10s were easy so I would do....
10 x 16 = 160
8 x 10 = 80
8 x 6 = 48
288
Did you memorize the bigger number multiplying the smaller number or just the smaller number multiplying the bigger number?
Example:
Did you memorize 8 x 4? Or did you only memorize 4 x 8?
I learned with tables and flash cards. Nothing about order, except to simplify few digits * many digits.Did you memorize the bigger number multiplying the smaller number or just the smaller number multiplying the bigger number?
Example:
Did you memorize 8 x 4? Or did you only memorize 4 x 8?
I would do 16^2+16*2, since I know the low powers of 2.I would do 16x20 - 32 personally.
I never could manage the tricks like that, because they would either lead me off by a digit, or not work every time. I just did it longhand. I didn't see how they saved much time, either, since the paper was just to keep place, not actually do all the work. In college, I could use the calculator much less than up through HS (however, a calculator that could load programs that could do symbolic solving was a requirement, so...).grade school.
![]()
high school
![]()
College.
![]()
A teacher taught me to put the bigger number on top and smaller one below. So it was a vertical format like this without the "0"s
008
x04
------
32
But she's dead now I think because I'm an old guy and she looked kinda old as I remember so she's gotta be dead by now.
Convert the umber to binary and then multiply.
I would take a slightly different approach:
18x16
= 20x16 - 2x16
= 320 - 32
= 320 - 30 - 2
= 290 - 2
= 288