Hillary Clinton exclusively used personal emails at st dpt

Page 15 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

theeedude

Lifer
Feb 5, 2006
35,787
6,198
126
Whereas pretending that Hillary set up her own private email server only for the convenience of having her aid carry just one device would make me sound smart?

I am just saying there are ways to say things without resorting to calling people lame names like Pokahantas or whatever, and sounding like a retard. Just saying.
 

runzwithsizorz

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2002
3,497
14
76
Don't you get it - there's no evidence she did anything illegal therefore there is no evidence to conceal! Isn't Doublethink awesome!
I'm dating myself here, but I harken back to an 18 minute gap in the Nixon tapes. Nope, no evidence, nothing concealed, no crime, can't we just move along.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,746
17,401
136
I'm dating myself here, but I harken back to an 18 minute gap in the Nixon tapes. Nope, no evidence, nothing concealed, no crime, can't we just move along.

I'm sure you understand the difference between missing evidence of a known committed crime and potential missing evidence and no known crime having been committed. One is based on surrounding circumstances and the other is based on innuendo and wishful thinking.
 

runzwithsizorz

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2002
3,497
14
76
I'm sure you understand the difference between missing evidence of a known committed crime and potential missing evidence and no known crime having been committed. One is based on surrounding circumstances and the other is based on innuendo and wishful thinking.
A crime may very well have been committed. The evidence is not potentially missing, it *IS* missing! When you have a mountain of shredded documents, offices with records burned, a person nearly beaten to death for his records, another murdered, dozens of people fleeing the country, others jailed, millions, and millions of dollars paid in bribes, hush money, cushy jobs given, dozens of people fired, and dozens of very questionable deaths, a media that is told what, and what not to publish, I would say it's a bit more than innuendo.
You people have no idea what this woman is capable of doing, and what she has PLANNED! She will make Madoff look like a philanthropist, Nixon like Mary Poppins, and Marx not such a bad guy after all.
 

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,746
17,401
136
A crime may very well have been committed. The evidence is not potentially missing, it *IS* missing! When you have a mountain of shredded documents, offices with records burned, a person nearly beaten to death for his records, another murdered, dozens of people fleeing the country, others jailed, millions, and millions of dollars paid in bribes, hush money, cushy jobs given, dozens of people fired, and dozens of very questionable deaths, a media that is told what, and what not to publish, I would say it's a bit more than innuendo.
You people have no idea what this woman is capable of doing, and what she has PLANNED! She will make Madoff look like a philanthropist, Nixon like Mary Poppins, and Marx not such a bad guy after all.

Lol! She's a regular dr evil!


You should read this:

http://aeon.co/magazine/philosophy/intellectual-character-of-conspiracy-theorists/
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Unlike your stupid straw man, I give you truth, facts, history, and credible witnesses.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mYW5nmS9ps
Two points:

1. You clearly don't know the meaning of straw man.

2. Your chances of finding something honest and substantive on YouTube are comparable to winning the Powerball jackpot. It can happen ... unless, of course, it's a movie-length attack ad funded by Karl Rove's Citizens United. In that case, it's a certainty that you're slurping purely partisan propaganda, served up to rubes who cannot survive having their faith challenged. You embarrass yourself by citing it as if it means anything.
 

runzwithsizorz

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2002
3,497
14
76
Two points:

1. You clearly don't know the meaning of straw man.

According to Websters, I do. " A weak or imaginary argument or opponent that is set up to be easily defeated. "

2. Your chances of finding something honest and substantive on YouTube are comparable to winning the Powerball jackpot. It can happen ... unless, of course, it's a movie-length attack ad funded by Karl Rove's Citizens United. In that case, it's a certainty that you're slurping purely partisan propaganda, served up to rubes who cannot survive having their faith challenged. You embarrass yourself by citing it as if it means anything.
Typical, shoot the messengers, but don't even address any of the facts. You didn't even watch it. Shameful, at least I am willing to listen to all sides to draw a conclusion.
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
I hear they are pulling her into court for Perjury.

She lies, and lies, and lies.

And she has a chance to be the next President of the United States.

Disgusting.

-John
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Typical, shoot the messengers, but don't even address any of the facts. You didn't even watch it. Shameful, at least I am willing to listen to all sides to draw a conclusion.
Two points:

1. Your misunderstanding of Webster is just as wrong as your misunderstanding of straw man.

2. Any truth found in such blatant propaganda is incidental and generally irrelevant to the topic attacked. Karl Rove is a professional liar, and there is zero reason to give him or his projects any serious consideration. Only the party faithful or fools would waste an hour and half on such drek.

That said, I'm not a Clinton fan. Should you stumble across an objective and credible source with information about her, I am interested. You'll have to look beyond your usual sources, however. Based on your posts here, you've immersed yourself in the nutter disinformation bubble, where you're only exposed to propaganda you already agree with.
 

runzwithsizorz

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2002
3,497
14
76
I hear they are pulling her into court for Perjury.

She lies, and lies, and lies.

And she has a chance to be the next President of the United States.

Disgusting.

-John
Nothing has ever stuck to the Clintons. This little episode is just a bump in the road. Keep in mind, that over half of Americans are stupid, blind, brain washed, on the payroll, or just don't care.
 

MongGrel

Lifer
Dec 3, 2013
38,466
3,067
121
Who gives a shit really, I'm pretty sure Jeb Bush did the whole time he was Gov of Florida.

Here ya go Bro, get in office there Dubya.

:eek:

I seem to remember hanging chads and all kinds of shit in a state that had a Gov doing the same thing, oh wait a minute, after all these years of saying he'd never run for POTUS, he is !!!!!!

Shockers never stop do they.

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
That's a defeatist attitude.

There are those of us that are trying to educate posters to the beauty of the hills of Carolina, or the sweetness of the grass of Tennessee.

-John
 

Zorkorist

Diamond Member
Apr 17, 2007
6,861
3
76
Nothing has ever stuck to the Clintons. This little episode is just a bump in the road. Keep in mind, that over half of Americans are stupid, blind, brain washed, on the payroll, or just don't care.
Hillary is so dirty that hopefully the public will start to understand.

-John
 

runzwithsizorz

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2002
3,497
14
76
Two points:

1. Your misunderstanding of Webster is just as wrong as your misunderstanding of straw man.
Nope, I understand just fine, ivwshane tried to compare me with/to some imaginary person named Oliver who believes in conspiracy theories about 9/11, the spread of AIDS, the 1969 Moon landings, UFOs, the assassination of JFK etc.
2. Any truth found in such blatant propaganda is incidental and generally irrelevant to the topic attacked. Karl Rove is a professional liar, and there is zero reason to give him or his projects any serious consideration. Only the party faithful or fools would waste an hour and half on such drek.

That said, I'm not a Clinton fan. Should you stumble across an objective and credible source with information about her, I am interested. You'll have to look beyond your usual sources, however. Based on your posts here, you've immersed yourself in the nutter disinformation bubble, where you're only exposed to propaganda you already agree with.

Sooo, according to you;
Lawyers, DA's, a state supreme court judge, and senator, state troopers, a state AG, CIA agents, noted investigative journalists, medical examiners, state, and white house staff, etc, are ALL just liars, nutters, and propagandists?????
You don't know me well enough to put a bead on me, or whats in my bubble. Meanwhile you have your work cut out for you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LihB7ZoGf4c
 
Last edited:

ivwshane

Lifer
May 15, 2000
33,746
17,401
136
Sooo, according to you;
Lawyers, DA's, a state supreme court judge, and senator, state troopers, a state AG, CIA agents, noted investigative journalists, medical examiners, state, and white house staff, etc, are ALL just liars, nutters, and propagandists?????
You don't know me well enough to put a bead on me, or whats in my bubble. Meanwhile you have your work cut out for you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LihB7ZoGf4c

Lol! Not only are you a moron who clearly doesn't know what a straw man is, you are also "Oliver". You are gullible and easily fooled as shown by your regurgitated conspiracy bullshit. As pointed out by the article, when told how gullible you are you ignore it, which is why you made some ridiculous claim about me making a straw man argument (it's how you protect yourself sub consciously),

You have some serious character flaws, seek help;)
 

IGBT

Lifer
Jul 16, 2001
17,976
141
106
the only thing that the inch worm liberals are upset about is hillary getting caught..not that she violated state dept.rules / regs. She's a clinton. Illegal activity is a behavioral characteristic.
 

kage69

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
31,736
48,559
136
I hear they are pulling her into court for Perjury.

Disgusting.

-John



I'm relieved we have you keeping everyone up to speed on these cutting insights, and your personal analysis of it all just makes it all the more informative and noteworthy. You must be privy to some amazing sources, not to mention being incredibly well read! Year after year, you and your peers continue to amaze with omniscient-like analysis of policies and events. Just wow, man. Further more I'd like to go on record as stating that your jokes rock, and your hair has body and shine.

What do you say Zork? I think we both know this calls for a toast... :colbert:
 

rudeguy

Lifer
Dec 27, 2001
47,351
14
61
Anyone find any naked pics of Lewinsky?

Not that I want to see them. But I'd look at them.
 

runzwithsizorz

Diamond Member
Jan 24, 2002
3,497
14
76
Anyone find any naked pics of Lewinsky?

Not that I want to see them. But I'd look at them.

Her mom has them safely hidden away in hermetically sealed bags, just in case they are needed one day. It's just what a good Jewish mother does for her daughter :p.
 

Bowfinger

Lifer
Nov 17, 2002
15,776
392
126
Sooo, according to you;
Lawyers, DA's, a state supreme court judge, and senator, state troopers, a state AG, CIA agents, noted investigative journalists, medical examiners, state, and white house staff, etc, are ALL just liars, nutters, and propagandists?????
Now ^that^ is a straw man. The irony! :D

I said nothing of the sort, nor is that a position I've offered.


You don't know me well enough to put a bead on me, or whats in my bubble.
Actions speak louder than words.


Meanwhile you have your work cut out for you.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LihB7ZoGf4c
ibid.