Originally posted by: bamacre
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: Deleted member 4644
Originally posted by: Fern
-snip-
I'm glad you can dismiss this as "mostly a convenience thing."
There are a LOT of things that would be "convenient" for the government, but we don't allow it because it would totally destroy the nature of our republic.
It doesn't change what the government (IRS) can get, as you seem to think. It changes how they get it.
Fern
And you don't see the problem with that?
It's like creating a law that says the government can search your home. Your defense would be that they could do it before with a warranty anyway, so what's the difference?
Bad anology IMO.
The IRS doesn't need a warrent to audit you or get your info for taxes, unlike searching your home.
So, unlike in your example, I don't see how the 4th Amendment is being circumvented.
If it were a 4th Amendment issue, Congress can NOT circumvent it. That would require another Constitutional Amendment and all that it entails. I.e., Congress cannot pass a law overriding any part of the Constitution.
Although the only 4th type concerns I see mentioned are in here, if some one else decides they can always challenge it in court. But I haven't been able to find anybody else who has the concerns that some here do. Might that be indicative of something? (it ain't a valid complaint or I suck at teh search)
Fern