Lithium381
Lifer
- May 12, 2001
- 12,458
- 2
- 0
<liberal> they should have just called the police and told the intruders to wait 12 minutes</liberal>
OP assumes that you need to kill every single intruder, which is not even close to true.
We're talking about self defense here, not mass murder. Scaring off or disabling the intruders is preferable to killing them all.
Does it make sense that civilians who've never actually faced imminent danger should be carrying the same weapons as law enforcement, who face real, deadly threats?
Law abiding citizens trying to defend themselves. Bad guys rarely break in alone and under stress most of your shots aren't going to be effectively on target. Video does a great job of pounding that home with a very likely scenario. Do the math.
4 bad guys, you'll need 3-4 quality shots center mass to stop each of them. That means you need 12-16 shots, on target and good hits. You're going to miss at least 50% of your shots, and that's being generous you're likely to miss more than that.
That means 32 rounds is the minimum you should have ready to fire. Makes the AR-15 a perfect defense weapon. 7 rounds isn't enough, 10 rounds isn't enough, 20 isn't enough for home defense. It's a game of numbers, and magazine bans tilt the benefit to criminals who rarely break in alone.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7F1nPSNnaBo&feature=youtu.be