Marginal tax rates under Reagan were cut across the board...not just the rich. Tax rates under Obama are even lower than under Reagan. Income inequity under Obama is significantly worse than it was under Reagan. Yet Reagan is the demon here?
The rich received by far the greatest benefits from Reagan's tax cuts. Are you seriously trying to dispute this? Whether or not tax rates under Obama are lower than Reagan, that lower tax rate is not the result of Obama's preferred policies, unlike Reagan's. In fact, Obama has significantly raised taxes on the rich, which is smart economics.
How hard is it to simply hold people responsible for the policies they support and promote?
"It is undeniable that the sharp reduction in taxes in the early 1980s was a
strong impetus to economic growth." - President Clinton's Council of Economic Advisers (1994)
Spin it as you will...but overall Reagan did a good job with the disaster he inherited from Carter.
If anyone is trying to spin here it's you. I'm simply quoting the economics research on his policies. You're the one trying to mine quotes from two decades ago and declare that he inherited a 'disaster' from Carter which was actually a monetary policy induced recession.
Don't spin it, just look at the data objectively. Reaganomics was Keynesian stimulus that had a fairly significant waste to it in tax cuts for the rich.