• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

House Passes 1/6 Commission

Page 99 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I think Meadows might be up a and without a paddle. This is fucking insane
www.cnn.com

Meadows texts reveal direct White House communications with pro-Trump operative behind plans to seize voting machines

As allies of then-President Donald Trump made a final push to overturn the election in late-December 2020, one of the key operatives behind the effort briefed then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows about his attempts to gain access to voting systems in key battleground states, starting...
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
 
Fenixgoon said:
I think Meadows might be up a and without a paddle. This is fucking insane
www.cnn.com

Meadows texts reveal direct White House communications with pro-Trump operative behind plans to seize voting machines

As allies of then-President Donald Trump made a final push to overturn the election in late-December 2020, one of the key operatives behind the effort briefed then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows about his attempts to gain access to voting systems in key battleground states, starting...
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com
Click to expand...
A creek.
 
But it’s a possibility he’s one of the snitches for the search warrant. Also he could have arranged a deal with DOJ to avoid the contempt charge from congress.
 
Roger Wilco said:
uh

https://twitter.com/x/status/1573442914281312273
Click to expand...
full 60 minutes video of his interview. they have a full connection map of communications between individuals of interest. sounds like he needed way more funding to get the serious dirt. military intelligence specialist, later ran and won a congress seat as a R. recommended to committee by Liz Cheney. quit R party after jan6.
if by some miracle the dems hold the house, the jan6 committee could really dig into this one and have some serious, consequential evidence.
 
gorobei said:
full 60 minutes video of his interview. they have a full connection map of communications between individuals of interest. sounds like he needed way more funding to get the serious dirt. military intelligence specialist, later ran and won a congress seat as a R. recommended to committee by Liz Cheney. quit R party after jan6.
if by some miracle the dems hold the house, the jan6 committee could really dig into this one and have some serious, consequential evidence.
Click to expand...
As soon as the house flips after the midterms, Jan 6 committee is dissolved and first of many Biden impeachment proceedings begins.
 
Fenixgoon said:
it's not like he'd be convicted in the senate. the only reason to do it would be to be petty. of course, that's a pretty low bar to clear for repubs
Click to expand...
Certainly won't be convicted, but it'll be red meat for the base and a great source of liberal tears, which means it's basically 100% happening. The far right idiot brigade is already introducing articles of impeachment. Unfortunately, the pressure is great even on the "mainstream" Republicans.
 
TheVrolok said:
As soon as the house flips after the midterms, Jan 6 committee is dissolved and first of many Biden impeachment proceedings begins.
Click to expand...
exactly what are they going to impeach him on that has any legitimacy, be specific? Besides, I think you are going to be sadly disappointed with the midterm election results.
 
NWRMidnight said:
exactly what are they going to impeach him on that has any legitimacy, be specific? Besides, I think you are going to be sadly disappointed with the midterm election results.
Click to expand...
Letting Obama wear a tan suit, Benghazi, and a pizza parlor?

Republi-Q's don't need no stinking legitimacy, reality, or sanity. Just need their marching orders from Putin.
 
Agreed, most Republicans don't think either of Trump's impeachments were legitimate. They will not hesitate to impeach Biden for anything and everything they can think of without regard to "legitimacy."
 
fskimospy said:
Oh if they get the house republicans will impeach Biden, probably multiple times. This will backfire on them.
Click to expand...

Remember who they are, these republicans now running for house and senate seats. They aren't just republicans, they are election deniers republicans and Trump blessed republicans who are running for the house and senate seats. People comparable to Marjorie Taylor Greene and Jim Jordan. They were born to impeach Joe Biden, and they indeed will try if for no other reason than because Joe Biden is an illegitimate president in their eyes.

You gotta remember, if republicans do take back the house and or senate it will be with extremist Trumpie republicans. Wackos. Lunatics. Crazy people AND.... most if not all of them hard core Q's.
So if republicans do take the house and or senate, expect not only an attempt to impeach Joe Biden, but then impeach of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton and most certainly Bill Clinton, AGAIN.

Besides, they MUST impeach Joe Biden because then they can give Donald Trump back his four years of the presidency which they will claim Joe Biden illegally stole from Trump. Do the math.... Donald Trump elected to a second term plus four more years that democrats stole from Trump to equal a Trump second term of eight years. (4+4=8)

So, expect all of THAT should republicans regain control.
 
NWRMidnight said:
exactly what are they going to impeach him on that has any legitimacy, be specific? Besides, I think you are going to be sadly disappointed with the midterm election results.
Click to expand...

Drinking the blood of trafficked children. Half of their base believes he's ALREADY been tried/executed for it.

P.S.
They don't need any reality based reason.
 
TheVrolok said:
Looks like it's already been covered, but just to respond myself, who said anything about legitimacy? Entirely unnecessary for impeachment.
Click to expand...
I didn't ask what has been covered by others, the media, or what conservatives have claimed. I asked YOU specifically what they are going to impeach him on that has any legitimacy. Translation: I wanted you to list what YOU believed to be legitimate reason to impeach Biden on.

Bold Type: I did, legitimate reasons is exactly what I am/was asking for, as all that is out there are made up illegitimate reasons (aka bullshit). But you answered it, indirectly, there are no legitimate reasons. I am also very aware that impeachment doesn't require legitimacy, which is why I never asked if, or implied that it did.

Your response indicates you agree, that there is no legitimate reason to impeach Biden. It highlights the difference between Trump being impeached twice, and the revenge impeachment(s) of Biden that may happen if the republican's regain the house. All Biden impeachments will do is further prove that the republican party is the party of clowns.
 
I know we had this hurricane down in Florida, but delaying the latest hearing did not set well. It just adds to the committees lack of credibility. It makes the hearings appear less important, and more as political revenge. At this point few really care, and still we have the two sides. The pro-Trump, and the anti-Trump.
No, that will not change regardless of this or any committee.
The anti-Trump will reset their DVR, and the pro-Trump will simply ignore it all.
But really, any delay with the hearing looks bad.
 
NWRMidnight said:
I didn't ask what has been covered by others, the media, or what conservatives have claimed. I asked YOU specifically what they are going to impeach him on that has any legitimacy. Translation: I wanted you to list what YOU believed to be legitimate reason to impeach Biden on.

Bold Type: I did, legitimate reasons is exactly what I am/was asking for, as all that is out there are made up illegitimate reasons (aka bullshit). But you answered it, indirectly, there are no legitimate reasons. I am also very aware that impeachment doesn't require legitimacy, which is why I never asked if, or implied that it did.

Your response indicates you agree, that there is no legitimate reason to impeach Biden. It highlights the difference between Trump being impeached twice, and the revenge impeachment(s) of Biden that may happen if the republican's regain the house. All Biden impeachments will do is further prove that the republican party is the party of clowns.
Click to expand...
Highlights to who? People who already know all this.
 
dank69 said:
Highlights to who? People who already know all this.
Click to expand...
Why would people who already know this need it to have it highlighted? Please, drink your coffee before you post so you can use some basic logic. There will always be people who need to be reminded of reality and basic facts.
 
NWRMidnight said:
Why would people who already know this need it to have it highlighted? Please, drink your coffee before you post so you can use some basic logic. There will always be people who need to be reminded of reality and basic facts.
Click to expand...
Yeah but they aren't coming here for that. Also, coffee is garbage.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top