brycejones
Lifer
- Oct 18, 2005
- 26,141
- 24,078
- 136
You're fighting for your chosen team. Ensuring the law, as it has been used to crush non-elites, does not apply to the rich and powerful. You want them above the law.
First Dems pretended Classified documents didn't exist, or she didn't send them.
Comey proved she sent / revived them, because it is beyond dispute.
Comey pretended intent did not exist.
Intent most certainly does exist.
Her crimes are beyond dispute if one simply looks at the facts. The FBI spelled them out, they merely left out a blatantly obvious piece that I remind you of today. No one in their right mind thinks she didn't intend to transmit non secure, especially in her own words. But again, your team must be above the law. So you'll deflect and propagandize as you have done from the beginning when you argued she never sent any.
Shall you respond with the usual toxicity? I expect your argument to be... lax.
Psychological projection is a theory in psychology in which humans defend themselves against their own unconscious impulses or qualities (both positive and negative) by denying their existence in themselves while attributing them to others.[1] For example, a person who is habitually rude may constantly accuse other people of being rude. It incorporates blame shifting.
According to some research, the projection of one's unconscious qualities onto others is a common process in everyday life.
Psychobabble (a portmanteau of "psychology" or "psychoanalysis" and "babble") is a form of speech or writing that uses psychological jargon, buzzwords, and esoteric language to create an impression of truth or plausibility. The term implies that the speaker or writer lacks the experience and understanding necessary for the proper use of psychological terms. Additionally, it may imply that the content of speech deviates markedly from common sense and good judgement.
That may look more suspicious than it is. It depends on why it was classified. If the memo contains classified information, and that information was not removed, then yes, it is a crime to send it or request that its header be stripped. If the memo contains classified information, and that information was removed, then depending on the information it might not be a crime to send it or request it. (For some subjects and classifications, every single word is classified at that level.) And sometimes talking points are classified only because the government does not want others to know its strategy ahead of time, to maximize leverage. In that case, stripping off its identifying header might technically make it not a crime, even though anyone intercepting it would automatically know that it represents the government's position because it's being sent to the Secretary of State. Although in that case, one could argue that the SecState's need to know what is her position overrides the possibility of some other actor learning that position simultaneously. If the other side knows what she is going to say, obviously she is at a severe disadvantage, but without the memo she would be unable to argue at all since she is there to do Obama's will, not her own.Oh, btw... we established intent a long time ago. IN THIS VERY THREAD.
Clinton responds, "If they can't, turn into nonpaper w no identifying heading and send nonsecure."
And involving others makes it felony conspiracy with intent to commit these crimes.
You apparently don't know what the word "devalued" means. Saying something is flat or not rising as fast as something else does not mean it has been devalued.
Inflation is also not going up and has also been relatively flat.
Middle-class wage earners with pension funds have prospered some from the stock bonanza, but the overwhelming share of the benefit accrued to those who trade or own most of the stocks: the well-heeled bankers on Wall Street and their wealthy clients, as well as the elite corps of corporate executives who derive most of their income from stock grants and options.
Billionaires prosper
As a result, Wall Street once again is in the midst of a major boom, with the biggest concentration of billionaires on earth. Meanwhile, average wages for middle-class workers have grown by 2 percent or less since the depths of the recession in 2009, barely keeping up with inflation. The gap between the rich and the middle class has reached levels not seen since the Gilded Age of the late 19th century.
Mr. Obama recently called this growing inequality the “defining challenge of our time” and vowed to remedy it through a raft of measures such as raising the minimum wage, increasing worker training, and fostering good-paying middle-class jobs in infrastructure and manufacturing. He gained a partial victory in his battle to make the rich sacrifice more with the end of some of Mr. Bush’s tax cuts a year ago.
But most of the president’s remedies face daunting opposition from Republicans in Congress. Even if Mr. Obama secures approval, economists say, his proposals would do little to overcome powerful market forces that enable the affluent to reap most of the gains from financial markets and from the mechanization and globalization of the economy that have shifted millions of middle-class jobs from the U.S. to the developing world.
Apparently you don't recognize the problem with most of the economic gains since 2008 going to a few people instead of being spread out a bit more....
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jan/13/obama-economic-policies-fail-to-turn-trends-hurtin/
Inflation may be low but when the averages wages for middle-class workers are struggling to keep up with even a low rate of inflation while the economy has been "recovering" (in quotes because in depends on who you are if you reap the benefits of it) there is a problem and devalued is a valid term.
______________
Perhaps, instead of arguing against points no one has made, you should acknowledge your error and adjust your point accordingly.
Hillary gets away with it.
Again.
Yeh, she should have been stopped after she killed Vince Foster.
Hillary gets away with it.
Again.
Hillary gets away with it.
Again.
Don't worry. Those geniuses is Congress will get her. They are excellent at investigating things.
Yeh, she should have been stopped after she killed Vince Foster.
Who Had the Records?
Investigators have examined the Rose billing records not only to determine the role Hillary Clinton may have played in the Castle Grande transactions, but more significantly to ascertain her role in their mysterious disappearance and subsquent reappearance.
If someone had knowledge or possession of the billing records and knew that they were the subject of Federal investigative subpoenas, their failure to divulge or turn over the records could be the basis for criminal charges -- the obstruction of justice. The billing records found in Hillary Clinton's book room were a copy of an original version printed out from the Rose Firm computer in 1992, when the computer file itself was deleted.
Hillary was too busy doctoring, hiding and eventually "misplacing" Rose Law Firm billing records to cover up misdeeds. What else could explain her overnight $100,000 profit in cattle futures that helped fund her White Water land bonanza that led to the failure of savings and loan?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/arkansas/docs/recs.html
The great thing about conspiracy theorists is that they always have backup mindfuck reaching back for decades. It's a grassy knoll kinda thing.
Hillary was too busy doctoring, hiding and eventually "misplacing" Rose Law Firm billing records to cover up misdeeds. What else could explain her overnight $100,000 profit in cattle futures that helped fund her White Water land bonanza that led to the failure of savings and loan?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/arkansas/docs/recs.html
You apparently don't know what the word "devalued" means. Saying something is flat or not rising as fast as something else does not mean it has been devalued.
Inflation is also not going up and has also been relatively flat.
I know. And the worst part is that its government funded, you know a link from pbs.org detailing some of the dirty dealing the Clintons have been involved in.
One scandal / investigation after another. So much so in fact they had to set up a special legal defense fund when they were first in the White House, to which the government of China gave nearly $1,000,000.
Hillary Clinton - dirty from day one.