"Homebrew" Psilocybin Created By Scientists Using "Widely Available" Materials

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,875
10,222
136
All that said, I'm not a fan of finding new cheap easy fast ways of getting high. We have enough right now.
"Enough right now?" What's a "cheap easy fast way of getting high" in the way that psilocybin does it? I know of none.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,396
136
Imagine being so myopic you can't see further than your country because they are meaningless to you. These conservatives can't see past the bridge of their white noses.

Except when it comes to fascist election conspiracy theories, then all of a sudden they can see them far and wide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi and Muse

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,751
20,326
146
I absolutely disagree. The addictive nature of opiates plus the euphoria they generate combined with the advertising might of Coca Cola or Philip Morris and them being totally legalised?
No way would usage stay flat.

Drug advertisement can be heavily regulated, just like tobacco. We should do the same to junk food because of it's addictive nature. One of my current beefs with Rec MJ is just that, there's advertisements all over the place. It really doesn't need to be that way.

Tobacco is a great example of limiting advertisement and public education really reducing usage.
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,373
16,647
146
Drug advertisement can be heavily regulated, just like tobacco. We should do the same to junk food because of it's addictive nature. One of my current beefs with Rec MJ is just that, there's advertisements all over the place. It really doesn't need to be that way.

Tobacco is a great example of limiting advertisement and public education really reducing usage.
Best of luck, drug advertisements are out of fucking control in America. There should be no place for patients to suggest medication to doctors. It fosters a relationship that encourages faulty self diagnosis and alternative medicine.
 
  • Love
  • Like
Reactions: hal2kilo and Muse

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,110
11,287
136
Drug advertisement can be heavily regulated, just like tobacco. We should do the same to junk food because of it's addictive nature. One of my current beefs with Rec MJ is just that, there's advertisements all over the place. It really doesn't need to be that way.

Tobacco is a great example of limiting advertisement and public education really reducing usage.
Make heroin legal. Properly legal. And you are going to end up with soft drinks with it in with massive corporations pushing it.
Monster energy drinks with smack in anyone?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pohemi

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,751
20,326
146
Best of luck, drug advertisements are out of fucking control in America. There should be no place for patients to suggest medication to doctors. It fosters a relationship that encourages faulty self diagnosis and alternative medicine.

No doubt, I agree. But those are prescriptions, which I've seen for opiates as well in the last few years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pohemi

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,751
20,326
146
Make heroin legal. Properly legal. And you are going to end up with soft drinks with it in with massive corporations pushing it.
Monster energy drinks with smack in anyone?

Alcohol, tobacco, and MJ are not like that at all in my state.
 
Jul 9, 2009
10,758
2,086
136
Well sticking to the instance at hand is how things are supposed to be discussed, unless you are a disengenuous knob.
I don't live in or visit Europe. My knowledge of European laws, prohibitions and ethics is as limited as your knowledge of the United States.
 

killster1

Banned
Mar 15, 2007
6,205
475
126
  • Haha
Reactions: KMFJD

Pohemi

Lifer
Oct 2, 2004
10,882
16,963
146
Best of luck, drug advertisements are out of fucking control in America.
Pharmaceuticals, I would completely agree.

I might be mistaken, but I thought he was referring to the changes in advertising that have happened over the past decades for alcohol and tobacco. Remember how those ads use to be, and how many more places you could find them?

Limits and more restrictive regulations (on marketing of the products) were definitely put into place over time on those goods.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,751
20,326
146
I think what's greatly overlooked is the source of the current opiate problem in the U.S., which can be tricky to lay at any one company, even pharma corps capitalizing on a ripe market:

 

Greenman

Lifer
Oct 15, 1999
22,254
6,441
136
Your entire point (goalpost) gets moved as soon as it is pointed out to be misinformed. Funny, that. :rolleyes:
That's incorrect. I don't believe we need more mind altering drugs, or a simplified method of obtaining them.

You can be as obtuse as you like, that doesn't change what I've said.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pohemi

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
26,067
24,396
136
Mind altering drugs such as psychedelics should be mandated to anybody who says they would vote for Trump again. Our only hope is their tiny regressive fucked up minds open up a bit with the help of the drug and they start to question their decision making.
 

Pohemi

Lifer
Oct 2, 2004
10,882
16,963
146
You can be as obtuse as you like, that doesn't change what I've said.
I don't have to change what you've said, because you can't even keep it straight yourself. You can't even keep your bleating organized.

You say "the entire point" is such and such until I explained why your opinion wasn't a reasonable one, and you immediately reply with a claim that "the entire point" is now something entirely different than what you stated in your previous post.

It's clear that you have no valid point, you just like to see yourself make empty and idiotic claims.
 

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,110
11,287
136
I don't live in or visit Europe. My knowledge of European laws, prohibitions and ethics is as limited as your knowledge of the United States.
And none of that is relevant to the greater point. It's just you doing your ignore the stuff that doesn't support your point and hope that no one notices again. That's not a way to make public policy. The real world doesn't care if you are butt hurt an ignoring stuff because it doesn't agree with you.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,875
10,222
136
Make heroin legal. Properly legal. And you are going to end up with soft drinks with it in with massive corporations pushing it.
Monster energy drinks with smack in anyone?
Well, I think it's obvious that heroin isn't going to be legalized in any way without some regulation in tandem. Dumping it in soft drinks I figure is only in some dystopian novel or movie.

Edit: I had a vague notion that Coca Cola used to have cocaine in it but never looked it up until just now. Yes it did:

 
Last edited:

WelshBloke

Lifer
Jan 12, 2005
33,110
11,287
136
Well, I think it's obvious that heroin isn't going to be legalized in any way without some regulation in tandem. Dumping it in soft drinks I figure is only in some dystopian novel or movie.

Edit: I had a vague notion that Coca Cola used to have cocaine in it but never looked it up until just now. Yes it did:

That's the point. You make something legal, well then it's legal. No reason not to put it in drinks.

Now if you are talking about having a strong state control over something that's different.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Pohemi

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
40,875
10,222
136
That's the point. You make something legal, well then it's legal. No reason not to put it in drinks.

Now if you are talking about having a strong state control over something that's different.
Yes, my point was that heroin wouldn't be legalized without massive controls imposed. It is, in a way, with methadone, and I think there may be programs where addicts are allowed some heroin under supervision in order to control their trajectory and reduce the crime associated with it, but I don't follow those things.