Hillary Clinton destroys Mike Pence

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fear No Evil

Diamond Member
Nov 14, 2008
5,922
0
0
Originally posted by: Lemon law
My reaction is that some of the Hillary would have made a good President crowd fail to understand why Obama won. Obama was always against the Iraq war,
Hillary tried to straddle the fence and pandered to GWB, and that is what gave Obama his opportunity, and that is the #1 reason why Obama won. You can't get it wrong on big things like wars and expect to win.

Hillary probably kicks herself for that political pandering everyday, but when Pense tries the same pandering stunt on Hillary, he done picked on the wrong person who understands that moral weakness of pandering best of all.

Obama was always against the war because he was a community organizer when the war was being talked about. If he were actually someone of influence he would have supported it like everyone else. He can't even come out in favor of gay marriage - You think he would have been able to go against 90% of the country to say he was against the war? Please..

Of course, he is so against it that he has not done a damn thing to change any of Bush's policies.. but keep living in your fantasy land that Obama is against the war.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,648
33,483
136
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: sandorski
She would have made a good President.

She'd look like Reagan next to Obama.

I disagree. I think she would have been a better president than Obama. She just couldn't win the post and Obama could.

Right, because liberals would prefer woman stay in the kitchen..

Clinton spent 16 years in front of the Republican sleaze machine and her negatives were too high to win swing voters. Obama, a relative newcomer, hadn't been buried in Republican lies.
 

her209

No Lifer
Oct 11, 2000
56,336
11
0
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: Lemon law
My reaction is that some of the Hillary would have made a good President crowd fail to understand why Obama won. Obama was always against the Iraq war,
Hillary tried to straddle the fence and pandered to GWB, and that is what gave Obama his opportunity, and that is the #1 reason why Obama won. You can't get it wrong on big things like wars and expect to win.

Hillary probably kicks herself for that political pandering everyday, but when Pense tries the same pandering stunt on Hillary, he done picked on the wrong person who understands that moral weakness of pandering best of all.
Obama was always against the war because he was a community organizer when the war was being talked about. If he were actually someone of influence he would have supported it like everyone else. He can't even come out in favor of gay marriage - You think he would have been able to go against 90% of the country to say he was against the war? Please..

Of course, he is so against it that he has not done a damn thing to change any of Bush's policies.. but keep living in your fantasy land that Obama is against the war.
When was the war talked about again?
 

JSt0rm

Lifer
Sep 5, 2000
27,399
3,948
126
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: sandorski
She would have made a good President.

She'd look like Reagan next to Obama.

I disagree. I think she would have been a better president than Obama. She just couldn't win the post and Obama could.

Right, because liberals would prefer woman stay in the kitchen..

barefoot and in the kitchen. If you are going to talk about what we like you better get it right.
 

JEDIYoda

Lifer
Jul 13, 2005
33,986
3,321
126
Originally posted by: BrownTown
It was a good response I think, but I hardly see any "pwnage" as the case may be.

hahahhaa....your so funny!!!

Her answer to pence was totall 100% ownage!!
Pence and thye smug way he tried to form the question he asked Hillary was totally self Pwnage!!
 

Thump553

Lifer
Jun 2, 2000
12,837
2,622
136
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Obama was always against the war because he was a community organizer when the war was being talked about. If he were actually someone of influence he would have supported it like everyone else. He can't even come out in favor of gay marriage - You think he would have been able to go against 90% of the country to say he was against the war? Please..

Of course, he is so against it that he has not done a damn thing to change any of Bush's policies.. but keep living in your fantasy land that Obama is against the war.


Do you just make up your facts out of thin air? President Obama was a community organizer after college befpre going to law school. After his three years of law school he then practiced law. Next he began his political career at the state level, first losing an election then winning one. His time as a community organizer was at least a decade BEFORE GWB enacted on his stupid fantasy to conquer Iraq in the name of freedom.

And if Obama hasn't changed any of Bush's policies as you claim, why are you, Fox News and the dittoheads so incensed at everything he does? You should be thrilled that he is purported continuing the policies of your great leader.

Geez, it's amazing sometimes the convoluted thought processes and factual fantansies the far right labors under.
 

Robor

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
16,979
0
76
Originally posted by: Thump553
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Obama was always against the war because he was a community organizer when the war was being talked about. If he were actually someone of influence he would have supported it like everyone else. He can't even come out in favor of gay marriage - You think he would have been able to go against 90% of the country to say he was against the war? Please..

Of course, he is so against it that he has not done a damn thing to change any of Bush's policies.. but keep living in your fantasy land that Obama is against the war.


Do you just make up your facts out of thin air? President Obama was a community organizer after college befpre going to law school. After his three years of law school he then practiced law. Next he began his political career at the state level, first losing an election then winning one. His time as a community organizer was at least a decade BEFORE GWB enacted on his stupid fantasy to conquer Iraq in the name of freedom.

And if Obama hasn't changed any of Bush's policies as you claim, why are you, Fox News and the dittoheads so incensed at everything he does? You should be thrilled that he is purported continuing the policies of your great leader.

Geez, it's amazing sometimes the convoluted thought processes and factual fantansies the far right labors under.

Don't feed the troll.
 

Gand1

Golden Member
Nov 17, 1999
1,026
0
76
Originally posted by: Thump553
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Obama was always against the war because he was a community organizer when the war was being talked about. If he were actually someone of influence he would have supported it like everyone else. He can't even come out in favor of gay marriage - You think he would have been able to go against 90% of the country to say he was against the war? Please..

Of course, he is so against it that he has not done a damn thing to change any of Bush's policies.. but keep living in your fantasy land that Obama is against the war.


Do you just make up your facts out of thin air? President Obama was a community organizer after college befpre going to law school. After his three years of law school he then practiced law. Next he began his political career at the state level, first losing an election then winning one. His time as a community organizer was at least a decade BEFORE GWB enacted on his stupid fantasy to conquer Iraq in the name of freedom.

And if Obama hasn't changed any of Bush's policies as you claim, why are you, Fox News and the dittoheads so incensed at everything he does? You should be thrilled that he is purported continuing the policies of your great leader.

Geez, it's amazing sometimes the convoluted thought processes and factual fantansies the far right labors under.

speaking of ownage....lolz
 

cyclohexane

Platinum Member
Feb 12, 2005
2,837
19
81
Originally posted by: Gand1
Originally posted by: Thump553
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil

Obama was always against the war because he was a community organizer when the war was being talked about. If he were actually someone of influence he would have supported it like everyone else. He can't even come out in favor of gay marriage - You think he would have been able to go against 90% of the country to say he was against the war? Please..

Of course, he is so against it that he has not done a damn thing to change any of Bush's policies.. but keep living in your fantasy land that Obama is against the war.


Do you just make up your facts out of thin air? President Obama was a community organizer after college befpre going to law school. After his three years of law school he then practiced law. Next he began his political career at the state level, first losing an election then winning one. His time as a community organizer was at least a decade BEFORE GWB enacted on his stupid fantasy to conquer Iraq in the name of freedom.

And if Obama hasn't changed any of Bush's policies as you claim, why are you, Fox News and the dittoheads so incensed at everything he does? You should be thrilled that he is purported continuing the policies of your great leader.

Geez, it's amazing sometimes the convoluted thought processes and factual fantansies the far right labors under.

speaking of ownage....lolz

owned indeed
 

Atreus21

Lifer
Aug 21, 2007
12,001
571
126
Ordinarily, I'd agree with Hillary. I don't agree, however, that drawing a parallel to Vietnam is accurate. Vietnam wasn't the ideological foe 10 years after the war that Venezuela is now, nor was Vietnam covorting with America's other foes, such as Russia and Cuba, nor engaging in trashing America and what it stands for, like Chavez does. If anything, in Doi Moi, they were engaging America's allies. Vietnam made very clear after 86 that it wanted to engage the international community, and move forward. Chavez doesn't seem as interested. He's interested in insulting the US and regressing into socialism.

FWIW, I hope Obama succeeds at removing Venezuela from our list of antagonists. But I'm a skeptic. My philosophy is that some nations, like people, hate us for the sake of hating us. There's no reason for it.
 

sandorski

No Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
70,749
6,319
126
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Ordinarily, I'd agree with Hillary. I don't agree, however, that drawing a parallel to Vietnam is accurate. Vietnam wasn't the ideological foe 10 years after the war that Venezuela is now, nor was Vietnam covorting with America's other foes, such as Russia and Cuba, nor engaging in trashing America and what it stands for, like Chavez does. If anything, in Doi Moi, they were engaging America's allies. Vietnam made very clear after 86 that it wanted to engage the international community, and move forward. Chavez doesn't seem as interested. He's interested in insulting the US and regressing into socialism.

FWIW, I hope Obama succeeds at removing Venezuela from our list of antagonists. But I'm a skeptic. My philosophy is that some nations, like people, hate us for the sake of hating us. There's no reason for it.

The Soviet Union was.
 

DaveSimmons

Elite Member
Aug 12, 2001
40,730
670
126
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: sandorski
She would have made a good President.

She'd look like Reagan next to Obama.
You think she'd be senile, drooling and sleeping through most of the day? I disagree.

I also don't think she'd be supporting drug smuggling to fund terrorism, but you never know.
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Ordinarily, I'd agree with Hillary. I don't agree, however, that drawing a parallel to Vietnam is accurate. Vietnam wasn't the ideological foe 10 years after the war that Venezuela is now, nor was Vietnam covorting with America's other foes, such as Russia and Cuba, nor engaging in trashing America and what it stands for, like Chavez does. If anything, in Doi Moi, they were engaging America's allies. Vietnam made very clear after 86 that it wanted to engage the international community, and move forward. Chavez doesn't seem as interested. He's interested in insulting the US and regressing into socialism.

FWIW, I hope Obama succeeds at removing Venezuela from our list of antagonists. But I'm a skeptic. My philosophy is that some nations, like people, hate us for the sake of hating us. There's no reason for it.

Your post is very confused, I'll hit a few places.

Socialism is not necessarily 'regression', and 'hating the US' do not go hand in hand with it. They're separate issues.

Your contrast of Venezuela and Viet Nam does not counter her clearly legitimate point about how one-time enemies of the US can later have relations with us.

And Viet Nam was a far bigger enemy of the US - our fault, by the way, they tried to approach us for an alliance - than Venezuela under Chavez.

Chavez has mainly criticized some of our policies - and often with good reason, and the Bush administration chose to make him an enemy.

When you say he's 'interested in insulting the US', you might recall that he has some reason not to be the friend of the administration that supported a coup against him.

Do you think just maybe *our* president might say a few mean words if he were hauled out of the White House at gunpoint and a corrupt regime replaced him for a few days?

So much for you blaiming Chavez.

And finally, Chavez has said he wants to build a new relationship now with Obama, and has changed his approach to a much friendlier one. But you prefer conflict, eh?
 

Craig234

Lifer
May 1, 2006
38,548
350
126
My opinion of the clip:

The Republicans usually show up with unloaded guns, firing blanks, nonsense rhetoric.

The image for me of this event: the Republican walks up to Hillary, and pulls his revolver, and smirks, looking like he has the upper hand. She walks to him calmly, takes the gun out of his hand, puts the barrel down his pants, and pulls the trigger. 'Click'. She hands the gun back to him and sits down.

*However* - in my opinion this is not an especially notable exchange. As much as I support Obama and Hillary's positions compared to his, it looks to me like he opened with the typical right-wing idiocy trying to make an issue out of nothing, even repeating his carefulll scripted talking points about the socialist disctator and his faux 'concern' about the president being used for propaganda - intentionally or not (interesting that he suggests Obama might be willingly volunteer for propaganda Can't trust them muslims.)

A weak, hot air attack. Hillary responded with calm cliches - nothing interesting. Loves her country since she was a little girl, serving her president, working for American interest...

In other words, she responded with a light, two finger slap, that knocked him to the ground only because the attack was pathetic. There's a hell of a lot better discussion going on.