- Oct 10, 1999
- 9,558
- 0
- 76
In Okinawa, 100Mbps fiber connection for 70 US bucks a month. 245 dollar setup fee to run a fiber line.
http://www.sunny-net.ne.jp/?p=internet
http://www.sunny-net.ne.jp/?p=internet
Originally posted by: Lord Evermore
piss off. it's still damn cheap, disregarding all other issues.
and I still blame executives for everything. along with politicians of course.
Originally posted by: Colt45
Population density is only part of it. Being capable of raping the ****** out of people for communications is the other half
Originally posted by: sdifox
Population Density of NYC is like ten times higher than Okinawa (which is considered rural in Japan lol). Why can't you get 100 mbps fibre at decent prices in NYC?
I can understand the lack of FTTP/FTTH in cow country, but the urban centres definitely have the density for it.
Originally posted by: fLum0x
who cares....?
mine is fast enough as is IMO
Originally posted by: sdifox
Population Density of NYC is like ten times higher than Okinawa (which is considered rural in Japan lol). Why can't you get 100 mbps fibre at decent prices in NYC?
I can understand the lack of FTTP/FTTH in cow country, but the urban centres definitely have the density for it.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Most developed countries around the world consider electricity, water and the internets as essentials, the U.S. they are only for the rich.
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: sdifox
Population Density of NYC is like ten times higher than Okinawa (which is considered rural in Japan lol). Why can't you get 100 mbps fibre at decent prices in NYC?
I can understand the lack of FTTP/FTTH in cow country, but the urban centres definitely have the density for it.
QFT
Originally posted by: BigJ
Originally posted by: Thraxen
Originally posted by: sdifox
Population Density of NYC is like ten times higher than Okinawa (which is considered rural in Japan lol). Why can't you get 100 mbps fibre at decent prices in NYC?
I can understand the lack of FTTP/FTTH in cow country, but the urban centres definitely have the density for it.
QFT
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/feb2003/tc2003024_5123_tc103.htm
An older article, but it gets the point across.
Asia's good timing will probably pay off for years to come. By the time Asian companies got serious about broadband they could buy much better gear for as little as 20% of what their U.S. counterparts paid.
Originally posted by: giantpinkbunnyhead
Just wondering how many people even need that kind of internet speed? I feel spoiled stupid with my 10M internet for $39... in ALASKA no less. And the problems I have with speed (if they're even problems at all) is not that I can't download fast enough but that the site I'm downloading from, won't UPLOAD fast enough. (is that the right word?) So what more would a faster download do for me if sites XYZ and ABC can't upload as fast?
I wonder if these speeds of 100M over there in Okinawa are actually useful.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Most developed countries around the world consider electricity, water and the internets as essentials, the U.S. they are only for the rich.
I've noticed you say a lot of really stupid things. :thumbsup:
I'm not going to disagree with you, because when faced with the facts which prove you wrong you never respond.
Originally posted by: mugs
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Most developed countries around the world consider electricity, water and the internets as essentials, the U.S. they are only for the rich.
I've noticed you say a lot of really stupid things.