jonks
Lifer
- Feb 7, 2005
- 13,918
- 20
- 81
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Democratic voters watch O'Reilly's show?
That's news to me.
Before the gym. It gets you really pumped and angry.
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Democratic voters watch O'Reilly's show?
That's news to me.
Originally posted by: bamacre
Obama has the nomination wrapped up.
Originally posted by: venkman
Something Like This
-------------------------
Bill: If elected president, how will you open the country to terrorist actions.
Hillary: I won-
Bill: How can you say that, thousands of American people will die if you become president
Hillary: That is redicu-
Bill: It is ridiculous that George W Bush can't serve a third term.
Hillary: But--
Bill: Are you actually saying that America is to blame for 9/11?
so on and so forth.
Originally posted by: Perry404
Senator Hillary Clinton will appear for the first time ever on The O'Reilly Factor(date unknown). How do you think this event will proceed?
I tend to believe that the far right republicans like O'Reilly and the far left democrats like Hillary have both gone so far that they are actually rubbing shoulders. This is going to be a wimpy ass interview and Bill might as well be kissing Hillary because he knows in reality that his agenda differs very little from hers.
Originally posted by: m1ldslide1
Originally posted by: Perry404
Senator Hillary Clinton will appear for the first time ever on The O'Reilly Factor(date unknown). How do you think this event will proceed?
I tend to believe that the far right republicans like O'Reilly and the far left democrats like Hillary have both gone so far that they are actually rubbing shoulders. This is going to be a wimpy ass interview and Bill might as well be kissing Hillary because he knows in reality that his agenda differs very little from hers.
Weird. I was watching a Chomsky documentary the other day where he talked about how the MSM paints the 'far left' or 'liberals' in contemporary politics, and how as a voter you're essentially bracketed between them and the repubs. Me, I consider both parties to essentially serve the same purpose - preservation of the system which benefits the very few and the expense of the many. Therefore since I fall outside of the conventional bracket, I'm a nutjob or a communist and not to be taken seriously. As is Nader, Zinn, Chomsky himself, or anyone else pointing out what should be the obvious truth. The obvious truth would be harmful to the system, so therefore you have the bracket. This is all assuming I interpreted Chomsky correctly.
In other words, I don't really care about this 'showdown', because nobody will get any smarter as a result and nobody except the MSM and powerful interests stand to gain anything.
Originally posted by: tweaker2
geeez... i didn't know she was that desperate.
i'm certain the ground rules have been ironed out in smallest detail by both sides before each would even think about meeting up on his show. should be a draw, with both claiming victory, and both would be right/wrong depending on whose side the interview is viewed from.
i'd rather see obama joust with o-really instead. the title of this little match-up could be "mental giant vs mental midget".
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: tweaker2
geeez... i didn't know she was that desperate.
i'm certain the ground rules have been ironed out in smallest detail by both sides before each would even think about meeting up on his show. should be a draw, with both claiming victory, and both would be right/wrong depending on whose side the interview is viewed from.
i'd rather see obama joust with o-really instead. the title of this little match-up could be "mental giant vs mental midget".
you may not like oreilly, but to call him a mental midget is just ignorant. he's not a stupid person by anymeans. Unless you were dissing Obama, and I would disagree with that too
Originally posted by: Tab
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: tweaker2
geeez... i didn't know she was that desperate.
i'm certain the ground rules have been ironed out in smallest detail by both sides before each would even think about meeting up on his show. should be a draw, with both claiming victory, and both would be right/wrong depending on whose side the interview is viewed from.
i'd rather see obama joust with o-really instead. the title of this little match-up could be "mental giant vs mental midget".
you may not like oreilly, but to call him a mental midget is just ignorant. he's not a stupid person by anymeans. Unless you were dissing Obama, and I would disagree with that too
Yes, it would be wrong to call him stupid. It'd be correct to call him insane.
Originally posted by: TechBoyJK
Originally posted by: tweaker2
geeez... i didn't know she was that desperate.
i'm certain the ground rules have been ironed out in smallest detail by both sides before each would even think about meeting up on his show. should be a draw, with both claiming victory, and both would be right/wrong depending on whose side the interview is viewed from.
i'd rather see obama joust with o-really instead. the title of this little match-up could be "mental giant vs mental midget".
you may not like oreilly, but to call him a mental midget is just ignorant. he's not a stupid person by anymeans. Unless you were dissing Obama, and I would disagree with that too
Originally posted by: GodlessAstronomer
Watching on Youtube now. How fucking predictable, it starts immediately with a question on Wright.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ejImChJ_DTU
