• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Hillary Clinton Wears $12,495 Armani Jacket During Speech About Inequality

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I think Hillary could expose state secrets to any 3rd rate hacker and lie about it over and over and her supporters wouldn't care.
 
buckshot24 said:
I think Hillary could expose state secrets to any 3rd rate hacker and lie about it over and over and her supporters wouldn't care.
Click to expand...

And the right could be told that the Clinton's murdered one of their friends and the right would believe it.

Have you ever heard of the phrase, crying wolf?
 
drumpf spews hatred and vitriol on a daily basis.. *crickets*

Hillary wore a $12k jacket to a speech about wealth inequality, SEE!! I TOLD YOU SHE WAS A HORRIBLE PERSON!!!
OMFG!
One would think that a presidential candidate displaying blatant racism would be more of an issue that a dumb wardrobe mistake. Then again, consider the people he attracts, not really all that surprising actually.
tumblr_o03qydYaL01qzz40io1_400.jpg
 
bozack said:
Choice between Trump and hitlery is simple, anyone but her.

If she is stupid enough to sport a 12K jacket paid for on our dime then you're that much stupider for supporting her.

As I said before, at least other presidents knew their audience and were aware that overly showy displays of wealth given that they were mostly career politicians is beyond stupid....as another mentioned it is all about the optics and its impossible for folks to relate with 13K jackets and 40K handbags.

But sure tell me she can still "relate and sympathize" http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/06/psychology-of-wealth_n_4531905.html

http://archive.boston.com/lifestyle/fashion/gallery/brownjacket/

With Trump you can bleat on and on about bankruptcy, working the system to his advantage, or being the result of a successful parent, but the perception isn't that he has been in the system benefiting from public funds...Hillary is a life long civil servant...wearing a 13K coat.
Click to expand...

Goddamn you dumb rightwingers are desperate. I guess being stupid and angry does that.
 
buckshot24 said:
I think Hillary could expose state secrets to any 3rd rate hacker and lie about it over and over and her supporters wouldn't care.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't...because the alternative is trump, and I'm not a middle age white male, so I can't enjoy the version of America that trump wants.
 
Ns1 said:
I wouldn't...because the alternative is trump, and I'm not a middle age white male, so I can't enjoy the version of America that trump wants.
Click to expand...

As a white middle aged male I could say the same thing about the America that Hillary wants as well as Donald's.
 
The sheep will still follow. Instead of critically thinking about how out of touch or elitist a person would have to be to wear a jacket of that cost, followers will overlook and keep illogically getting all hot and bothered when the name Hillary Clinton is spoken...

Same thing for Trump or Bernie or whomever... They are politicians and they lie so they can rule over other people... Or they believe it's their right to rule others... and that's an idea older than the world. Everybody wants to rule the world.
 
bozack said:
With Trump you can bleat on and on about bankruptcy, working the system to his advantage, or being the result of a successful parent, but the perception isn't that he has been in the system benefiting from public funds...Hillary is a life long civil servant...wearing a 13K coat.
Click to expand...

Not even close. I think she had some kind of chair position for several years when her husband was gov. plus 1 full and one partial term as senator (8 years) and one term as Sec of State (4 years). First elected to office in 2000. Taught and was in private law for roughly 20 years where she made more money than Bill did as gov.

Keep flailing, it's amusing.
 
glenn1 said:
As a white middle aged male I could say the same thing about the America that Hillary wants as well as Donald's.
Click to expand...

Exactly. So we'll see who wins in November, the (heterosexual) middle aged white males or everyone else.
 
So Trump is bad and Hillary is bad and which one's the worse is debatable.

In that case, we the electorate should demand a referendum such that the Repubs should be the ones to pick the Dem candidate with the condition that he/she has been a faithful party member for a minimum of 10 years and the Dems get to pick the Repub candidate under those same conditions.

In this way there should be no argument from each side as to the qualifications of each one, then let the fur fly at will.

Yes, tongue in cheek, but it sure would be fun to see what happens.
 
ivwshane said:
Good, now back it up.
Click to expand...
Tell me what facts you disagree with.

  • Used a private server for work related emails.
  • She received information that was classified through her server.
  • Used a private blackberry for her communications via the private server for work related emails.
  • Claimed, falsely, that the FBI was conducting a security review.
  • Said she would talk to anybody about her emails but refused to talk to the IG of the State Department.
  • Falsely claimed that Colin Powell did the same thing.

Lets start from there. Do you dispute any of these facts?
 
I admit, that's a pretty stupid move on her part. Shows some disconnect.....

But what am I supposed to do, vote for Trump now? LOL.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top