How can anyone be this "horny" ?

[conjur]

Lithium and/or Lobotomy

 

[TheBlondOne]

That is awful...

I hope they lock him up and get him some serious therapy. I wonder what his home life was like.....

unreal.

--Sarah

 

[Brutuskend]

<< permanent placement >>



Home for the criminally insane!

This "KID" obviously has mental problems, and should be taken off the streets permanently.

 

[SerraYX]

<< A "psych eval"?! What planet are you on? This kid needs to have the living crap kicked out of him to teach him right from wrong. If that doesn't work, he needs to be permanently removed from society. >>



I doubt he purposely believes these things are the "correct" things to do in society. Would you like to be tortured for something you couldn't control?

 

[htmlmasterdave]

AHAHAHAHAH!



<< Jail time should teach him, but his corn hole might a bit too small to take that kinda punishment.

Seriously, Its a tuff decision. >>

 

[glenn1]

<< Astaroth33,

read the following quotes and think about them for a while:

"Punishment does not equal justice."
"Just behaviour or treatment can only be accomplished through understanding."
"Punishment is the embodiment of a society's unability to deal with those who chose to disobey the rules set by the society."
"Ignorance is not being willing to learn when encountering something which can not be explained." >>



Your so-called "compassion" has blinded you to even the slightest hint of common sense it seems. Certain people in this world grow up to be dangerous sociopaths, just as some dogs become dangerous rabid beasts. Of course, i suppose the "compassionate" thing to do would be to sit down with Fido, and ask him about his puppyhood, and why he feels the need to be rabid. The truly compassionate thing to do with those who, for whatever reason, be it severe mental disturbances, poor parenting, or just being an evil person, cannot live in a civilized society without presenting a manifest danger to others, is to remove them from civilized society.

You remind me of the type who would argue that someone like Stalin or Pol Pot wasn't really evil, just misguided, and just needed a big hug to see the error of their ways. Why don't you for once in your life stand up and say that people are responsible for their actions, and that actions have consequences? Stop trying to justify and minimize the evil that some people are, because you don't feel that it's "right" to judge them. Normal, just, compassionate people judge others and their actions all the time. It's only the cowards who refuse to believe that real evil exists in this world, and that when it does rear its ugly head, that those who commit it aren't really responsible... it must have been bad parenting, peer pressure, whatever. Stand up and be a man, and admit that character actually does matter, and that compassionate men in a civilized society have the right, indeed the obligation, to insist upon civilized conduct from its members, and have the right to punish those who do not comply.

This kid belongs in a mental institution, jail, or death row... and perhaps all of them, in that order.

 

[NewCompGeek]

Dude man... that's freakin' disturbing.

 

[bootymac]

:Q

chop off his wee wee!

 

[Elledan]

<< Your so-called "compassion" has blinded you to even the slightest hint of common sense it seems. Certain people in this world grow up to be dangerous sociopaths, just as some dogs become dangerous rabid beasts. Of course, i suppose the "compassionate" thing to do would be to sit down with Fido, and ask him about his puppyhood, and why he feels the need to be rabid. The truly compassionate thing to do with those who, for whatever reason, be it severe mental disturbances, poor parenting, or just being an evil person, cannot live in a civilized society without presenting a manifest danger to others, is to remove them from civilized society. >>


Either you're extremely dense, or you're talking to the wrong person.

I explained before what the most logical approach is and so I'll try again:

Such an individual as this boy can not function in a society. He must not be allowed to enter society again until he's capable of functioning normally.

I guess we all can agree on that part, no?

Now, we've got this individual removed from society, now what? The only logical choice would be to do some research on why exactly this individual 'malfunctioned', by studying his brain-chemistry, firing patterns, his upbringing and environment and many, many more variables.

If we would do this with many more individuals who also 'malfunction', we would gain a gigantic amount of information. Other areas of science, like neuroscience would benefit as well.

Using this information we can start looking for a cure or treatment. If we find one, and once it has proven to be effective, the individual can take his or her place again in society.

If a cure or treatment can not be found for an individual, s/he will spend the rest of his or her days as a research objects and will never again be allowed to return to society.


This course of action is not based on compassion, cruelty etc., but on logic only.

 

[Tripleshot]

He is in the system and should be a ward of the state. Under that control,he should be detained and removed from society and placed under supervision and care of metal health officials. From that,he can be evaluated as to his needs,not society's needs. he is still a child and is accorded that protection.

If he is released to the public,then the citizens should be doing something about it, legally. If he was my neighbor and the state knowingly allowed him to roam without supervision and he became a threat to me,my family,or my property, I would just kill the little sh!t and let the courts settle it. The state is responsible for this kid. If they don't take care of it,a citizen can.

Simple solutions do not exist for this scenerio.

 

<< If we would do this with many more individuals who also 'malfunction', we would gain a gigantic amount of information. Other areas of science, like neuroscience would benefit as well. >>


They do, and have been for years and years. We humans are just not smart enough to understand our own brains.

So I say turn him into a lab rat.

 

[gogeeta13]

<<

<< If we would do this with many more individuals who also 'malfunction', we would gain a gigantic amount of information. Other areas of science, like neuroscience would benefit as well. >>


They do, and have been for years and years. We humans are just not smart enough to understand our own brains.

So I say turn him into a lab rat. >>



Amen to that, this turd is lower than a white lab rat, way lower.. Hmm, I do need a new rug..

 

[Elledan]

<<

<< If we would do this with many more individuals who also 'malfunction', we would gain a gigantic amount of information. Other areas of science, like neuroscience would benefit as well. >>


They do, and have been for years and years. We humans are just not smart enough to understand our own brains.

So I say turn him into a lab rat. >>


But now they would have many "volunteers" they could experiment on, and thus many different brains to compare.

But yes, such individuals could also function as "volunteers" in other types of experiments. Non-lethal of course, since no one wants to repeat the same practices as Nazi physicists used during WW2 on prisoners. Or do we?

 

[glenn1]

<< Now, we've got this individual removed from society, now what? The only logical choice would be to do some research on why exactly this individual 'malfunctioned', by studying his brain-chemistry, firing patterns, his upbringing and environment and many, many more variables.

If we would do this with many more individuals who also 'malfunction', we would gain a gigantic amount of information. Other areas of science, like neuroscience would benefit as well.

Using this information we can start looking for a cure or treatment. If we find one, and once it has proven to be effective, the individual can take his or her place again in society. >>



To quote your own words back to you, "Either you're extremely dense, or you're talking to the wrong person." I do not care what the reason for him "malfunctioning" is/was. I don't care whether he has a brain chemistry imbalance, a bad upbringing or environment, or the many more variables you discuss.

I part ways with you sharply as soon as we get to the "doing some research" on him. You want the research done so you understand why he's "broken" so you can "fix" him. I only need it to know if he meets the legal definition of insanity:

DEFENSE, INSANITY - A criminal defense asserting that at the time of the commission of the acts constituting the offense, the defendant, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, was unable to appreciate the nature and quality or the wrongfulness of his acts. Mental disease or defect does not otherwise constitute a defense. U.S.C. 18

In essence, the kid can be cuckoo like cocoa puffs, but if he was aware that what he was doing was "wrong" or he could be punished for doing it if he were caught, he has no defense. One way of determining that, would be if say the person being examined committed the act directly in front of an authority figure such as a policeman, because he was unaware what he was doing was wrong, or if he even would expect praise for doing so ("God spoke to me, and told me to kill a man i would pass in the hallway at 3pm who was wearing a blue tie").

If the kid fits this legal definition of insanity, then he should be locked up in a mental institution, and the key thrown away. If he does not, he should face a jury and whatever sentence they may mete out if he is found guilty, including the death penalty.

Where you go astray, is in your implicit assumption that there is no such thing as truly evil people, or that someone who commits acts like this must be "malfunctioning." When you start with this assumption, when someone commits acts such as this, you need to validate your worldview by saying the person must be "broken" and need "fixing" to commit such an act, as if depraved acts such as murder and rape were caused simply by a part going bad, like a motherboard with a leaky capacitor. We'll just RMA the boy, put him on the workbench for a bit, and he'll be as good and stable as new, and then we'll know how to "fix" the next kid who goes bad also. It's noble to believe that every man is basically "good" rather than evil, but also naive.

 

[schdaddy]

unless my math is bad this kid was 10 when he did this:Q

WTF is up with the people anymore?

whats worse is that they know something is goin' to happen again

<< He is likely to assault basically anybody he comes in contact with, whenever >>

 

[bjc112]

all i know if a 13 year old attack me in anyway sexually i would beat his a$$ :|


and no not that way!

 

[yerkel]

This is exactly why I don't let my kids hang out with white people.

 

[jbod]

Very good points glenn1.