Originally posted by: JackBurton
"Bacon tastes gooood. Pork chops taste gooood."
Butter up that bacon, boy!
Now bacon up that sausage!
But dad, my heart hurts!
Originally posted by: JackBurton
"Bacon tastes gooood. Pork chops taste gooood."
Butter up that bacon, boy!
Now bacon up that sausage!
But dad, my heart hurts!
Originally posted by: thirtythree
I don't think those things have much to do with ethics. e.g., "Why did you kill and eat that child?" "It made me happy, plus the child was tasty."
Originally posted by: nkgreen
Originally posted by: thirtythree
I don't think those things have much to do with ethics. e.g., "Why did you kill and eat that child?" "It made me happy, plus the child was tasty."
You can't compare a child to a cow. Why are there animals if we shouldn't eat them? Animals eat other animals, and we're animals, so what's the problem?
Originally posted by: thirtythree
So I'm in the process of going vegan. While I'm sure it would be less work not to be vegan, I haven't come across any arguments that would justify consuming animals when I don't need to. What do you think?
Originally posted by: thirtythree
So I'm in the process of going meataterian. While I'm sure it would be less work not to be a meataterian, I haven't come across any arguments that would justify consuming vegetables when I don't need to. What do you think?
Originally posted by: thirtythree
So I'm in the process of going vegan. While I'm sure it would be less work not to be vegan, I haven't come across any arguments that would justify consuming animals when I don't need to. What do you think?
Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Your strawberries are colored red with the blood of the workers.
Originally posted by: thirtythree
So I'm in the process of going vegan. While I'm sure it would be less work not to be vegan, I haven't come across any arguments that would justify consuming animals when I don't need to. What do you think?
Exactly. Is the OP going to avoid (at all costs) fruits and vegetables where humans were exploited to produce said fruits and vegatables here and abroad?Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
You exploit underpaid, uninsured migrant workers with no retirment plan to produce your ftuits and veggies. Your strawberries are colored red with the blood of the workers.
Originally posted by: So
I will not consume any animal that can recognize the immorality of eating me. Therefore, everything is fair game except maybe dolphins and chimpanzees, and I don't trust chimps...
See my reply to RaistlinZ above for your last question. Why can't I compare a child to a cow? How about a severely retarded child? Why don't we eat them and test on them? Drawing the line at our species seems pretty arbitrary. It's the fact that severely retarded individuals are sentient beings that makes us give consideration to their needs.Originally posted by: nkgreen
Originally posted by: thirtythree
I don't think those things have much to do with ethics. e.g., "Why did you kill and eat that child?" "It made me happy, plus the child was tasty."
You can't compare a child to a cow. Why are there animals if we shouldn't eat them? Animals eat other animals, and we're animals, so what's the problem?
I try to keep my consumption to a minimum. Granted, there's always more to do, but the fact that I can't minimize harm completely doesn't mean I shouldn't try to minimize it at all. I do buy cheap clothes. What does that have to do with anything?Originally posted by: Taejin
Originally posted by: thirtythree
So I'm in the process of going vegan. While I'm sure it would be less work not to be vegan, I haven't come across any arguments that would justify consuming animals when I don't need to. What do you think?
What justification is there for you to buy anything but the cheapest clothes? Why don't you go live in a log cabin and live off beans only? Do you have any idea the impact you make on innocent animals and their habitats simply by being a modern human being?
Well, I feel farming as you describe it is a step above where most of our animal products come from. However, I've read some interesting philosophical books on the subject, and I still can't find much justification for breeding, controlling, and killing animals. I live in Salt Lake City, which is supposedly a city rather than a suburb, and I was never emo. I'm not really the trendy type. In fact, I don't really know any vegans.Originally posted by: Captain Howdy
By living a life of minimal regrets and just trying to be a good person day to day. Not having any mythical savior helps. I live on an organic farm and my diet does not contain lots of animals, but most of the "animal product" I consume is from animals I encounter frequently. The goats don't seem to mind that I am grabbing their milk when I don't need it. The chickens peck and eat their own eggs if I don't grab them quick enough. I humanely kill the turkeys and chickens when it is time. I am going to take a guess that you live in the suburbs somewhere and just fell into this vegan movement because you realized how wankster the emo movement is?
If not, more power to you, but I think it is very misguided. If anything, you should be against highly processed foods, as that is what the bottom of the barrel society is sustaining itself on.
True, but the same is true of the meatpacking industry. I don't know enough about the two industries to make comparisons, but I'm open to any facts you can dig up.Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Originally posted by: thirtythree
So I'm in the process of going vegan. While I'm sure it would be less work not to be vegan, I haven't come across any arguments that would justify consuming animals when I don't need to. What do you think?
I just prefer to eat meat, and in moderation it can be part of a healthy diet. An omnivorous diet is natural for humans and no more or less ethical than a vegan one.
You exploit underpaid, uninsured migrant workers with no retirment plan to produce your ftuits and veggies. Your strawberries are colored red with the blood of the workers.
That's a pretty silly argument. Plants can be easily sustained, and feeding fewer animals means consuming fewer plants. Granted, animals can perhaps also be sustained, but that involves breeding billions of sentient animals so we can use them and kill them for profit.Originally posted by: Chiropteran
You vegans are all sickos. You claim to care about all living things, yet you devour the very plants that make life possible on this planet. If you really wanted to mkae a positive ecological difference, you would photosynthesize your own energy directly from sunlight.
If the vegans had their way, there wouldn't be any plants left at all. And we would ALL die. At least carnivores only animals.
See, kill the plants and you kill everything, because the plants are at the bottom of the food chain.
Kill a cow, and nobody really suffers because there aren't any animals that rely on eating cows to survive.
TL;DR: Vegans are terrorists.
It's a pretty good answer.Originally posted by: Jeff7
I think it's not so much justification as it is rationalization. We rationalize that we are better than animals, and that that superiority in some sense also means that we can deprive them of life on only the basis of our own whims. If we didn't rationalize it, we'd all feel horrible for killing animals for food, and of course, the practice would soon stop.
It's interesting too how we assign value to certain animals, but not others. Save the whales! Kill the cows! Save dolphins! Eat tuna! Keep kittens as pets, but eat pigs. Or keep pigs as pets.
I generally don't eat much meat, and I find that preparing it can be rather unpleasant, because ever-present is the knowledge that I'm cooking and eating some chunk of what was once a live animal. But damn, roasted chicken is indeed damn tasty.
I look forward to a time when they can finally just grow animal muscle tissue in a clean environment - just the muscles, being grown in some kind of nutrient solution, and totally free of parasites. Want your steak to be ultra-rare or borderline raw? Hey, no problem, it's safe.
So how's that for a nice, ambiguous answer?![]()
I don't claim that I can cut down on all suffering, but I can at least minimize it to the best of my abilities. I haven't read as much about human labor, but boycotting their products isn't necessarily the answer. Lemme see if I can find an interesting article I read about it...Originally posted by: her209
Exactly. Is the OP going to avoid (at all costs) fruits and vegetables where humans were exploited to produce said fruits and vegatables here and abroad?Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
You exploit underpaid, uninsured migrant workers with no retirment plan to produce your ftuits and veggies. Your strawberries are colored red with the blood of the workers.
Originally posted by: Wheezer
Originally posted by: So
I will not consume any animal that can recognize the immorality of eating me. Therefore, everything is fair game except maybe dolphins and chimpanzees, and I don't trust chimps...
:thumbsup:
Originally posted by: thirtythree
It may be natural for certain animals to forcibly have sex with females, but not so for humans.
Originally posted by: thirtythree
See my reply to RaistlinZ above for your last question. Why can't I compare a child to a cow? How about a severely retarded child? Why don't we eat them and test on them? Drawing the line at our species seems pretty arbitrary. It's the fact that severely retarded individuals are sentient beings that makes us give consideration to their needs.Originally posted by: nkgreen
Originally posted by: thirtythree
I don't think those things have much to do with ethics. e.g., "Why did you kill and eat that child?" "It made me happy, plus the child was tasty."
You can't compare a child to a cow. Why are there animals if we shouldn't eat them? Animals eat other animals, and we're animals, so what's the problem?
That's an interested argument. I suppose if you think of it that way, it comes down to what one considers a sound purpose. To me, saving myself the trouble of going vegan doesn't seem like a sound purpose for using and killing animals. In my mind, convenience has very little to do with ethics. I disagree that sentience doesn't call for some level of reverence for animals--you wouldn't say it's fine to torture animals for fun, for example, would you? Using them for our needs is another matter, but using them is no longer a need.Originally posted by: nkgreen
I don't see how you can have a moral argument for killing animals for a sound purpose if you accept that humans > other animals.
