Law Enforcement: Lean Trump
Police: Likely Trump
White Male Cops: Safe Trump
White Female Cops: Likely Trump
Latino Male Cops: Lean Trump
Latina Female Cops: Tossup
Black Male Cops: Lean Trump
Black Female Cops: Safe Harris
Doctors: Lean Trump
Lawyers: Safe Harris
Firefighters: Lean Trump
Military: Tossup
Teachers/Professors: Lean Harris
Entertainment: Tossup
Just my guess.
"Just [your] guess." I'm not angry at you, nor do I feel a need to argue.
But I need to point out that there is nothing factual in your listed assertions. It's all speculation. And if that is all that it is, you're wasting our time.
I just posted a new thread about a rumored SURVEY of Trump voters since 2017, but the news I've found is only a factual ANECDOTAL story quoting a Trump supporter who "didn't think he was hurting" people enough.
I want the survey results. One anecdotal fact does not a sound conclusion make.
When are they going to teach basic business statistics in high-school? No judgment here about the OP, but the Trumpers are clueless and deranged in their beliefs about factual reality --- as much as to say they ignore factual reality.
They think significant partisan-motivated voter-fraud can occur when there are 161,000 precincts, more than 500 congressional districts, 3,143 counties with Registrars of Voters, 50 US states and a few territories. With so many jurisdictions managing elections and no voter fraud reported except insignificant and prosecuted instances of it, they wasted millions of dollars in Arizona "looking for bamboo in ballot paper" over maybe six months, when a statistical sample of an appropriate size (perhaps 10,000 randomly sampled ballots) would have turned up any fraud in Arizona counties or the state, and such a sampling process might have taken at most a month.
Do I believe the recent polls of the dead heat between Harris and Trump? I'm skeptical, but they cause me concern. Yet, these polls cannot include the mountain of new registrations the country has experienced in recent months, because they wouldn't be among "likely voters" -- even newly registered -- because they didn't vote yet. To be a "likely voter", you would have had to vote previously -- indicated in the County Registrar's database.
The only way to conduct a civil political discourse would make "scientific method" the only acceptable approach. Collect as many verifiable facts as possible about issues and problems, and then use rigorous logical inference to prove your points. This was probably more evident at the time of the Lincoln Douglas debate, whereas now -- political "debating" has sunk to the level of the WWW TV Smackdown -- calling names, making up stories that aren't true, and so forth.
So where is the survey of various occupations showing preferences for either candidate?