Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Genx87
Got my Toshiba A2 for 100 bucks. So yeah it is worth it. However I wouldnt drop 200+ on HiDef just for the sake of having it. yes, the picture is crystal clear. But not worth 200+ for the player imo.
This is surprising because even a decent DVD player runs 200 bucks. To get a HD one for the same price seems like a no brainer. This is the same argument that says buy the cheapest CD player there is.
It just isn't true. 200 bucks to get HD playback is the bargain of the century IMHO. The color alone is worth it, not to mention the resolution.
I hate to be an elitist arse, but if somebody doesn't view HD movies and drop their jaw over a regular DVD then something is wrong. Something is very wrong.
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Genx87
Got my Toshiba A2 for 100 bucks. So yeah it is worth it. However I wouldnt drop 200+ on HiDef just for the sake of having it. yes, the picture is crystal clear. But not worth 200+ for the player imo.
This is surprising because even a decent DVD player runs 200 bucks. To get a HD one for the same price seems like a no brainer. This is the same argument that says buy the cheapest CD player there is.
It just isn't true. 200 bucks to get HD playback is the bargain of the century IMHO. The color alone is worth it, not to mention the resolution.
I hate to be an elitist arse, but if somebody doesn't view HD movies and drop their jaw over a regular DVD then something is wrong. Something is very wrong.
Well you have to realize I barely watch TV and watch even less movies. So to me 200+ for a DVD player is ludicrous. 200+ for HD isnt worth it. For 200+ I can put the money into something computer related or into a retirement account.
Originally posted by: spidey07
It is absolutely worth it. If nothing more than the color alone.
Originally posted by: Rio Rebel
Originally posted by: spidey07
It is absolutely worth it. If nothing more than the color alone.
A lot of people will miss this point. It is a very important one. HD-DVD and Blu-Ray is not just an improvement of video resolution, it is also an improvement of color and of audio.
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: Rio Rebel
Originally posted by: spidey07
It is absolutely worth it. If nothing more than the color alone.
A lot of people will miss this point. It is a very important one. HD-DVD and Blu-Ray is not just an improvement of video resolution, it is also an improvement of color and of audio.
Yeh, moreso than anything else it was the color the popped at me. Especially in the very colorful fields and scenery in Last of the Samuri.
I need to re-rent Curse of the Golden Flower in Blu-Ray and see if my eyes explode with the insane colors that are in the movie.
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: Rio Rebel
Originally posted by: spidey07
It is absolutely worth it. If nothing more than the color alone.
A lot of people will miss this point. It is a very important one. HD-DVD and Blu-Ray is not just an improvement of video resolution, it is also an improvement of color and of audio.
Yeh, moreso than anything else it was the color the popped at me. Especially in the very colorful fields and scenery in Last of the Samuri.
I need to re-rent Curse of the Golden Flower in Blu-Ray and see if my eyes explode with the insane colors that are in the movie.
*cough*
The 5th element
*cough*
It may not be worth it to replace the whole library, but it most definitely is worth it to replace many of your favourite ones.Originally posted by: sdifox
Bottom line is still the movie in question. I don't care how high the resolution is and how well transferred to BRD or HD-DVD is, if the movie suck, high resolution is not going to make it any better. If you already have a big dvd collection and have a decent upscaler, then I am not sure it is worth it to replace the library.
Originally posted by: Eug
It may not be worth it to replace the whole library, but it most definitely is worth it to replace many of your favourite ones.Originally posted by: sdifox
Bottom line is still the movie in question. I don't care how high the resolution is and how well transferred to BRD or HD-DVD is, if the movie suck, high resolution is not going to make it any better. If you already have a big dvd collection and have a decent upscaler, then I am not sure it is worth it to replace the library.
Of course it depends on your setup, but on a big screen from relatively close, even the best upscaling doesn't even come close to real HD. Not even in the same league, not just because of resolution, but for other factors as well, including better colour, less artifacts, better sound, and better extras.
I considered the Optoma HD72, but it didn't fit my mounting preferences (and I was worried about possible rainbows). So, I got a Panasonic PT-AX200U instead, shooting 90".Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: Eug
It may not be worth it to replace the whole library, but it most definitely is worth it to replace many of your favourite ones.Originally posted by: sdifox
Bottom line is still the movie in question. I don't care how high the resolution is and how well transferred to BRD or HD-DVD is, if the movie suck, high resolution is not going to make it any better. If you already have a big dvd collection and have a decent upscaler, then I am not sure it is worth it to replace the library.
Of course it depends on your setup, but on a big screen from relatively close, even the best upscaling doesn't even come close to real HD. Not even in the same league, not just because of resolution, but for other factors as well, including better colour, less artifacts, better sound, and better extras.
Well, I am currently on a HD72 shooting 92" so no 1080p to 480p comparison. I can tell the diff, just not sure I am willing to buy all 1200 of them again in hd... especially if it is a newer movies, where they tend to be digital source, then the difference is not as pronounced. I do record HD off my OTA tuner though (cough cough)
Actually Blazing Saddles is supposted to be fairly good on HD DVD. That's not really surprising though, since it's from a film source, which was cleaned up relatively recently.Originally posted by: Rio Rebel
I'm not willing to replace the library, either. "The Pursuit of Happyness" or "Blazing Saddles" isn't going to lend itself to the advantages of high def. But "The Last Samurai" or "Troy" is going to be so much better.
And we still haven't seen the potential tapped for audio. Get "Legends of Jazz with Ramsey Lewis" and you will be floored with the lossless audio.
Originally posted by: Rio Rebel
Originally posted by: Genx87
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Genx87
Got my Toshiba A2 for 100 bucks. So yeah it is worth it. However I wouldnt drop 200+ on HiDef just for the sake of having it. yes, the picture is crystal clear. But not worth 200+ for the player imo.
This is surprising because even a decent DVD player runs 200 bucks. To get a HD one for the same price seems like a no brainer. This is the same argument that says buy the cheapest CD player there is.
It just isn't true. 200 bucks to get HD playback is the bargain of the century IMHO. The color alone is worth it, not to mention the resolution.
I hate to be an elitist arse, but if somebody doesn't view HD movies and drop their jaw over a regular DVD then something is wrong. Something is very wrong.
Well you have to realize I barely watch TV and watch even less movies. So to me 200+ for a DVD player is ludicrous. 200+ for HD isnt worth it. For 200+ I can put the money into something computer related or into a retirement account.
That's fine, and certainly a legitimate position, but it doesn't really add anything to the thread, does it? You aren't giving any input on the value of HD, you're just giving input on how much you value video in general.
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: Rio Rebel
Originally posted by: spidey07
It is absolutely worth it. If nothing more than the color alone.
A lot of people will miss this point. It is a very important one. HD-DVD and Blu-Ray is not just an improvement of video resolution, it is also an improvement of color and of audio.
Yeh, moreso than anything else it was the color the popped at me. Especially in the very colorful fields and scenery in Last of the Samuri.
I need to re-rent Curse of the Golden Flower in Blu-Ray and see if my eyes explode with the insane colors that are in the movie.
Originally posted by: sdifox
Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: vi_edit
Originally posted by: Rio Rebel
Originally posted by: spidey07
It is absolutely worth it. If nothing more than the color alone.
A lot of people will miss this point. It is a very important one. HD-DVD and Blu-Ray is not just an improvement of video resolution, it is also an improvement of color and of audio.
Yeh, moreso than anything else it was the color the popped at me. Especially in the very colorful fields and scenery in Last of the Samuri.
I need to re-rent Curse of the Golden Flower in Blu-Ray and see if my eyes explode with the insane colors that are in the movie.
*cough*
The 5th element
*cough*
Do you know if they only have the fixed up version? That would be a concern 🙂
Yes, although that was the director's intent for Ocean's 13.Originally posted by: Chaotic42
I just watched Oceans 13 on HD-DVD tonight. Its image quality was less than stellar.