Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy Opens Today!

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Jan 18, 2001
14,465
1
0
it was good, not great.

true to the books, but really only a sample of what the books have to offer.

Zaphod was interesting, though the way they did the heads wasn't very inspired. Marvin wasn't nearly as funny as in the books.

 

RaiderJ

Diamond Member
Apr 29, 2001
7,582
1
76
Originally posted by: BriGy86
should i read the book first?

I listened to the audiobook before I went and saw the movie. I thought the movie was pretty darn good, certainly better than what the reviews had said.
 

SagaLore

Elite Member
Dec 18, 2001
24,036
21
81
I was a little dissapointed.

I read the book prior to watching the movie, but, I tried to watch the movie as if I had never read the book. Some of the questions my wife had confirmed what I thought of the movie as soomeone who had not read the book.

I think many parts it was too rushed, especially the narrator - he can of speedtalked through some very important explanations. There are many parts they should have taken out that weren't vital to the story, and many parts they should have spent more time on that were extremely vital to the story.

edit:
*SPOILERS*

Ways to make this movie better:

1. The whole dolphin intro was a waste of time. Mention it, but move on.
2. The guy that played Ford - he was really weak. It was like he was reading a script, rather than talking to Arthur and Zaphod.
3. In the movie Zaphod stole the ship to find the question to the ultimate answer. Now this is where they stray from the book - but I think this was a bad move. The little recording cube he had clearly stated that Deep Thought didn't know and would build another organic computer to find out - so what do they do, they go and talk to Deep Thought who tells them the obvious. Really stupid!
4. The whole arch nemesis guy they ended up seeing, in order to get coordinates to the planet they're looking for - it was gratuitous. The lost planet they are looking for DOESN'T HAVE COORDINATES, which is the whole point of needing the improbability drive.
5. When Ford and Arthur were rescued, only for a brief moment do you see them as sofas. They could have at least spent an extra minute transitioning around different abnormal and improbable scenarios - followed by a more in-depth explanation of how the improbability drive works. Besides the Hitchiker's Guide, this is probably the most important part of the story!
6. Speaking of the guide - it was really lame how they introduced it so casually by Arthur while he was lying on the ground on the Vogon ship. They really needed to emphasize this guide and what Ford had to do with it.
7. What was the point of that dark haired lady who kept sending the Volgons after the Zaphod - then in the end, she's smooching Zaphod. Even my wife wanted to know what was up with that.
8. I didn't like the ending with them restoring Earth 2, complete with all the people that previously blew up, as if nothing ever happened. I just found it lame.
9. The part about the Nuclear warhead missiles turning into a spermwhale and a bowl of pansies(?) - the whole first person narration of the whale was annoying. Yes it was in the book, but the narration was so anxiously rushed that it would be better to have just taken it out.

It was a long movie, and I like long movies, but the only reason it was long because they added unnecessary scenes and then made up on time by rushing the important scenes.

It was a good movie but not great.
 

randomlinh

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,846
2
0
linh.wordpress.com
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
And why in the hell was Zaphods second head 'evil'. Bad... plus it should have been side by side rather than below. :(

yeah, i think they were trying to get to the whole "locked part of my brain" story, but they never really explained much on that.. it was just kind of thrown in there.



 

Turkey22

Senior member
Nov 28, 2001
840
0
0
Doesn't really contain specific spoilers, just general observations.


I totally agree that Zaphod's second head was disappointing. I read somewhere they were going to do something similar to what they did in Men in Black 2 but they obviously didn't finish it first so decided to change it up.

Mos Def was much better than I had feared. The dialogue was butchered, I thought mainly for constraints, but the bulldozer scene could have easily been done correctly as well as the foremans hat (didn't have to explain the hat, just put it in please). The added content and changes were pretty good. Btw the only things that people laughed at in the full theatre were the added bits. Most of the funny stuff from the book received chuckles. The vogon portrayal threw me off at the beginning, as I imagined them a bit more sinister, but by the end seemed much more the way they were meant to be. It made me kinda sad to see them leave it open for the next book like that as I'm pretty sure they wont make another. Well off to rent the tv series as I saw it in Blockbuster the other day.
 

geecee

Platinum Member
Jan 14, 2003
2,383
43
91
Originally posted by: lnguyen
I was a little disappointed in the movie. It veered a bit. Granted, it's nice to see Trillian in a shower scene (anyone else find Zooey Deschanel mysteriously attractive?)... but how it ends... eh. The restaurant at the end of the universe isn't on any side dammit.

I gotta admit tho, I loved marvin.. ha. I guess I didn't know what to expect, it seemed like it would be rather difficult to make the book into a movie... so much explaining needed.
But she was already in a shower scene in Elf. ;) :p Love her voice.
Mixed reviews here and everywhere else it seems. As a big fan of the books, I really wanted to see it, and I was hoping that the reviews would be so good that I would have no choice. But my schedule these days allows for about 6 movies a year (in the theater). My bi-monthly movie will have to wait until SW3. I'll get it as soon as it comes out on DVD though.
 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
Originally posted by: Sheik Yerbouti
Is the TV version better?


well, define better.
true to the book? yes
done in the queen's english? yes
a bit too slow, and done with a budget of about 15 bucks? yes
 

neonerd

Diamond Member
Apr 24, 2003
8,746
1
0
just saw it...

Didn't expect any better of Disney to be quite honest...in my opinion the movie was directed VERY poorly, and steered away from the book quite a bit. The TV version was SO much better. I :heart: the TV version as well as the book itself. I wouldn't waste my time on this mobie...

EDIT: I wonder how much Nokia paid Disney to flash their classy phone so much :roll:

Also, If I remember correctly, Upon being rescued, Ford turned into a penguin; not a talking couch :confused:

and WTF, zaphod has one strangely deformed head with two faces?? :roll:
 

nakedfrog

No Lifer
Apr 3, 2001
62,283
18,164
136
Say, did anyone else stay through the credits and see their inclusion of the bit about how Arthur's comment about his fluffy towel went through a wormhole and drifted across the table where the two leaders were wearing their jeweled battleshorts?
It was cool to see that make it in, even if it was during the credits.

And again, it's not supposed to be exactly like the book, which was not exactly like the radio series which came BEFORE the book, and not exactly like the TV series which came after both.
 

Armitage

Banned
Feb 23, 2001
8,086
0
0
Originally posted by: UNCjigga
I saw it earlier tonight. If the chick playing Trillian was hotter (Elizabeth Hurley) and if Jim Carrey were playing Zaphod this would have been a much better movie.

Hadn't thought about that - Jim Carrey would make a great Zaphod! Anyway, I'll probably go see it this weekend.

 

randomlinh

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
20,846
2
0
linh.wordpress.com
Originally posted by: geecee
But she was already in a shower scene in Elf. ;) :p Love her voice.
Mixed reviews here and everywhere else it seems. As a big fan of the books, I really wanted to see it, and I was hoping that the reviews would be so good that I would have no choice. But my schedule these days allows for about 6 movies a year (in the theater). My bi-monthly movie will have to wait until SW3. I'll get it as soon as it comes out on DVD though.

shoot... I guess I have to see Elf now :p From the screen caps tho, she's dirty blonde in that? I like her better w/ the dark hair :)

 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Say, did anyone else stay through the credits and see their inclusion of the bit about how Arthur's comment about his fluffy towel went through a wormhole and drifted across the table where the two leaders were wearing their jeweled battleshorts?
It was cool to see that make it in, even if it was during the credits.

And again, it's not supposed to be exactly like the book, which was not exactly like the radio series which came BEFORE the book, and not exactly like the TV series which came after both.



Uh, Douglas wrote the books, which were picked up as a BBC radio show, then BBC TV.
 

Aves

Lifer
Feb 7, 2001
12,232
30
101
Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
Uh, Douglas wrote the books, which were picked up as a BBC radio show, then BBC TV.

I'm pretty sure that the radio show came first.
 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
Originally posted by: nakedfrog
Say, did anyone else stay through the credits and see their inclusion of the bit about how Arthur's comment about his fluffy towel went through a wormhole and drifted across the table where the two leaders were wearing their jeweled battleshorts?
It was cool to see that make it in, even if it was during the credits.

And again, it's not supposed to be exactly like the book, which was not exactly like the radio series which came BEFORE the book, and not exactly like the TV series which came after both.



i stand corrected.
 

BRObedoza

Diamond Member
Apr 16, 2004
4,133
0
76
just saw it. didn't know anything about the book. the movie was aaaaaight. nothing i'd want to see again.
 

jonnyGURU

Moderator <BR> Power Supplies
Moderator
Oct 30, 1999
11,815
104
106
Ok. Now that I've finally seen it (it took me a week to get a babysitter).... Here's my take.....

First, my background.... Big Adams fan. Actually read the Hitchhiker's Guide books as they came out. I also had all of the Infocom games, the radio show on MP3, the TV series on VHS, the Complete book in leather bound and the "Illustrated Guide" (big book with large color photos.)

I also have read Dirk Gently, Dark Tea Time, played Starship Titanic and have Terry Jone's adaption of the game to novel.

I understand that Douglas Adams put forth a "concept" and that it's perfectly suitable for the movie to NOT follow the book, radio show or TV show. I also realize the writing of this movie was 20 years in the making with Douglas dying half way through the process. I also "get" British humor. Big Monty Python fan, in fact. Have all of the DVD's of the Flying Circuis and the movies.

That said... I have to say that I was disappointed.

Why?

The writing of the new storyline was great. The special effects were awesome. I loved everything from the talking sofa's to the Vogon's going in and out of warp, the Vogon's super boom microphone, Zaphod's two heads, Humma's legs, Marvin... It was all great!

The little "Hitchhiker's Guide" animated segments were perfect.

Since it's Douglas Adams, naturally there's going to be campiness. I EXPECT camp. Did I mention talking sofa's? Every time the Heart of Gold went into Improbability Overdrive, the audience chuckled with the results. The yarn one got a good LOL out of me.

It was the ACTING that ruined EVERYTHING.

They should have doubled the budget and gotten people that could act.

Everyone sounded like they were DRUNK! Slurring speech, stumbling over lines. Bad cominc timing.

Sam Rockwell as Zaphod was ok. But Robin Williams or Jim Carrey or some off-the-wall hyper character actor would have made it. Martin Freeman as Arthur Dent was the only good acting... and that's not saying much. Zooey Deschanel is "cute" as Trillian, but her acting was downright annoying. And don't even get me started with Mos Def as Ford. He got WORSE as the movie wore on. The only thing he did that made me laugh is when Ford and Zaphod drank a Pangalactic Gargleblaster, the narrator said it was like getting hit in the head with a lemon wrapped around a brick and then Zaphod and Ford let out a WHOO HOO! like they just took a shot of pure evil.

Also, it seemed like the target audience was JUST Hitchhiker's fans. I was watching the movie thinking, "There's going to be people that don't get parts of this." Right off the bat, the whole Ford and Arthur thing went by WAY too fast. Whizz right by the demolition of Arthur's house, really no detailed explaination as to WHY Ford was guzzling the beers and eating the peanuts (although I like how they added giving the beer to the construction crew to buy time.) It took a while to get into the explaination of the Improbability Drive, although they did talk about "Improbability" a bit. They missed the whole "Non-Existence of God QED" and when the whale was falling from the sky.. he's reciting his lines at a mile a minute! As if he KNEW he was dying as soon as he hit the ground, which OBVIOUSLY the whale DOESN'T know or he wouldn't try to make friends with the ground!!!!

So there's the whole "inside joke" thing going on, and I thought, "Maybe the bad acting is a part of the inside joke that I just don't get."

I was starting to think it was an aspect of British humor that I must have outgrown and then Bill Nighy as Slartibartfast came on the screen. He was bad too. And what made him worse was his attempt at the whole "Errr... Uhh... Umm.. No...I mean YES!" confused Brit type of comedy that Monty Python is famous for. Nobody could do that sort of "slap stick" as well as Monty Python's Micheal Palin. I came to the conclusion that nobody does it worse than Bill Nighy. Can you imagine Michael Palin delivering the line, "You'll be late, as in the Late Dent Arthur Dent."? That would have been so AWESOME!

So at that moment, it dawned on me. I wasn't missing anything. I wasn't on the outside of the inside joke. The cast just SUCKED! Such a shame too. Thank GOD the effects were so good or I would've been PISSED!

For Hitchhiker fans it's a must see. Not a Hitchhiker fan? Don't bother. Rent the DVD when it comes out. You'll love some of the slapstick (who else liked the spatula-like creatures that flipped up out of the mud and whacked everyone in the face?) and the special effects. But in a theatre, the acting will just make you squirm in your seat. Read the book so you have a clue as to what's going on. The paperback of the first novel is all you need.

Watching this movie wants me to bust out the old TV series. The acting is actually WORSE in the TV series and the special effects are LAME, but the story is easy to follow because it's not going 500 MPH with more holes than a piece of swiss cheese.

 

Armitage

Banned
Feb 23, 2001
8,086
0
0
Saw it last night - it sucked completely :(
The only good bit was the spatula things slapping them in the face. They should have kept that up through the whole movie every time somebody opened their mouth to speak - the acting was horrible.

I love the books, but didn't expect the movie to be really true to the books. It's not possible, there's to much internal dialoge, asides, etc. to make that work. When they did try to work that in it just came across as a kludge. It just seemed that they missed the whole feel of the characters.

I'm off to find my copy and reread it - and try to expunge this version from my brain.