Originally posted by: Lemon law
My reaction is that some of the Hillary would have made a good President crowd fail to understand why Obama won. Obama was always against the Iraq war,
Hillary tried to straddle the fence and pandered to GWB, and that is what gave Obama his opportunity, and that is the #1 reason why Obama won. You can't get it wrong on big things like wars and expect to win.
Hillary probably kicks herself for that political pandering everyday, but when Pense tries the same pandering stunt on Hillary, he done picked on the wrong person who understands that moral weakness of pandering best of all.
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: sandorski
She would have made a good President.
She'd look like Reagan next to Obama.
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: sandorski
She would have made a good President.
She'd look like Reagan next to Obama.
I disagree. I think she would have been a better president than Obama. She just couldn't win the post and Obama could.
Right, because liberals would prefer woman stay in the kitchen..
When was the war talked about again?Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Obama was always against the war because he was a community organizer when the war was being talked about. If he were actually someone of influence he would have supported it like everyone else. He can't even come out in favor of gay marriage - You think he would have been able to go against 90% of the country to say he was against the war? Please..Originally posted by: Lemon law
My reaction is that some of the Hillary would have made a good President crowd fail to understand why Obama won. Obama was always against the Iraq war,
Hillary tried to straddle the fence and pandered to GWB, and that is what gave Obama his opportunity, and that is the #1 reason why Obama won. You can't get it wrong on big things like wars and expect to win.
Hillary probably kicks herself for that political pandering everyday, but when Pense tries the same pandering stunt on Hillary, he done picked on the wrong person who understands that moral weakness of pandering best of all.
Of course, he is so against it that he has not done a damn thing to change any of Bush's policies.. but keep living in your fantasy land that Obama is against the war.
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: ironwing
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: sandorski
She would have made a good President.
She'd look like Reagan next to Obama.
I disagree. I think she would have been a better president than Obama. She just couldn't win the post and Obama could.
Right, because liberals would prefer woman stay in the kitchen..
Originally posted by: sandorski
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: sandorski
She would have made a good President.
She'd look like Reagan next to Obama.
Nah. Terri Schiavo might look like Carl Sagan next to you though.
Originally posted by: BrownTown
It was a good response I think, but I hardly see any "pwnage" as the case may be.
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Obama was always against the war because he was a community organizer when the war was being talked about. If he were actually someone of influence he would have supported it like everyone else. He can't even come out in favor of gay marriage - You think he would have been able to go against 90% of the country to say he was against the war? Please..
Of course, he is so against it that he has not done a damn thing to change any of Bush's policies.. but keep living in your fantasy land that Obama is against the war.
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: sandorski
She would have made a good President.
She'd look like Reagan next to Bonzo.
Originally posted by: Deeko
Originally posted by: lupi
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah
true story
Originally posted by: Thump553
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Obama was always against the war because he was a community organizer when the war was being talked about. If he were actually someone of influence he would have supported it like everyone else. He can't even come out in favor of gay marriage - You think he would have been able to go against 90% of the country to say he was against the war? Please..
Of course, he is so against it that he has not done a damn thing to change any of Bush's policies.. but keep living in your fantasy land that Obama is against the war.
Do you just make up your facts out of thin air? President Obama was a community organizer after college befpre going to law school. After his three years of law school he then practiced law. Next he began his political career at the state level, first losing an election then winning one. His time as a community organizer was at least a decade BEFORE GWB enacted on his stupid fantasy to conquer Iraq in the name of freedom.
And if Obama hasn't changed any of Bush's policies as you claim, why are you, Fox News and the dittoheads so incensed at everything he does? You should be thrilled that he is purported continuing the policies of your great leader.
Geez, it's amazing sometimes the convoluted thought processes and factual fantansies the far right labors under.
Originally posted by: Thump553
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Obama was always against the war because he was a community organizer when the war was being talked about. If he were actually someone of influence he would have supported it like everyone else. He can't even come out in favor of gay marriage - You think he would have been able to go against 90% of the country to say he was against the war? Please..
Of course, he is so against it that he has not done a damn thing to change any of Bush's policies.. but keep living in your fantasy land that Obama is against the war.
Do you just make up your facts out of thin air? President Obama was a community organizer after college befpre going to law school. After his three years of law school he then practiced law. Next he began his political career at the state level, first losing an election then winning one. His time as a community organizer was at least a decade BEFORE GWB enacted on his stupid fantasy to conquer Iraq in the name of freedom.
And if Obama hasn't changed any of Bush's policies as you claim, why are you, Fox News and the dittoheads so incensed at everything he does? You should be thrilled that he is purported continuing the policies of your great leader.
Geez, it's amazing sometimes the convoluted thought processes and factual fantansies the far right labors under.
Originally posted by: Gand1
Originally posted by: Thump553
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Obama was always against the war because he was a community organizer when the war was being talked about. If he were actually someone of influence he would have supported it like everyone else. He can't even come out in favor of gay marriage - You think he would have been able to go against 90% of the country to say he was against the war? Please..
Of course, he is so against it that he has not done a damn thing to change any of Bush's policies.. but keep living in your fantasy land that Obama is against the war.
Do you just make up your facts out of thin air? President Obama was a community organizer after college befpre going to law school. After his three years of law school he then practiced law. Next he began his political career at the state level, first losing an election then winning one. His time as a community organizer was at least a decade BEFORE GWB enacted on his stupid fantasy to conquer Iraq in the name of freedom.
And if Obama hasn't changed any of Bush's policies as you claim, why are you, Fox News and the dittoheads so incensed at everything he does? You should be thrilled that he is purported continuing the policies of your great leader.
Geez, it's amazing sometimes the convoluted thought processes and factual fantansies the far right labors under.
speaking of ownage....lolz
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Ordinarily, I'd agree with Hillary. I don't agree, however, that drawing a parallel to Vietnam is accurate. Vietnam wasn't the ideological foe 10 years after the war that Venezuela is now, nor was Vietnam covorting with America's other foes, such as Russia and Cuba, nor engaging in trashing America and what it stands for, like Chavez does. If anything, in Doi Moi, they were engaging America's allies. Vietnam made very clear after 86 that it wanted to engage the international community, and move forward. Chavez doesn't seem as interested. He's interested in insulting the US and regressing into socialism.
FWIW, I hope Obama succeeds at removing Venezuela from our list of antagonists. But I'm a skeptic. My philosophy is that some nations, like people, hate us for the sake of hating us. There's no reason for it.
You think she'd be senile, drooling and sleeping through most of the day? I disagree.Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: sandorski
She would have made a good President.
She'd look like Reagan next to Obama.
Originally posted by: Fear No Evil
Originally posted by: sandorski
She would have made a good President.
She'd look like Reagan next to Obama.
Originally posted by: Atreus21
Ordinarily, I'd agree with Hillary. I don't agree, however, that drawing a parallel to Vietnam is accurate. Vietnam wasn't the ideological foe 10 years after the war that Venezuela is now, nor was Vietnam covorting with America's other foes, such as Russia and Cuba, nor engaging in trashing America and what it stands for, like Chavez does. If anything, in Doi Moi, they were engaging America's allies. Vietnam made very clear after 86 that it wanted to engage the international community, and move forward. Chavez doesn't seem as interested. He's interested in insulting the US and regressing into socialism.
FWIW, I hope Obama succeeds at removing Venezuela from our list of antagonists. But I'm a skeptic. My philosophy is that some nations, like people, hate us for the sake of hating us. There's no reason for it.