House Speaker election/circus/all ages carnival - ongoing coverage

Page 10 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,647
5,220
136
I'm still wondering if it'd be a good thing or a bad thing for the Democrats and the nation as a whole if the loonie Freedom Caucus gets ahold of the House leadership either through emasculating McCarthy or having one of their own seize the position.

Probably won't happen although with the GOP in such disarray......

Listening to their demands, I don't think much would change in actual practice. They want a few symbolic votes on legislation that will go nowhere, demands for certain chairmanships and changing faces, other than that....

Maybe the demand to more easily add amendments that cut budgets, but again, will mostly result in more poison pills and deadlock imo.

Overall, just seems like a recipe for greater dysfunction, but gop had already been nearly maximally dysfunctional and unable to pass meaningful legislation, so what would be different?

I guess more drama, maybe even default on debt ceiling?

All of which I would say are good for Dems in 2024, bad for country in near term, but better off in longer term if the terrorists never get true power
 

SMOGZINN

Lifer
Jun 17, 2005
14,202
4,401
136
The non-partisan House clerk holds the gavel for the moment I believe.
It is the Clerk of the House, but The Clerk is not really non-partisan. That position, along with a few others, are voted in by the majority party. The current Clerk of the House is The Honorable Cheryl L. Johnson who is a Democrat and was voted in in 2019 by the Democrats.
The next order of business of the House after they elect a Speaker would be to elect a new Clerk.
 

Indus

Diamond Member
May 11, 2002
9,751
6,367
136
Wow, he agreed to drop the vote requirement. Yeah he's a goner.

Rapey McForehead bringing up Benghazi during his rant was pretty funny though, a rare glimpse of honesty from that Putin loving douchebag pederast.

People usually build a foundation to build a house upon.

McCarthy may be the first to rip apart the foundation to try
Boebert is on live with Stephanie Ruhle on MSNBC right now. This isn't a fair fight.

here

 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
26,968
35,583
136
People usually build a foundation to build a house upon.

McCarthy may be the first to rip apart the foundation to try


here



More of an outhouse really... What a shitshow. But hey, the longer this goes on the more it makes the Dems look like the adults in the room, just watching and laughing frequently. The GQP is off in a corner, screaming at eachother, flipping tables and throwing shit haha.

If it cuts into Hunter Biden's Laptop/dick hearings or the impeachment priorities of traitors, I'm all for it I guess. More juicy meat for 2024.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
26,968
35,583
136
How is the Turtle, "Moscow Mitch", when he is bending over backwards to give billions with no oversight to Ukraine?


Like you give a shit, unoriginal troll. From your join date to the pull out of Afghanistan, not one single damn post of yours about the 2.3 trillion spent there - 300million a day, for two decades.

Yes, clearly you are concerned about tax payer money.

Maybe you should elaborate on the evil military industrial complex while you're at it.
 

Lanyap

Elite Member
Dec 23, 2000
8,100
2,154
136
McCarthy doesn’t have the votes.
Scalise doesn’t have the votes.
Biggs doesn’t have the votes.
There’s only one man who can truly unite the Republican Party… Neurosurgeon, Nobel Prize winner, and WWII hero

GEORGE SANTOS.



I’m sure some repubs would vote for him.
 

CHADBOGA

Platinum Member
Mar 31, 2009
2,135
832
136
Like you give a shit, unoriginal troll. From your join date to the pull out of Afghanistan, not one single damn post of yours about the 2.3 trillion spent there - 300million a day, for two decades.

Yes, clearly you are concerned about tax payer money.

Maybe you should elaborate on the evil military industrial complex while you're at it.

If you could stop looking and acting like a less masculine version of Louie Gohmert, that would be good.
 

VRAMdemon

Diamond Member
Aug 16, 2012
6,447
7,616
136
So apparently McCarthy’s giving away (what’s left of) the store to wrangle the hold outs – lowering the threshold for introducing a motion to vacate to one member, (WTF!) appointing additional Freedom Caucus members to the powerful Rules Committee, promising votes on their priorities. Reportedly GOP “moderates” are “irate” at the concessions, many of them having pledged never to support a rules package that would allow one member to motion to vacate. Which means, most likely, that they will huff and puff anonymously in the press then dutifully vote for McCarthy.

Plus ... These “moderate” House Republicans who are willing to make Jeffries Speaker are an illusion. They’ll swallow their anger and go along with whatever McCarthy promises the Freedom Caucus to get elected, then hope it works out for the best.

This shitshow shows the Republicans are incapable/unable to lead and govern.

If they lower the threshold for introducing a motion to vacate to one member, the next two years are going to be even more insane than expected. Look at how much damage the Howler Monkey Caucus is doing when it takes several of them working together to muck things up. Give them the power to muck things up all by themselves? We’ll see votes to vacate every time the House does anything at all.

There’s 20 (or more) of these people, who are only too happy to let things burn down. One per week, and we can kiss goodbye almost half the year even if they only do this once each. Add in weeks when the House isn’t in session, and most of the year is wasted before they’ve even begun. The only way Congress is going to function over the next 2 years is for the Freedom Caucus Monkeys be neutered somehow. The House has that power. It’s just that none of the Republicans (at this point) are willing to take that step and piss off the nutballs in their own constituency. Buckle up, It’s going to be a bumpy ride.
 

manly

Lifer
Jan 25, 2000
10,907
2,058
126
I'm still wondering if it'd be a good thing or a bad thing for the Democrats and the nation as a whole if the loonie Freedom Caucus gets ahold of the House leadership either through emasculating McCarthy or having one of their own seize the position.

Probably won't happen although with the GOP in such disarray......
Doesn't the Speaker largely control the business of the House of Reps? If the Freedumb Caucus has direct or indirect control of the House, it would be an epic shit show. And not the kind like now where we can sit back, relax, and chuckle at the gridlock. IIRC the holdouts have already told McCarthy one of their conditions is impeachment of numerous Biden administration figures.

There's a large difference between gridlock where a few must-pass bills (budget and debt ceiling) squeeze through, vs. chaos because one party has long since forgotten how to govern its own members, much less a large country.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
83,717
47,400
136
So apparently McCarthy’s giving away (what’s left of) the store to wrangle the hold outs – lowering the threshold for introducing a motion to vacate to one member, (WTF!) appointing additional Freedom Caucus members to the powerful Rules Committee, promising votes on their priorities. Reportedly GOP “moderates” are “irate” at the concessions, many of them having pledged never to support a rules package that would allow one member to motion to vacate. Which means, most likely, that they will huff and puff anonymously in the press then dutifully vote for McCarthy.

Plus ... These “moderate” House Republicans who are willing to make Jeffries Speaker are an illusion. They’ll swallow their anger and go along with whatever McCarthy promises the Freedom Caucus to get elected, then hope it works out for the best.

This shitshow shows the Republicans are incapable/unable to lead and govern.

If they lower the threshold for introducing a motion to vacate to one member, the next two years are going to be even more insane than expected. Look at how much damage the Howler Monkey Caucus is doing when it takes several of them working together to muck things up. Give them the power to muck things up all by themselves? We’ll see votes to vacate every time the House does anything at all.

There’s 20 (or more) of these people, who are only too happy to let things burn down. One per week, and we can kiss goodbye almost half the year even if they only do this once each. Add in weeks when the House isn’t in session, and most of the year is wasted before they’ve even begun. The only way Congress is going to function over the next 2 years is for the Freedom Caucus Monkeys be neutered somehow. The House has that power. It’s just that none of the Republicans (at this point) are willing to take that step and piss off the nutballs in their own constituency. Buckle up, It’s going to be a bumpy ride.
Amusingly enough a lot of the rules changes the ultra right wants would make it much easier for Democrats to introduce amendments and make deals with moderate Republicans. I think the issue here is that people like Boebert are just not very intelligent and don't understand the consequences of their actions.
 

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
8,936
4,261
136
Stupid site so slow. But hehe Gaetz voted for the orange monkey
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,651
2,390
126
So apparently McCarthy’s giving away (what’s left of) the store to wrangle the hold outs – lowering the threshold for introducing a motion to vacate to one member, (WTF!) appointing additional Freedom Caucus members to the powerful Rules Committee, promising votes on their priorities. Reportedly GOP “moderates” are “irate” at the concessions, many of them having pledged never to support a rules package that would allow one member to motion to vacate. Which means, most likely, that they will huff and puff anonymously in the press then dutifully vote for McCarthy.

Plus ... These “moderate” House Republicans who are willing to make Jeffries Speaker are an illusion. They’ll swallow their anger and go along with whatever McCarthy promises the Freedom Caucus to get elected, then hope it works out for the best.

This shitshow shows the Republicans are incapable/unable to lead and govern.

If they lower the threshold for introducing a motion to vacate to one member, the next two years are going to be even more insane than expected. Look at how much damage the Howler Monkey Caucus is doing when it takes several of them working together to muck things up. Give them the power to muck things up all by themselves? We’ll see votes to vacate every time the House does anything at all.

There’s 20 (or more) of these people, who are only too happy to let things burn down. One per week, and we can kiss goodbye almost half the year even if they only do this once each. Add in weeks when the House isn’t in session, and most of the year is wasted before they’ve even begun. The only way Congress is going to function over the next 2 years is for the Freedom Caucus Monkeys be neutered somehow. The House has that power. It’s just that none of the Republicans (at this point) are willing to take that step and piss off the nutballs in their own constituency. Buckle up, It’s going to be a bumpy ride.

IMO it's not a matter of them being incompetent but rather the MAGAs adroitly maneuvering to institutionalize their corruption. Definitely not a good result for America.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: CHADBOGA

Pohemi

Diamond Member
Oct 2, 2004
8,609
10,837
146
Amusingly enough a lot of the rules changes the ultra right wants would make it much easier for Democrats to introduce amendments and make deals with moderate Republicans. I think the issue here is that people like Boebert are just not very intelligent and don't understand the consequences of their actions.
Right....the policy of the new blood in the GOP is break it and blame Democrats later. Actions and bluster purely out of feels and spite, instead of thoughtful consideration and governance for the general populace.

It's all about who can be the biggest, most abrasive asshole in the spotlight.
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
31,493
9,819
136
Amusingly enough a lot of the rules changes the ultra right wants would make it much easier for Democrats to introduce amendments and make deals with moderate Republicans. I think the issue here is that people like Boebert are just not very intelligent and don't understand the consequences of their actions.
i mean, republicans tend to prove that true over and over again..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Meghan54 and Pohemi

woolfe9998

Lifer
Apr 8, 2013
16,188
14,090
136
Wait. WTF? Very little reporting on this but...



House Republicans are expected to curtail the power of an independent congressional ethics body just as it was weighing whether to open investigations into GOP lawmakers who defied January 6 select committee subpoenas and a new Republican who fabricated his past during his election campaign.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news...recount-attorney-general-election-human-error
The new House rules package that governs the Office of Congressional Ethics – which was drafted by the incoming Republican majority leadership and will almost certainly be adopted – makes two major changes to the body that would significantly undercut its ability to function.

Though seemingly innocuous, the changes appear to have been drafted to strike at the principal vulnerabilities of OCE and defang its investigative powers for at least the next two years, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

I don't think this is related to the Speakership issue. McCarthy is backing this.

This is the party of "draining the swamp" eh?
 

eelw

Diamond Member
Dec 4, 1999
8,936
4,261
136
Airplane on the treadmill. Talks yesterday made absolutely no difference in vote 7
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
83,717
47,400
136
Wait. WTF? Very little reporting on this but...





I don't think this is related to the Speakership issue. McCarthy is backing this.

This is the party of "draining the swamp" eh?
You may be shocked to learn their claims to oppose corruption were not genuine!