- Feb 5, 2011
- 13,306
- 3
- 0
If you may remember, a guy with HIV who had a bone-marrow transplant was "cured" of HIV. That remains the case; it's still not detectable in him 6 years later:
http://www.google.com/hostednews/af...TA?docId=0e45a9c1-25e5-49fe-8329-cb2a11b9dc8f
However, two men recently who had bone-marrow transplants and initially showed no signs of HIV have been found to have it after all.
As for commentary I don't really have one, save to say this is an interesting treatment approach that has shown to not be quite as powerful as initially hoped.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/af...TA?docId=0e45a9c1-25e5-49fe-8329-cb2a11b9dc8f
However, two men recently who had bone-marrow transplants and initially showed no signs of HIV have been found to have it after all.
"The return of detectable levels of HIV in our patients is disappointing, but scientifically significant," said Timothy Heinrich, a physician-researcher in the Division of Infectious Diseases at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston.
"Through this research we have discovered the HIV reservoir is deeper and more persistent than previously known," he said in a statement sent to AFP.
As for commentary I don't really have one, save to say this is an interesting treatment approach that has shown to not be quite as powerful as initially hoped.
