How come nvidia had nothing to show at Computex??

piesquared

Golden Member
Oct 16, 2006
1,651
473
136
Was NVidia even there?? Have they run out of products (or in Titanzzzz's case, vapourware), to show off? Not even a mention of anything NV it seems. What gives??
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Didn't they win a Computex Best Choice award, breaking a record for most consecutive years?

Certainly they sent someone to accept it.....
 

KaRLiToS

Golden Member
Jul 30, 2010
1,918
11
81
GK110 is 2 years old.

Nothing to show off, but they have something to hide though ... a dual GK110 failure.
 

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
Nothing to show off, but they have something to hide though ... a dual GK110 failure.

I don't know, I think powering the control screen of the next ship to take NASA astronauts into space is pretty cool.

v2_interior_wide.png


http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/06/03/spacex-brings-tegra/
 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
I heard ICs used in space are ancient obsolete tech, on very old manufacturing nodes (high nm) because anything on a small node with fast transistors & high performance will be very prone to interference from cosmic rays...

They use to fly the shuttle with Texas Instrument calculators, essentially. :D
 

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,250
136
I don't know, I think powering the control screen of the next ship to take NASA astronauts into space is pretty cool.

v2_interior_wide.png


http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/06/03/spacex-brings-tegra/


Musk told Ars that, like the Tesla S’ touch screen, Nvidia SoCs will power the graphics on the Dragon V2 (although those chips won’t power the rest of the systems on the spaceship, Musk clarified, laughing).
It's nothing more than a touch interface involvement. It's not like the fate of those onboard lives are in the hands of NVidia.
 
Last edited:

OCGuy

Lifer
Jul 12, 2000
27,224
37
91
It's nothing more than a touch interface involvement. It's not like the fait of those onboard lives are in the hands of NVidia.

True. It certainly isn't as interesting as a redundant programming interface, but still worth a read.
 

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,250
136
True. It certainly isn't as interesting as a redundant programming interface, but still worth a read.

It did make me search for cpus in space. The reads there are far more interesting to me.
 
Feb 19, 2009
10,457
10
76
It did make me search for cpus in space. The reads there are far more interesting to me.

Yup, its amazing how slow the CPUs are run at, often on very old nodes, to prevent damage from cosmic rays. So the engineers get so much out of so little processing available to them.
 

Bateluer

Lifer
Jun 23, 2001
27,730
8
0
Not much to show off when they're still using 2 year old core designs on an extremely mature manufacturing process.
 

tviceman

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2008
6,734
514
126
www.facebook.com
Ubisoft is such a terrible dev to partner up with. Between uplay and the generally horrible performance their games have on PC, I'd rather see Nvidia tie the knot with a more consistent develope, and one where they might put pressure on getting PC releases (2k, ahem rockstar).
 

BrightCandle

Diamond Member
Mar 15, 2007
4,762
0
76
As far as I know the Shuttle is still on 80386's which is radiation hardened as its actual mission CPU, which is fast enough for the basic control of the aircraft for take off and landing.

The thing to understand is that aircraft and shuttles have an avionics bay. This can contain quite a lot of computers in general, all serving different functions. Some might be managing the display output and others the engine control or in the case of the shuttle we have a landing and take off auto pilot mission computer that is also calculating controlled burns for orbital interceptions. The black box is another example of one of these avionics boxes, the main difference obviously being rather than computing resources its mostly the hard fire proof coating and storage and accurate timing mechanisms internally.

So the fact that Nvidia has Tegra running the control screen is actually quite significant. That is safety critical aspect of the shuttle and it would be classed as risk class 4 or SIL 1 component of the shuttle (the highest risk level needing the most stringent of testing). Input and output control is not something that doesn't matter, its absolutely critical and suggests Tegra with appropriate hardening is a very reliable processor. It takes quite a lot of computing power to draw screens and even more to do it in a safety critical way.

Not very interesting for most people here but I find the inclusion of such a processor in the capsule interesting.
 

Kenmitch

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,505
2,250
136
As far as I know the Shuttle is still on 80386's which is radiation hardened as its actual mission CPU, which is fast enough for the basic control of the aircraft for take off and landing.

The thing to understand is that aircraft and shuttles have an avionics bay. This can contain quite a lot of computers in general, all serving different functions. Some might be managing the display output and others the engine control or in the case of the shuttle we have a landing and take off auto pilot mission computer that is also calculating controlled burns for orbital interceptions. The black box is another example of one of these avionics boxes, the main difference obviously being rather than computing resources its mostly the hard fire proof coating and storage and accurate timing mechanisms internally.

So the fact that Nvidia has Tegra running the control screen is actually quite significant. That is safety critical aspect of the shuttle and it would be classed as risk class 4 or SIL 1 component of the shuttle (the highest risk level needing the most stringent of testing). Input and output control is not something that doesn't matter, its absolutely critical and suggests Tegra with appropriate hardening is a very reliable processor. It takes quite a lot of computing power to draw screens and even more to do it in a safety critical way.

Not very interesting for most people here but I find the inclusion of such a processor in the capsule interesting.

The launch looks to be a couple years away still....It is interesting I guess.

Two years is a long time in the hardware world so it's hard to say if it'll actually be used at that time.



LL


2043264


The monitor partners are the ones presenting them, it seems. This is the Acer 4k w/ G-Sync.

http://www.techspot.com/news/56990-eyes-on-with-acers-g-sync-enabled-4k-monitor-at-computex.html

Maybe to move some TitanZ's they should include a G-Syn monitor for free....There looks to be plenty of markup on them so I'd think they could do it. Maybe not a 4k offering tho.
 

exar333

Diamond Member
Feb 7, 2004
8,518
8
91
Showing nothing is preferable to bringing-out a cardboard card though, right? ;)

*ducks for cover*