• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

How about police coming inside, once a year, to have a look around?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Too expensive, the drones will do that job just fine. Don't forget to RFID tag your guns & ammo. 🙂
 
DaveSimmons said:
I'll give them the benefit of the doubt, and guess that the state senators were too lazy to bother to read the bill that their staff wrote for them.

I can understand that somewhat for a 1,024 page bill that was the result of months of work by a team of staffers. But this bill was only eight pages long.

Not making the effort to read a short bill on a divisive subject like gun control is just not doing your job.
Click to expand...
With incumbents being very likely to win reelection, due to a variety of factors (voter laziness, the redistricting BS they pull, single-issue voters, you name it), it seems they don't have much reason to even try to work.



And I could swear that there was something in the Bill of Rights about the government searching your home...:hmm:
 
Last edited:
Heh the idiot who sponsered the bill now condems it. These liberals just cant help themselves in exploiting a tragedy for a power grab.
 
Its crap like this that makes any attempt to make any change more difficult. And libs wonder why gun owners are so opposed to anything. Give them inch and they will take a yard.
 
The problem with a bill like this isn't even the bill itself. This thing really had no chance of passing with a stupid and unconstitutional provision like that. And even if it had passed it would easily have been struck down upon challenge. The problem with a bill like this is that it fuels the Republican paranoia that was already at a dangerously high level.
 
thraashman said:
The problem with a bill like this isn't even the bill itself. This thing really had no chance of passing with a stupid and unconstitutional provision like that. And even if it had passed it would easily have been struck down upon challenge. The problem with a bill like this is that it fuels the Republican paranoia that was already at a dangerously high level.
Click to expand...

Actually it confirms their paranoia ideas of what liberals want to do. Like I said, liberals just cant help themselves.
 
thraashman said:
The problem with a bill like this is that it fuels the Republican paranoia that was already at a dangerously high level.
Click to expand...

and can you blame them!? lol this is exactly what many pro-gun people are claiming will happen. then they try it..
 
ch33zw1z said:
What's the problem, if you've got nothing to hide right... 🙄
Click to expand...


What law would I have broken to justify this action? No one comes into my home uninvited if I have not broken a law of the land. If politicians are so worried about the safety of the general public then I recommend that the police do searches for drugs and alcohol in every residence where an individual owns automobiles. Remember more people are killed where automobiles are involved than with guns or rifles in the USA.
 
CPA said:
Here's my issue and why I can't five them the benefit of a doubt: regardless if the main sponsor read the whole thing, he had to have advised and directed the main points of the bill to his staffers (who obviously would write the language). I can't fathom that a staffer would risk their career by putting in their own thoughts into a bill. Maybe I'm naive, but I find it hard to believe that was a mistake.
Click to expand...

Especially something as drastic and specific as yearly inspections of your home.
 
ch33zw1z said:
What's the problem, if you've got nothing to hide right... 🙄
Click to expand...


Damn right! I welcome the search ... I feel anyone wanting to own a assault weapon is half way to being mentally challenged anyway. They should be investigated.

But you fools need to realize this shit will never happen. They would have to hire out twice maybe three times more cops ... There aren't enough cops to babysit all the freaks out there. Might as well say free health care to all the people that are mentally ill. There is ZERO money for all these new dreamed up laws these people want passed. So don't worry ... Nothing will change.

Altho, once we get rid of the "WAR" on drugs, maybe we'll sick the DEA into the new war on weapons? Hmmmm :whiste:

Waste of time tho, since look how well the war on drugs has worked? :hmm:
 
This was an article by democrats about democrats that realized they introduced a piece of legislation they thought would not pass and therefore put an unconstitutional idea in it to show the intention, that assault rifles that were legal in the bill should be stored safely. The democrats realized themselves this would be illegal, that it was a bad idea and that it would harm their intention to pass meaningful gun legislation. In short, democrats figured out they did something stupid and regret it because violating the constitution was not the intention. This tells us that democrats in the Seattle area want to pass gun laws that reasonable people support and will pass. The actual facts of the case, however, will matter little to the paranoid delusional gun psychopaths for whom guns are a religion. They will have their usual psychotic reactions and make thinking impartial people hysterical with laughter.
 
Moonbeam said:
This was an article by democrats about democrats that realized they introduced a piece of legislation they thought would not pass and therefore put an unconstitutional idea in it to show the intention, that assault rifles that were legal in the bill should be stored safely. The democrats realized themselves this would be illegal, that it was a bad idea and that it would harm their intention to pass meaningful gun legislation. In short, democrats figured out they did something stupid and regret it because violating the constitution was not the intention. This tells us that democrats in the Seattle area want to pass gun laws that reasonable people support and will pass. The actual facts of the case, however, will matter little to the paranoid delusional gun psychopaths for whom guns are a religion. They will have their usual psychotic reactions and make thinking impartial people hysterical with laughter.
Click to expand...


If they are so smart,

Why was it written in the first place?

hmmm? hmmm?
 
michal1980 said:
If they are so smart,

Why was it written in the first place?

hmmm? hmmm?
Click to expand...

It has nothing to do with smart. It has to do with the fact that democrats are open to self correcting. Read, open to it, not perfect or perfectly self correcting. And it says why right in the article and in my post. Learn to read what is written not see the same shit written as is in your head. You are a brainwashed goon and all you can see is the shit brainwashed into you. You are a robot and a puppet. Start to examine yourself so you can think for yourself instead of vomit what you were force fed at your favorite partisan tit. You are too old to be nursing.
 
waggy said:
and can you blame them!? lol this is exactly what many pro-gun people are claiming will happen. then they try it..
Click to expand...

No it's when children are killed by some insane nut, and the NRA spokesperson comes up with dumb tone deaf talking points (blaming video games and advocating armed guards when the armed guard didn't stop columbine) that raises the ire of people who usually don't give a crap about gun control. Then those people start asking questions...

Then we get "Oh it must've been an inside job to give the president enough support to finally grab the guns" from the truly idiotic tinfoil hatters.
 
blankslate said:
No it's when children are killed by some insane nut, and the NRA spokesperson comes up with dumb tone deaf talking points (blaming video games and advocating armed guards when the armed guard didn't stop columbine) that raises the ire of people who usually don't give a crap about gun control. Then those people start asking questions...

Then we get "Oh it must've been an inside job to give the president enough support to finally grab the guns" from the truly idiotic tinfoil hatters.
Click to expand...

An assault weapons ban and 10 round mags didn't stop Columbine either but plenty of democrats have came out with those talking points including the president.
 
Puddle Jumper said:
An assault weapons ban and 10 round mags didn't stop Columbine either but plenty of democrats have came out with those talking points including the president.
Click to expand...

Wayne Lapierre didn't help anything with his dumbass speech after the Newtown shooting.
And you don't know that there wouldn't have been even more casualties if the columbine shooters had access to 15 or 20 round magazines for their weapons.
 
Moonbeam said:
It has nothing to do with smart. It has to do with the fact that democrats are open to self correcting. Read, open to it, not perfect or perfectly self correcting. And it says why right in the article and in my post. Learn to read what is written not see the same shit written as is in your head. You are a brainwashed goon and all you can see is the shit brainwashed into you. You are a robot and a puppet. Start to examine yourself so you can think for yourself instead of vomit what you were force fed at your favorite partisan tit. You are too old to be nursing.
Click to expand...

I'm the partisan? LOL look at your post.

Again, if the dems are soo perfect as you claim they are, then why did they put this in the first place?


The only reason they are taking it out, is they got caught. Anyone with a brain knows they'd ban guns outright if they could.
 
Moonbeam said:
This was an article by democrats about democrats that realized they introduced a piece of legislation they thought would not pass and therefore put an unconstitutional idea in it to show the intention, that assault rifles that were legal in the bill should be stored safely. The democrats realized themselves this would be illegal, that it was a bad idea and that it would harm their intention to pass meaningful gun legislation. In short, democrats figured out they did something stupid and regret it because violating the constitution was not the intention. This tells us that democrats in the Seattle area want to pass gun laws that reasonable people support and will pass. The actual facts of the case, however, will matter little to the paranoid delusional gun psychopaths for whom guns are a religion. They will have their usual psychotic reactions and make thinking impartial people hysterical with laughter.
Click to expand...
You must rule at Twister, dude.

I mean, as long as they don't do anything extremist like spin "Right arm" or "Right leg". But only paranoid delusional game psychopaths would do that, right? Um, I mean other left?
 
thraashman said:
The problem with a bill like this isn't even the bill itself. This thing really had no chance of passing with a stupid and unconstitutional provision like that. And even if it had passed it would easily have been struck down upon challenge. The problem with a bill like this is that it fuels the Republican paranoia that was already at a dangerously high level.
Click to expand...

Its not paranoia if people really do want to come into your house and rummage around.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top