Homosexual Propaganda

[NikPreviousAcct]

It's the same bullsh|t that's been going on with the concept of racism for decades, only now it's branching out to other retarded, knee-jerk, self-perpetuating "hate crimes."

 

[Legend]

Originally posted by: Babbles

Originally posted by: preslove

Originally posted by: Stew

I don't want people telling me what I'm allowed to find offensive or not. I can disagree with homosexuality as much as I want, and that is not homophobia.

That just makes you an idiot.

No it does not make him an idiot, and the fact that this is how you think somewhat demonstrates how dense you are.

Originally posted by: Forsythe
Lmao, some of the guys in this forum need to leave the closet.
It's a picture of two guys kissing, what's wrong with that? If you seriously object to that completely innocent thing you are a homophobe.

Needlessly promoting sexuality of any flavor is not, or should not, be the job of a school. It would be inappropriate to have a poster of a guy and girl kissing, and likewise it is inappropriate to have a poster of two guys kissing. I'm sure most, if not all schools, probably have rules against guys and girls making out in the hallways. As such why would it be acceptable to condone two guys making out in the hallways? it's like some sort of twisted reverse double standard. It's not a "homophobia" thing, it is a "not appropriate for a learning environment" thing.

Originally posted by: MercenaryForHire
Shocking? FOR THE HOMOPHOBES!

- M4H

:beer:

Promoting homosexuality:

1. As in try make kids gay? If you pop a boner over that, then you already are gay. It would only be a choice if you were bi. You can't become gay, unless they mess with prenatal hormones during pregnancy. Scientists have done this with rats and have successfully made rats gay.

2. Bring acceptance against the highschool "omg, that's gay" mentality? That's a bad thing?



That said, I am opposed to this being posted. Why? Because I HATE posters and ads. On my university campus, there's people handing out ads and sh1t all over the place. I can't stand it. Then again, posters aren't really intrusive.

 

[raildogg]

Originally posted by: Nik
It's the same bullsh|t that's been going on with the concept of racism for decades, only now it's branching out to other retarded, knee-jerk, self-perpetuating "hate crimes."

Explain. You know, that there might actually be racism and homophobida? :shocked:

 

[Forsythe]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Forsythe

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Forsythe

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: Forsythe
Lmao, some of the guys in this forum need to leave the closet.
It's a picture of two guys kissing, what's wrong with that? If you seriously object to that completely innocent thing you are a homophobe.

And back to the other side... sigh. If we don't all believe and accept the ways we're told to believe and accept, then we're guilty of thoughtcrime, and our rights to free expression are null and void. Homosexuality or being a "homophobe" have nothing to with that.

You're just as idiotically brainwashed as the fundie Christians here.

"A plague o' both your houses!"

I suppose you'd like to ban black people marrying aswell? If not, tell me exactly what's the difference here.

Wow... I've always known you were stupid and unable to argue without using outrageous straw men and veiled insults, but now you proven it for everyone to see.

What I said is that people have every right to their own beliefs. And that they have no right to make their beliefs into law.

As I know you are a moralist busybody from the other end of the spectrum, I've no doubt that your disconnected doublethinking brain will be completely unable to understand this. But those who actually can think will understand and will be laughing at you.

Hey, ignorance is bliss. And i'm blessed with it.

What i'm saying is that you don't like gay people, that's in the same category as not liking black people, because they're black, and if you don't like women, because well, they wine alot.

To sum up, i'm saying that you are a bigot, that will make the world better when you die. (We know the only way humans progress is by dying, as humans rarely change views during a lifetime.)

There's nothing wrong with disliking gay or black people, that just makes you an idiot.
And we all know that countering idiocy is done by posters like that informing people. Propaganda, but a mild form. This is done in schools because you can best affect children.

You don't actually READ my posts, do you?

edit: Or is it just that flinging baseless insults without a shred of truth or merit is your way of telling us that your brainwashed mind cannot understand my arguments? You, with your intolerance for the beliefs of others, is far far closer to being a bigot than I am.

I read some of your posts yeah But as a early draft of my previous post would have contained i don't really care about whether you don't like gay people at all, since i cba to read through the posts in this thread. I scanned them, and i don't remember names.

And for the hell of it you can replace the "you" in that post with someone else.
That's irrelevant.

My point is that you are a bigot if you don't like gay people (especially because men have a high chance of liking women making out ).

If you wanted to discuss it can't you just mend this misunderstanding and tell me what you think is wrong instead of insulting me.

 

[Nebor]

Oh my gosh, I just laughed myself half to death seeing that poster.

 

[Forsythe]

Originally posted by: raildogg

Originally posted by: Nik
It's the same bullsh|t that's been going on with the concept of racism for decades, only now it's branching out to other retarded, knee-jerk, self-perpetuating "hate crimes."

Explain. You know, that there might actually be racism and homophobida? :shocked:

From Nik? You've gotta be kidding me!!1!

 

[halik]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: JS80
I did. My point was "separation of church and state" is a made up liberal term.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


What part about NO LAW do you not understand?

Maybe my reading comprehension is fail but that statement to me means the government can't make a law saying X religion is the official religion and all other religions are illegal. I still don't see this separation of church thing.

"NO LAW".

That also means that laws cannot be passed based on the made-up prejudices of certain religions, which would have the effect of favoring one religion over another (or the lack thereof).

It's not a "liberal agenda." Nor even remotely modern. The expression "separation of church and state" was coined by Thomas Jefferson. In a famous letter to Dr. Benjamin Rush discussing certain religious leaders who wanted to get their moral busybody-dom legislated, Jefferson said about them, "They fear me, and rightly so, for I have sworn upon the altar of Almighty God eternal hostility to every tyranny over the minds of men."
James Madison, who wrote the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, said, "Strongly guarded is the separation between religion and government in the Constitution of the United States."

Your pastor lied to you, bitch.

Let me be the first one to chime:
OWNED

 

[classy]

Originally posted by: Vic

Originally posted by: classy
For you Vic-toria

Romans 1
26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature.

27 And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men, working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompense for their error which was meet.

28 And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind to do those things which are not fitting,

29 being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness, full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity. They are whisperers,

30 backbiters, haters of God, spiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,

31 without understanding, covenantbreakers, without natural affections, implacable, unmerciful.

32 And knowing the judgment of God, that those who commit such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but have pleasure in those who do them.

Ah... yet more picking and choosing in your "literal" interpretation. That is Paul describing the judgement of God upon sinners, not the judgement of classy, whom God commanded to love all men regardless of their sins. There is quite a difference there FYI.

The very beginning completely deals with homosexuality and you know it. Any idiot can clearly see he is condemning homosexuality in detail. But people like you need to pay attention to verse 32 while your out here promoting this slop. In Corinthians and hebrews we are commanded not to be joined with those who we know are perpetual sinners, ala homosexuals. You can try to distort and run out love and all that nonsense, but fact is the greatest commandment is to love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and strength. And true Love is showed by a person's actions, if he loves God he or she would not being practicing homosexality. Now whether you like it or not the bible condemns homosexuality. And while you are becoming a spoke person for it, guess what it condemns you too, or have you never read

Luke 17
2 It were better for him that a millstone were hung about his neck and he cast into the sea, than that he should cause one of these little ones to fall.


Keep on promoting homosexuality Vic, dummy.

 

[kogase]

Originally posted by: classy
The very beginning completely deals with homosexuality and you know it. Any idiot can clearly see he is condemning homosexuality in detail. But people like you need to pay attention to verse 32 while your out here promoting this slop. In Corinthians and hebrews we are commanded not to be joined with those who we know are perpetual sinners, ala homosexuals. You can try to distort and run out love and all that nonsense, but fact is the greatest commandment is to love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and strength. And true Love is showed by a person's actions, if he loves God he or she would not being practicing homosexality. Now whether you like it or not the bible condemns homosexuality. And while you are becoming a spoke person for it, guess what it condemns you too, or have you never read

Luke 17
2 It were better for him that a millstone were hung about his neck and he cast into the sea, than that he should cause one of these little ones to fall.


Keep on promoting homosexuality Vic, dummy.

Where in the Bible does God elect you as his enforcer? You have no business telling people what they can and can't do, only God does.

 

[Excelsior]

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: Legend

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: JS80

I did. My point was "separation of church and state" is a made up liberal term.

I'm a registered Republican. And even I'm turned off by the idiotic Christians. It's a shame when the party you're registered with goes down the drain so much that you have to vote for the other side in order to get someone that's qualified.

I'm a McCain republican, not a bible-thumping looney-toon "curious" george bush or pat robertson republican. They aren't republicans, they're morons.

Same here, aside from registration. I'll never register for a party. I'm voting Libertarian until these "Republicans" get out of the Republican party.

Don't come crying when you cause Hillary to be elected like voting for Perot did to Bush/Clinton. Same shvt with Iran. All the sane people boycotted the election and caused the nutjob to be elected. Don't let this happen in 08.

I don't think anyone has to worry about her being elected.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: raildogg

Originally posted by: Nik
It's the same bullsh|t that's been going on with the concept of racism for decades, only now it's branching out to other retarded, knee-jerk, self-perpetuating "hate crimes."

Explain. You know, that there might actually be racism and homophobida? :shocked:

Making posters isn't going to do anything about it. If someone's a homophobe, let them be. if someone's racist, let them be. It's their choice. Choose to be better than they are, but leave them the hell alone and move on with your life instead of making fcking retarded posters and hanging them everywhere.

 

[Excelsior]

Originally posted by: Forsythe
Lmao, some of the guys in this forum need to leave the closet.
It's a picture of two guys kissing, what's wrong with that? If you seriously object to that completely innocent thing you are a homophobe.

Nvm, you have already be told what is up.


You still don't get it though.

 

[IHateMyJob2004]

Homosexuals run half of hollywood. Might as well get used to it. My only fear is that homosexualism might become a fad. Seriosuly ... with it being forced down our childrens throats (don't think about that sentence to much) I wonder if "straight" people will end up gay.

It's already sad enough that my gaydar doesn't work anymore.

Anyways, I think I say what everyone else is thinking when I say this. I want my gays back in the closet.

 

[Legend]

Originally posted by: Excelsior

Originally posted by: JS80

Originally posted by: Legend

Originally posted by: 91TTZ

Originally posted by: JS80

I did. My point was "separation of church and state" is a made up liberal term.

I'm a registered Republican. And even I'm turned off by the idiotic Christians. It's a shame when the party you're registered with goes down the drain so much that you have to vote for the other side in order to get someone that's qualified.

I'm a McCain republican, not a bible-thumping looney-toon "curious" george bush or pat robertson republican. They aren't republicans, they're morons.

Same here, aside from registration. I'll never register for a party. I'm voting Libertarian until these "Republicans" get out of the Republican party.

Don't come crying when you cause Hillary to be elected like voting for Perot did to Bush/Clinton. Same shvt with Iran. All the sane people boycotted the election and caused the nutjob to be elected. Don't let this happen in 08.

I don't think anyone has to worry about her being elected.

The whole point is to make it so the Democrats win. It's to force the Republican to change to more traditional Libertarian viewpoints. The Republican party and the Democrats are both fiscally liberal. They just choose different places to spend.

Even though I have my disagreements with him:

Bill Clinton >> George W Bush

 

[Legend]

Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Homosexuals run half of hollywood. Might as well get used to it. My only fear is that homosexualism might become a fad. Seriosuly ... with it being forced down our childrens throats (don't think about that sentence to much) I wonder if "straight" people will end up gay.

It's already sad enough that my gaydar doesn't work anymore.

Anyways, I think I say what everyone else is thinking when I say this. I want my gays back in the closet.

So what you're saying is that the heterosexuality of many falls on a thin line of their belief of superiority to gays. Sounds like those people need to come out of the closet. No magnitude of social acceptance would make truly straight people gay.

 

[IHateMyJob2004]

Originally posted by: Legend

Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Homosexuals run half of hollywood. Might as well get used to it. My only fear is that homosexualism might become a fad. Seriosuly ... with it being forced down our childrens throats (don't think about that sentence to much) I wonder if "straight" people will end up gay.

It's already sad enough that my gaydar doesn't work anymore.

Anyways, I think I say what everyone else is thinking when I say this. I want my gays back in the closet.

So what you're saying is that the heterosexuality of many falls on a thin line of their belief of superiority to gays. Sounds like those people need to come out of the closet. No magnitude of social acceptance would make truly straight people gay.

No, I think of growing up and my 90 year old aunt (lesbian) and 50 year old aunt) who don't march down to main street. They don't make their sexual orientation known. I was over 20 when I figured them out. There was a day when this was normal and I didn't here gay people complaining.

I don't flaunt my heterosexuality .. why is it so PC these days for homos to do such things?

As for part two of your comment. It's the whole nature/nurture thing. Unless you think who you are is 100% nature ... you are dead wrong. That is my point. You are incfluenced by your surroundings at a young age. People you interact with, things you see on TV and what you see on posters. This impacts the very absorbent brain of young people in one way or another. So I disagree ...... things liek these posters do have a negative effect.

BTW: Remembe the 80s. I could watch any show on TV with my parents in the 8-10 PM time frame. It is sad that my child will probably grow up without a TV. For reasons beyond the fact that every show seems to feature a gay person these days ... but that is one of hte reasopns for this statement.

 

[Queasy]

Ignoring all the other posts in this thread and going back to what the OP showed....that is just disgraceful. I'm sorry but if that had been a man and a woman it would still be disgraceful. Its not the place of a school to be pushing sexual agendas or to allow sexual agendas to be shoved down the throats of others in such a blatantly irresponsible fashion.

It was only 13 years ago that kids in my high school were wearing pink triangles to support the two gays kids we had in the entire school. I didn't care one way or the other but at least they did it in a tasteful manner. To have a picture of somebody getting ready to shove their tongue down the throat of another goes beyond bad taste.

 

[IHateMyJob2004]

Originally posted by: Queasy
Ignoring all the other posts in this thread and going back to what the OP showed....that is just disgraceful. I'm sorry but if that had been a man and a woman it would still be disgraceful. Its not the place of a school to be pushing sexual agendas or to allow sexual agendas to be shoved down the throats of others in such a blatantly irresponsible fashion.

It was only 13 years ago that kids in my high school were wearing pink triangles to support the two gays kids we had in the entire school. I didn't care one way or the other but at least they did it in a tasteful manner. To have a picture of somebody getting ready to shove their tongue down the throat of another goes beyond bad taste.

Very god point. But in order to not get fired from our jobs ... we have to be quiet ... shhhhh

 

[Queasy]

Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004

Originally posted by: Queasy
Ignoring all the other posts in this thread and going back to what the OP showed....that is just disgraceful. I'm sorry but if that had been a man and a woman it would still be disgraceful. Its not the place of a school to be pushing sexual agendas or to allow sexual agendas to be shoved down the throats of others in such a blatantly irresponsible fashion.

It was only 13 years ago that kids in my high school were wearing pink triangles to support the two gays kids we had in the entire school. I didn't care one way or the other but at least they did it in a tasteful manner. To have a picture of somebody getting ready to shove their tongue down the throat of another goes beyond bad taste.

Very god point. But in order to not get fired from our jobs ... we have to be quiet ... shhhhh

HAH! That's another great point. If I had a picture like this up in my cube at work I'd be punished/reprimanded/had a talking to for sexual harrassment!!!!

That's what the OP needs to do!! He needs to find a sexual harrassment complaint against his school!!!

 

[IHateMyJob2004]

Originally posted by: Queasy

Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004

Originally posted by: Queasy
Ignoring all the other posts in this thread and going back to what the OP showed....that is just disgraceful. I'm sorry but if that had been a man and a woman it would still be disgraceful. Its not the place of a school to be pushing sexual agendas or to allow sexual agendas to be shoved down the throats of others in such a blatantly irresponsible fashion.

It was only 13 years ago that kids in my high school were wearing pink triangles to support the two gays kids we had in the entire school. I didn't care one way or the other but at least they did it in a tasteful manner. To have a picture of somebody getting ready to shove their tongue down the throat of another goes beyond bad taste.

Very god point. But in order to not get fired from our jobs ... we have to be quiet ... shhhhh

HAH! That's another great point. If I had a picture like this up in my cube at work I'd be punished/reprimanded/had a talking to for sexual harrassment!!!!

That's what the OP needs to do!! He needs to find a sexual harrassment complaint against his school!!!

Well, if a gay person had this up in their cube and you complaned .. you'd probably get fired for complaining. That's what bothers me. I'd be afraid to complain about it even though the poster would truely bother me.

 

[Legend]

Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004

Originally posted by: Legend

Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Homosexuals run half of hollywood. Might as well get used to it. My only fear is that homosexualism might become a fad. Seriosuly ... with it being forced down our childrens throats (don't think about that sentence to much) I wonder if "straight" people will end up gay.

It's already sad enough that my gaydar doesn't work anymore.

Anyways, I think I say what everyone else is thinking when I say this. I want my gays back in the closet.

So what you're saying is that the heterosexuality of many falls on a thin line of their belief of superiority to gays. Sounds like those people need to come out of the closet. No magnitude of social acceptance would make truly straight people gay.

No, I think of growing up and my 90 year old aunt (lesbian) and 50 year old aunt) who don't march down to main street. They don't make their sexual orientation known. I was over 20 when I figured them out. There was a day when this was normal and I didn't here gay people complaining.

I don't flaunt my heterosexuality .. why is it so PC these days for homos to do such things?

As for part two of your comment. It's the whole nature/nurture thing. Unless you think who you are is 100% nature ... you are dead wrong. That is my point. You are incfluenced by your surroundings at a young age. People you interact with, things you see on TV and what you see on posters. This impacts the very absorbent brain of young people in one way or another. So I disagree ...... things liek these posters do have a negative effect.

BTW: Remembe the 80s. I could watch any show on TV with my parents in the 8-10 PM time frame. It is sad that my child will probably grow up without a TV. For reasons beyond the fact that every show seems to feature a gay person these days ... but that is one of hte reasopns for this statement.

I seriously doubt there's any nuturing going on at the age of high school.

All scientific studies dealing with nuture deal with prenatal hormones, and that gay people's brains are structured different from straight people. The human brain at the high school level has stopped growing. You're implying that you can change someone's sexuality with a fully developed brain. Is there anything scientific to suggest this?

 

[Forsythe]

Originally posted by: Excelsior

Originally posted by: Forsythe
Lmao, some of the guys in this forum need to leave the closet.
It's a picture of two guys kissing, what's wrong with that? If you seriously object to that completely innocent thing you are a homophobe.

Nvm, you have already be told what is up.


You still don't get it though.

Then tell me what is up?

 

[LtPage1]

Whatever. You wouldn't be complaining if it were a white girl and a black guy making out, and a slogan that said "RACISM FREE ZONE," ("I have a right to think interracial relationships are disgusting!" ...yeah, right.) so just admit you're a homophobe and get over it.

 

[Forsythe]

Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004

Originally posted by: Legend

Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Homosexuals run half of hollywood. Might as well get used to it. My only fear is that homosexualism might become a fad. Seriosuly ... with it being forced down our childrens throats (don't think about that sentence to much) I wonder if "straight" people will end up gay.

It's already sad enough that my gaydar doesn't work anymore.

Anyways, I think I say what everyone else is thinking when I say this. I want my gays back in the closet.

So what you're saying is that the heterosexuality of many falls on a thin line of their belief of superiority to gays. Sounds like those people need to come out of the closet. No magnitude of social acceptance would make truly straight people gay.

No, I think of growing up and my 90 year old aunt (lesbian) and 50 year old aunt) who don't march down to main street. They don't make their sexual orientation known. I was over 20 when I figured them out. There was a day when this was normal and I didn't here gay people complaining.

I don't flaunt my heterosexuality .. why is it so PC these days for homos to do such things?

As for part two of your comment. It's the whole nature/nurture thing. Unless you think who you are is 100% nature ... you are dead wrong. That is my point. You are incfluenced by your surroundings at a young age. People you interact with, things you see on TV and what you see on posters. This impacts the very absorbent brain of young people in one way or another. So I disagree ...... things liek these posters do have a negative effect.

BTW: Remembe the 80s. I could watch any show on TV with my parents in the 8-10 PM time frame. It is sad that my child will probably grow up without a TV. For reasons beyond the fact that every show seems to feature a gay person these days ... but that is one of hte reasopns for this statement.

haha, you are a homophobe that's is hurting your child.

 

[Queasy]

Originally posted by: Legend

Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004

Originally posted by: Legend

Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Homosexuals run half of hollywood. Might as well get used to it. My only fear is that homosexualism might become a fad. Seriosuly ... with it being forced down our childrens throats (don't think about that sentence to much) I wonder if "straight" people will end up gay.

It's already sad enough that my gaydar doesn't work anymore.

Anyways, I think I say what everyone else is thinking when I say this. I want my gays back in the closet.

So what you're saying is that the heterosexuality of many falls on a thin line of their belief of superiority to gays. Sounds like those people need to come out of the closet. No magnitude of social acceptance would make truly straight people gay.

No, I think of growing up and my 90 year old aunt (lesbian) and 50 year old aunt) who don't march down to main street. They don't make their sexual orientation known. I was over 20 when I figured them out. There was a day when this was normal and I didn't here gay people complaining.

I don't flaunt my heterosexuality .. why is it so PC these days for homos to do such things?

As for part two of your comment. It's the whole nature/nurture thing. Unless you think who you are is 100% nature ... you are dead wrong. That is my point. You are incfluenced by your surroundings at a young age. People you interact with, things you see on TV and what you see on posters. This impacts the very absorbent brain of young people in one way or another. So I disagree ...... things liek these posters do have a negative effect.

BTW: Remembe the 80s. I could watch any show on TV with my parents in the 8-10 PM time frame. It is sad that my child will probably grow up without a TV. For reasons beyond the fact that every show seems to feature a gay person these days ... but that is one of hte reasopns for this statement.

I seriously doubt there's any nuturing going on at the age of high school.

All scientific studies dealing with nuture deal with prenatal hormones, and that gay people's brains are structured different from straight people. The human brain at the high school level has stopped growing. You're implying that you can change someone's sexuality with a fully developed brain. Is there anything scientific to suggest this?

Actually, there are studies that show that the brain's reasoning centers aren't fully developed yet for high school aged kids. Which is why teenagers have a propensity for doing stupid stuff that most adults wouldn't do.