now onto the fun part, the basis of the lecture is that our life is full of paradigms which are models of thought. And that instead of progressing in a steady incremental pattern, we have periodic revolutions. He got the first part right when he said that Kuhn said that science does not evolve gradually. However, my teacher has expanded this to cover non scientific areas, which is where I believe he is wrong. At first I thought Kuhn was a loon, but I followed up with some further reading Stanford Encyclopeida of Philosophy. It turns out that (I believe) Kuhn's thesis of paradigm shifts is limited to scientific progress and that he never said anything about paradigm shifts outside of that area. The reasons I think my teacher is wrong is he gives three examples of paradigm shifts:
A. Higher education is moving from classroom based to internet based.
B. Physical Science, The move from Ptolemies theory of earth centered orbit, to the current theory of sun centered orbit.
C. Management theories, the move from central decision making to more lower level decision making and the empowering of employees.
Only the second example is even science based as he related it, but it still seems to be smaller than the actual paradigm shifts Kuhn refers to.
I am currently writing my response, and I was hoping to get a few ideas about how to do this in a more tactful manner and say that the lecture was way off base. Also, if anyone is familiar with Thomas Kuhn, and could provide me with more information, either in support of my view, or to prove that I am off my rocker I would appreciate it.
Also, I do not have access to Thomas Kuhn's book so I am unfortunately forced to make my argument without being able to read the work. And, the response is due by saturday, which does not give me enough time to read his work and form a good opinion on my own reading in time if I had it.
For some reason we started studying memes, and have moved onto Thomas Kuhn. In his lecture provided to us in a wordpad document, he cited wikipedia as his only reference. He follows up with this:
You can, of course, read Thomas Kuhn?s book, but for this class we can get the essence of his work and various perspectives on it by visiting the following two sites:
1. A brief biography of Thomas Kuhn. Either site will give you an overview of who Thomas Kuhn was, and his basic approach to life.
http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/Kuhnsnap.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Samuel_Kuhn
2. Summary and critiques of his work. The Amazon.com site has good summaries of his work, as well as insightful critiques. Read all of the editorial reviews, and scroll down and read all 80 of the reader reviews. Search on "Thomas Kuhn." On the Amazon site.
http://www.amazon.com/
This is not my first course, but this is the first time a teacher has directed me to read wikipedia and amazon as first sources for study of a subject.
Now onto the fun part, the basis of the lecture is that our life is full of paradigms which are models of thought. And that instead of progressing in a steady incremental pattern, we have periodic revolutions. He got the first part right when he said that Kuhn said that science does not evolve gradually. However, my teacher has expanded this to cover non scientific areas, which is where I believe he is wrong. At first I thought Kuhn was a loon, but I followed up with some further reading Stanford Encyclopeida of Philosophy. It turns out that (I believe) Kuhn's thesis of paradigm shifts is limited to scientific progress and that he never said anything about paradigm shifts outside of that area. The reasons I think my teacher is wrong is he gives three examples of paradigm shifts:
A. Higher education is moving from classroom based to internet based.
B. Physical Science, The move from Ptolemies theory of earth centered orbit, to the current theory of sun centered orbit.
C. Management theories, the move from central decision making to more lower level decision making and the empowering of employees.
Only the second example is even science based as he related it, but it still seems to be smaller than the actual paradigm shifts Kuhn refers to.
I am currently writing my response, and I was hoping to get a few ideas about how to do this in a more tactful manner and say that the lecture was way off base. Also, if anyone is familiar with Thomas Kuhn, and could provide me with more information, either in support of my view, or to prove that I am off my rocker I would appreciate it.
Also, I do not have access to Thomas Kuhn's book so I am unfortunately forced to make my argument without being able to read the work. And, the response is due by saturday, which does not give me enough time to read his work and form a good opinion on my own reading in time if I had it.
