Originally posted by: HokieESM
Originally posted by: BigSmooth
I just thought that it was odd that in the actual TSX section of the 10Best article, C&D specifically mentions the IS300 and 325 as competitors but that they prefer the TSX, whereas in the TL review they say they would be "hard-pressed" to recommend it over the G35 or 330 due to the TL's lack of RWD.
Granted, the TSX is not as powerful as the TL so torque steer is likely less of an issue, but why weren't they "hard-pressed" to recommend the TSX over the RWD IS300? Just seems like there is some hypocrisy there.
oh, i'm not saying i "agree" with C&D--there's a reason I let my suscripton lapse.
🙂 C&D seems to have a lot of opinion difference on their staff--so you have to pay CLOSE attention to who writes an article. Brock Yates' opinion is going to be a LOT different than Barry Winfield (who's British) or John Phillips.
My whole point is that the $5K or $6K difference in a loaded IS300 and the stock-loaded TSX might make a big difference in the choice. Size/layout wise, they're competitors.... but they're fundamentally different (the IS300//325 are actually significantly smaller--try to get in the backseat if your 6+ feet) in their intent. For a person looking at a ~$26K car (like myself), the IS300 just isn't an option--they really start at $30K or so--but the TSX definitely is (i don't need navigation... I can read a map).
And don't get me started on the BMW 325i.... I had no idea how stripped the "base" models are--and how much they gouge for options. Not to mention the dealer's attitude.... grrr.