• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Hillary Clinton = Defacto President Elect

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Marginal tax rates under Reagan were cut across the board...not just the rich. Tax rates under Obama are even lower than under Reagan. Income inequity under Obama is significantly worse than it was under Reagan. Yet Reagan is the demon here?

The rich received by far the greatest benefits from Reagan's tax cuts. Are you seriously trying to dispute this? Whether or not tax rates under Obama are lower than Reagan, that lower tax rate is not the result of Obama's preferred policies, unlike Reagan's. In fact, Obama has significantly raised taxes on the rich, which is smart economics.

How hard is it to simply hold people responsible for the policies they support and promote?

"It is undeniable that the sharp reduction in taxes in the early 1980s was a
strong impetus to economic growth." - President Clinton's Council of Economic Advisers (1994)

Spin it as you will...but overall Reagan did a good job with the disaster he inherited from Carter.

If anyone is trying to spin here it's you. I'm simply quoting the economics research on his policies. You're the one trying to mine quotes from two decades ago and declare that he inherited a 'disaster' from Carter which was actually a monetary policy induced recession.

Don't spin it, just look at the data objectively. Reaganomics was Keynesian stimulus that had a fairly significant waste to it in tax cuts for the rich.
 
They aren't undocumented immigrants. They are breaking us immigration laws, thus, they are illegal immigrants.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...amned-lies-and-obamas-deportation-statistics/


Whatever the wordplay might be, the bottom line seems to stand: Obama enforced immigration laws more zealously than any other president. I know this from 2nd hand sources who are immigration lawyers. What they tell me is that the prior adminstration (W. administration, that is) did nothing. They did not process legal immigrations, nor did they did deport illegals. The just sat their biding time while collecting government paychecks. Everything changed under Obama administration so that now legal immigration processing is on track while illegals are also on track to deportation.

In other words, the government has worked under Obama. Not under the W. administration.
 
Reagan’s tax increases

1982: The most significant tax increase Reagan signed was also the first. The Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 (yes, another law with a very sexy name) increased taxes by almost 1 percent of GDP.

The 1982 tax increase was "probably the largest peacetime tax increase in American history," said economist Bruce Bartlett, who advised Reagan on domestic policy and then worked as Treasury deputy assistant secretary for economic policy in the George H.W. Bush administration. (An analysis by Jerry Tempalski, an analyst in the Office of Tax Analysis with the U.S. Department of the Treasury, agrees.)

This law was driven by pressure to attack the federal budget deficit, as well as the impression that Reagan’s tax-cutting was partially responsible for lower-than-expected tax revenues.

Bartlett, who reviewed Reagan’s tax record for Tax Notes in 2011, cited a Treasury estimate that the 1982 law raised taxes by almost 1 percent of GDP, or about $150 billion in modern dollars.

Specifically, it rolled back some but not all of the 1981 tax cut for writing off equipment, and it repealed 1981 "safe harbor" leasing provisions, said Stephen J. Entin, senior fellow at the Tax Foundation and former deputy assistant secretary for economic policy in the Reagan administration.

1983: A law Reagan signed in 1983 aimed to keep Social Security afloat by increasing payroll taxes and taxing Social Security benefits for some high-earners. This cost $24.6 billion, or almost $50 billion in 2015 dollars, through 1988, according to an administration estimate.

1984: The Deficit Reduction Act that Reagan signed rolled back part of the 1981 cut on buildings, Entin said, with the idea that Congress would enact spending cuts. "But many of those cuts were either never enacted or were later restored," Entin said. This led to $25 billion in tax receipts.

Reagan also signed tax increases in 1985, 1986, 1987 and 1988 (as well as a couple other laws with revenue reductions).

http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...n-colbert-brings-ronald-reagans-tax-raising-/
 
It is fitting the final two are Cruz and The Duck. The Duck being the nominee, most likely. And his entourage is just.. impressive.


Eric "philanthropist" Trump
Eric-Trump.jpg

the-ermahgerd-meme-girl-has-finally-been-found-here-s-what-she-looks-like-now-668756.jpg


Separated at birth?
 
Eric "philanthropist" Trump
Eric-Trump.jpg



I'll just say this...It's a good thing for Eric Trump that he has money. 😱
 
Last edited:
The rich received by far the greatest benefits from Reagan's tax cuts. Are you seriously trying to dispute this? Whether or not tax rates under Obama are lower than Reagan, that lower tax rate is not the result of Obama's preferred policies, unlike Reagan's. In fact, Obama has significantly raised taxes on the rich, which is smart economics.

"Raised" the taxes on the rich? More like he let the "Temporary" Bush Tax Cuts expire for the 1% without making them permanent.
 
"Raised" the taxes on the rich? More like he let the "Temporary" Bush Tax Cuts expire for the 1% without making them permanent.

Please. That was because Repubs held extended UI benefits hostage to those cuts during the worst economic fiasco in 80 years, induced by their Ownership Society fraud.

They've been the Party of top down economic warfare since Reagan.
 
Back
Top