• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

HIV returns in two bone-marrow patients

Status
Not open for further replies.
Doppel

Doppel

Lifer
If you may remember, a guy with HIV who had a bone-marrow transplant was "cured" of HIV. That remains the case; it's still not detectable in him 6 years later:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/af...TA?docId=0e45a9c1-25e5-49fe-8329-cb2a11b9dc8f

However, two men recently who had bone-marrow transplants and initially showed no signs of HIV have been found to have it after all.

"The return of detectable levels of HIV in our patients is disappointing, but scientifically significant," said Timothy Heinrich, a physician-researcher in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston.
"Through this research we have discovered the HIV reservoir is deeper and more persistent than previously known," he said in a statement sent to AFP.
Click to expand...

As for commentary I don't really have one, save to say this is an interesting treatment approach that has shown to not be quite as powerful as initially hoped.
 
Jimzz said:
That's sucks. I wonder if its the same strain or it mutated and then came back?
Click to expand...

Greenman said:
Couldn't it be a new infection? I assume that after being cured these folks enjoyed an active sex life.
Click to expand...

The case that was originally cured by a bone-marrow transplant involved a donor that had a rare mutation that makes it incredibly difficult for HIV to infect cells. These new donors did not have those mutations, but it was hoped that when the new cells were made, it would be like a new infection that you could quickly suppress and kill off with anti-retroviral therapy.

Like Herpes, HIV can mix its genetic material with the host's genetic material, and if it's hiding in non-bone marrow created cells, it could re-emerge as what happened here.
 
Doppel said:
If you may remember, a guy with HIV who had a bone-marrow transplant was "cured" of HIV. That remains the case; it's still not detectable in him 6 years later:

http://www.google.com/hostednews/af...TA?docId=0e45a9c1-25e5-49fe-8329-cb2a11b9dc8f

However, two men recently who had bone-marrow transplants and initially showed no signs of HIV have been found to have it after all.



As for commentary I don't really have one, save to say this is an interesting treatment approach that has shown to not be quite as powerful as initially hoped.
Click to expand...

The one dude in Berlin who had a bone marrow transplant also had a rare CCR5 mutation, which made his T-cells resistant to HIV infection. Other people who get transplants are therefore unlikely to be cured like him.
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
There's research ongoing for ways to do these types of things, but creating a demonstrated safe and effective treatment is decades away.
Click to expand...
One also has to wonder what side effects there may be. For example, the mutation that makes some blacks less susceptible to malaria also makes them more susceptible to sickle cell anemia. If this mutation becomes more common, it may also have negative side effects.
 
werepossum said:
One also has to wonder what side effects there may be. For example, the mutation that makes some blacks less susceptible to malaria also makes them more susceptible to sickle cell anemia. If this mutation becomes more common, it may also have negative side effects.
Click to expand...

"What happens next", my mantra.

No one knows what will happen when a fix like this is attempted. Sure you can do animal studies, but if they were accurate then we'd all be living perfectly healthy lives and stay young for half a millenia. Look at what can be done with mice.

What if this was done and it was found that untreatable cancers formed a decade down the road? Whoever came up with the treatment would be destroyed, with many of those who call for their head on a platter being the ones who would complain that no one wants a cure because it's more profitable to have a treatment. Then what if a safe and effective treatment were found later? Oops, you die anyway. Sorry.

This isn't an easy sort of problem to deal from a scientific, technical or legal perspective. Still, people will keep trying and one day there will be a solution. This isn't as hard a thing as flu or the common cold in that regard.
 
Hayabusa Rider said:
"What happens next", my mantra.

No one knows what will happen when a fix like this is attempted. Sure you can do animal studies, but if they were accurate then we'd all be living perfectly healthy lives and stay young for half a millenia. Look at what can be done with mice.

What if this was done and it was found that untreatable cancers formed a decade down the road? Whoever came up with the treatment would be destroyed, with many of those who call for their head on a platter being the ones who would complain that no one wants a cure because it's more profitable to have a treatment. Then what if a safe and effective treatment were found later? Oops, you die anyway. Sorry.

This isn't an easy sort of problem to deal from a scientific, technical or legal perspective. Still, people will keep trying and one day there will be a solution. This isn't as hard a thing as flu or the common cold in that regard.
Click to expand...
All true.

On the bright side, we're well on our way to creating a race of immortal white mice. So, you know, if we ever need that, we're golden.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top