- Oct 16, 2006
 
- 1,651
 
- 473
 
- 136
 
Was NVidia even there?? Have they run out of products (or in Titanzzzz's case, vapourware), to show off? Not even a mention of anything NV it seems. What gives??
			
			Nothing to show off, but they have something to hide though ... a dual GK110 failure.
	I don't know, I think powering the control screen of the next ship to take NASA astronauts into space is pretty cool.
![]()
http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/06/03/spacex-brings-tegra/
It's nothing more than a touch interface involvement. It's not like the fate of those onboard lives are in the hands of NVidia.Musk told Ars that, like the Tesla S’ touch screen, Nvidia SoCs will power the graphics on the Dragon V2 (although those chips won’t power the rest of the systems on the spaceship, Musk clarified, laughing).
So basically, it's nothing. I wonder what they use for their CPUs.
It's nothing more than a touch interface involvement. It's not like the fait of those onboard lives are in the hands of NVidia.
True. It certainly isn't as interesting as a redundant programming interface, but still worth a read.
It did make me search for cpus in space. The reads there are far more interesting to me.
	
	![]()
Say hello to my little friend: NVIDIA's Tom Petersen announced a Titan Z giveaway
I don't know, I think powering the control screen of the next ship to take NASA astronauts into space is pretty cool.
![]()
http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/06/03/spacex-brings-tegra/
I was expecting G-Sync production models on exhibit.
As far as I know the Shuttle is still on 80386's which is radiation hardened as its actual mission CPU, which is fast enough for the basic control of the aircraft for take off and landing.
The thing to understand is that aircraft and shuttles have an avionics bay. This can contain quite a lot of computers in general, all serving different functions. Some might be managing the display output and others the engine control or in the case of the shuttle we have a landing and take off auto pilot mission computer that is also calculating controlled burns for orbital interceptions. The black box is another example of one of these avionics boxes, the main difference obviously being rather than computing resources its mostly the hard fire proof coating and storage and accurate timing mechanisms internally.
So the fact that Nvidia has Tegra running the control screen is actually quite significant. That is safety critical aspect of the shuttle and it would be classed as risk class 4 or SIL 1 component of the shuttle (the highest risk level needing the most stringent of testing). Input and output control is not something that doesn't matter, its absolutely critical and suggests Tegra with appropriate hardening is a very reliable processor. It takes quite a lot of computing power to draw screens and even more to do it in a safety critical way.
Not very interesting for most people here but I find the inclusion of such a processor in the capsule interesting.
![]()
![]()
The monitor partners are the ones presenting them, it seems. This is the Acer 4k w/ G-Sync.
http://www.techspot.com/news/56990-eyes-on-with-acers-g-sync-enabled-4k-monitor-at-computex.html
