How can the US legally how Saddam prisoner?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

dababus

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,555
0
0
wow, surprise,

you didn't see Bill o reilly here, or some sean and hannity colmes of fox news
 

dababus

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,555
0
0
hahahahah

you are ignorant fvckwad GI JOE. HAHAHAHAH.

you are reaffirming my belief that this country is full of idiots like you.

hahaha.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Pakistan propped up the Taliban to provide an influx of prostitutes into Islamabad. It's a well known fact. Many of the prostitutes were children, which were needed to provide a needed population boost in Pakistan because of the recent mass stonings and executions of children for eating candy in the streets. It's a well known fact.
 

burnedout

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,249
2
0
Originally posted by: dababus
wow, surprise,

you didn't see Bill o reilly here, or some sean and hannity colmes of fox news
Um no, sorry, Jihadi, but I listen to neither "o reilly" nor "some sean and hannity colmes of fox news". However, I do in fact read peer-review journals. And you? Do you rely on conspiracy websites and teachings from the Madrassa?

Try some real academic literature sometime, Jihadi. Expand your wretched little mind for a change.
 

dababus

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,555
0
0
Pakistan propped up the Taliban to provide an influx of prostitutes into Islamabad. It's a well known fact. Many of the prostitutes were children, which were needed to provide a needed population boost in Pakistan because of the recent mass stonings and executions of children for eating candy in the streets. It's a well known fact.

hahahah

you are full of $hit like a fvcking christmas goose, and that's a well known fact.

hhahahha.

what a dip $hit.

hahahahhahahhaha.
 

dababus

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,555
0
0
conspiracy.

my ass.

what is conspiracy.

just because you don't believe in it, it doesn't mean its conspiracy

peer review journals.

name one, you limp dick.

may be you need to start looking outside of the box.
 

CanOWorms

Lifer
Jul 3, 2001
12,404
2
0
Originally posted by: dababus
Pakistan propped up the Taliban to provide an influx of prostitutes into Islamabad. It's a well known fact. Many of the prostitutes were children, which were needed to provide a needed population boost in Pakistan because of the recent mass stonings and executions of children for eating candy in the streets. It's a well known fact.

hahahah

you are full of $hit like a fvcking christmas goose, and that's a well known fact.

hhahahha.

what a dip $hit.

hahahahhahahhaha.

OMG, how can you deny it? It's out in the open, not even any sort of conspiracy theory. Last weekend, everyone who is anyone in Pakistain was seen congregating in Islamabad and all the prostitutes were busy, none on the streets. A lot of mothers and fathers were even wondering where their children were. A special UN team is investigating.
 

burnedout

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,249
2
0
Originally posted by: dababus
conspiracy.
Ah yes, Jihadi blesses us again with such eloquently worded, intellectual discourse! But to answer such feeble-minded questioning, Jihadi, you might want to look at Journal of Palestinian Studies or the Journal of Modern History. Try that sometime, so we won't be forced to feel sorry for the comprehensive ignorance you so thoughtfully display here.
 

Shad0hawK

Banned
May 26, 2003
1,456
0
0
Originally posted by: dababus
Pakistan propped up the Taliban to provide an influx of prostitutes into Islamabad. It's a well known fact. Many of the prostitutes were children, which were needed to provide a needed population boost in Pakistan because of the recent mass stonings and executions of children for eating candy in the streets. It's a well known fact.

hahahah

you are full of $hit like a fvcking christmas goose, and that's a well known fact.

hhahahha.

what a dip $hit.

hahahahhahahhaha.

i just have to ask dababus, how old are you?

i see your quoting socialist sources for your materiel, and i keep noticing an amazing coincedence.

the only people that seem upset saddam is gone are socialists, is it because saddam was a socialist too?

here is homepage of the party saddam ran in iraq..of course there is not much mention of saddam in the Baath Socilist Party these days.





 

dababus

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,555
0
0
i have to ask you how old are you.

also, the issue of taliban and saddam are not same issues.

what connection are you trying to make here. your socialist connections are not just weak but totally out of question.

 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
Originally posted by: dababus
the US still holds noreiga the president of panama still in prison, without any case, or trial and has never given him a chance to get interviewed by the outside world.

so what do you think about that. you see you answered your question yourself. :)

You are wrong and apparently nothing more than a troll. I see no reason to try and have a discussion with you when you can't even get basic facts correct.


Bye, don't let the door.....

 

dababus

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,555
0
0
no you are wrong, trial for people who work for you and when they go out of line and start being independent, the US invades the country, carpet bomb Panama and just to get one guy and then file drug trafficking charges against him, when they knew all along about his past.

sorry, you are wrong. you are no better than all the retards who are not accepting the fact how corrupt the US govt is.

well the door is open for you, good bye.
 

dababus

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,555
0
0
basic facts!!!

did you admit that noreiga was involved with drug trafficking with full knowledge of US in 70's and nothing was done about him.

even some one with that kind of record is set up as dictator with the help of CIA and that's all ok as long as the dog doesn't bark at his master.

well you can't get the basic facts rights, so its worth to waste my time with you.

so please step the fvck off.

 

dababus

Platinum Member
Apr 11, 2000
2,555
0
0
Trial for deeds that US knew he was committing under the US nose.

learn the whole story.

you were wrong and will always be wrong as long as you keep believing the US government and will never question your government.

Goodbye.
 

Shad0hawK

Banned
May 26, 2003
1,456
0
0
Originally posted by: dababus
i have to ask you how old are you.

also, the issue of taliban and saddam are not same issues.

what connection are you trying to make here. your socialist connections are not just weak but totally out of question.


i am 36. how old were you gain? i must ahve missed it.

the taliban have nothing to do with the baath socialist party, saddam as a member and party leader in iraq however, does(or DID). i never mentioned the taliban, are you even on the same planet the rest of us are on?

actually they are spot on want to see more on socialist saddam?

dababus, do you have nay idea what the $%^@$ your talking about? your sophomoricism while entertaining is almost sad. i am starting to pity you.




 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
Originally posted by: dababus
Trial for deeds that US knew he was committing under the US nose.

learn the whole story.

you were wrong and will always be wrong as long as you keep believing the US government and will never question your government.

Goodbye.


I'm curious, who brainwashed you or in other words, where did you get what you have of an education?
 

rchiu

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2002
3,846
0
0
Originally posted by: dababus
Trial for deeds that US knew he was committing under the US nose.

learn the whole story.

you were wrong and will always be wrong as long as you keep believing the US government and will never question your government.

Goodbye.

Keep up the good fight...Both Noriega and Hussien are tools of US government, when they serves the US purpose, US government provided them with anything they wanted including weapons used to commit so many of their crimes. When they don't serve the US purpose, US government them put in this sorry excuse of a trial in a biased court with biased judges.

Yeap, in 1984 when Iraq was gassing Iranian soldiers left and right, Rumsfeld visited Iraq under Ronald Reagan's authority and discussed "topics of mutual interest". A now 20 years later when Iraq don't even have so called WMD, the US government is accusing Hussien of crime against humanity......yeah, what a total BS.

 

etech

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
10,597
0
0
Originally posted by: rchiu
Originally posted by: dababus
Trial for deeds that US knew he was committing under the US nose.

learn the whole story.

you were wrong and will always be wrong as long as you keep believing the US government and will never question your government.

Goodbye.

Keep up the good fight...Both Noriega and Hussien are tools of US government, when they serves the US purpose, US government provided them with anything they wanted including weapons used to commit so many of their crimes. When they don't serve the US purpose, US government them put in this sorry excuse of a trial in a biased court with biased judges.

Yeap, in 1984 when Iraq was gassing Iranian soldiers left and right, Rumsfeld visited Iraq under Ronald Reagan's authority and discussed "topics of mutual interest". A now 20 years later when Iraq don't even have so called WMD, the US government is accusing Hussien of crime against humanity......yeah, what a total BS.

Did you even read what you posted?

" Iraq was gassing Iranian soldiers left and right"
"US government is accusing Hussien of crime against humanity......yeah, what a total BS."

So by your reasoning, using chemical weapons is just fine and dandy. Now what you wrote is complete BS. You obviously don't know the history of that relationship and do not understand how or why a country may hold its nose and cooperate with an unsavory character to deal with a greater threat yet at the same time not condone or approve of ALL of his actions. At least no US leader called Saddam a close and personal friend. Guess who that was.