Hidden cam shows my wife running a red light

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

AlienCraft

Lifer
Nov 23, 2002
10,539
0
0
Originally posted by: rpkelly
These responses amuse me. It is her right to go to Court. How is it irresponsible to practice those rights?

The irresponsibility began when she cruised through an intersection with clearly placed traffic cams.

mmmm kay?
 

Onita

Golden Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,158
0
71
Originally posted by: paulxcook
Originally posted by: rpkelly
Originally posted by: paulxcook
Originally posted by: rpkelly
These responses amuse me. It is her right to go to Court. How is it irresponsible to practice those rights?

So your contention is that practicing any of our rights at any time is always a responsible thing to do?

I'd like to know why practicing your rights isn't responsible? Do you think you're going to get taxed less if she doesn't go to Court or something?

I didn't make a statement, I asked a question.

Amazing, and I did first!
 

Onita

Golden Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,158
0
71
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: rpkelly
These responses amuse me. It is her right to go to Court. How is it irresponsible to practice those rights?

The irresponsibility began when she cruised through an intersection with clearly placed traffic cams.

mmmm kay?

I never said running a red light is responsible. I still don't see how it is irresponsible to practice your rights.
 

ahurtt

Diamond Member
Feb 1, 2001
4,283
0
0
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
If she didn't stop completely, then turn right, and it's clearly on video she doesn't have a chance.

Tell her to pay the ticket, stop fighting the inevitable, and come to a full stop next time before making a right at a red light. Probably not what she wants to hear but sometimes people don't want to hear the truth.

That goes double when you are talking about women. Unless there are points on your license involved it is soooooo not worth it to go to court over this. If going to court means she can avoid a point or 2, then maybe it's worth it. But chances are what will happen, if the judge gives her anything at all in terms of lenience, it'll be like he'll reduce the fine by $10 and then she'll have to pay $25 in court fees. If no points are involved and you are clearly in the wrong, as it seems your wife is in this case, going to court is certainly still her right. . .it's her time and your money to waste as she sees fit I suppose. I have a feeling she will end up slightly worse off by going to court for this than if she had just admitted her mistake, paid the fine, and moved on with life.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,594
990
126
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: rpkelly
These responses amuse me. It is her right to go to Court. How is it irresponsible to practice those rights?

The irresponsibility began when she cruised through an intersection with clearly placed traffic cams.

mmmm kay?

She didn't "cruise through" an intersection. What she did was make a right turn at a red light (which is perfectly legal in this state) without coming to a complete stop.
 

paulxcook

Diamond Member
May 1, 2005
4,277
1
0
Originally posted by: rpkelly
Originally posted by: paulxcook
Originally posted by: rpkelly
Originally posted by: paulxcook
Originally posted by: rpkelly
These responses amuse me. It is her right to go to Court. How is it irresponsible to practice those rights?

So your contention is that practicing any of our rights at any time is always a responsible thing to do?

I'd like to know why practicing your rights isn't responsible? Do you think you're going to get taxed less if she doesn't go to Court or something?

I didn't make a statement, I asked a question.

Amazing, and I did first!

I assume you just aren't going to answer.
 

Savij

Diamond Member
Nov 12, 2001
4,233
0
71
I've been to traffic court for 7 different moving violations and never been displeased with any of the results. I've only fought the charges once (was being tailgated and didn't see the light start to change). The other times I've had the charges dropped, fine dropped or been given traffic school for now points on the record. It may not be worth it to fight the ticket, but it's definitely $$$$ worth it to ask for reduced fines.
 

AlienCraft

Lifer
Nov 23, 2002
10,539
0
0
Originally posted by: rpkelly
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: rpkelly
These responses amuse me. It is her right to go to Court. How is it irresponsible to practice those rights?

The irresponsibility began when she cruised through an intersection with clearly placed traffic cams.

mmmm kay?

I never said running a red light is responsible. I still don't see how it is irresponsible to practice your rights.

When you're guilty as hell, you're gaming the system by trying to avoid your consequences.
How is that a responsible use of those rights?
These rights were codified to avoid transgressions by the Government upon the citizens.
I fail to see how a red light ticket is any of that.
 

Onita

Golden Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,158
0
71
Originally posted by: paulxcook
Originally posted by: rpkelly
Originally posted by: paulxcook
Originally posted by: rpkelly
Originally posted by: paulxcook
Originally posted by: rpkelly
These responses amuse me. It is her right to go to Court. How is it irresponsible to practice those rights?

So your contention is that practicing any of our rights at any time is always a responsible thing to do?

I'd like to know why practicing your rights isn't responsible? Do you think you're going to get taxed less if she doesn't go to Court or something?

I didn't make a statement, I asked a question.

Amazing, and I did first!

I assume you just aren't going to answer.

And I'll assume the same.
 

Onita

Golden Member
Feb 24, 2004
1,158
0
71
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: rpkelly
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Originally posted by: rpkelly
These responses amuse me. It is her right to go to Court. How is it irresponsible to practice those rights?

The irresponsibility began when she cruised through an intersection with clearly placed traffic cams.

mmmm kay?

I never said running a red light is responsible. I still don't see how it is irresponsible to practice your rights.

When you're guilty as hell, you're gaming the system by trying to avoid your consequences.
How is that a responsible use of those rights?
These rights were codified to avoid transgressions by the Government upon the citizens.
I fail to see how a red light ticket is any of that.

It isn't always about avoiding the consequences. I know in my area, going to Court will save you money on the fine, often times quite a bit. I'd personally feel like an idiot not going to Court and throwing away my money.
 

Andy22

Golden Member
Jun 8, 2001
1,425
0
71
Cut the crap and show us some hidden video of your wife in the red light district.
 

TehMac

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2006
9,976
3
71
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
FWIW-She was turning right on red, which is legal in this state, and they say she didn't stop.



That is incredibly petty. Not stopping to turn right on red? Can you believe how many people do that? I personally stop all the way because it's a good idea and I'm not a woman driver, but seriously, that is pretty petty. Where was it approximately? Around Encinitas?
 

moshquerade

No Lifer
Nov 1, 2001
61,504
12
56
I don't know if it's been mentioned, but those same hidden traffic cams have caught people red handed having affairs.
 

Pacfanweb

Lifer
Jan 2, 2000
13,158
59
91
So...you never told us: Since she's seen the video, does she at least admit to you now that she didn't stop?
 

Farley2k

Senior member
Jan 5, 2003
248
0
71
Originally posted by: bapace
In Florida, Red Light Cameras are only able to issue warning tickets due to the fact that it is your constitutional right to face your accuser in court. If your accuser is a camera, you can't really face them. Red Light Cameras are still banned in Florida from issuing real tickets.

That is so stupid.

If I rob an ATM it is just the camera accusing me as well! Why don't I just get a warning?

Also by the stupid logic of Florida if I kill someone I should never be able to be found guilty of murder (assuming no one sees) because I can't face my accuser in court! After all they are dead so my defense can never get to cross examine them!

 

PingSpike

Lifer
Feb 25, 2004
21,765
615
126
Originally posted by: Sluggo
Honestly, are you going to believe your wife or your lying eyes?




BTW, for you unmarried guys the correct answer is believe your wife.

Its far easier for us to let her waste her time then to get into a fight for not supporting her. :p
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
Originally posted by: Farley2k
Originally posted by: bapace
In Florida, Red Light Cameras are only able to issue warning tickets due to the fact that it is your constitutional right to face your accuser in court. If your accuser is a camera, you can't really face them. Red Light Cameras are still banned in Florida from issuing real tickets.

That is so stupid.

If I rob an ATM it is just the camera accusing me as well! Why don't I just get a warning?

Also by the stupid logic of Florida if I kill someone I should never be able to be found guilty of murder (assuming no one sees) because I can't face my accuser in court! After all they are dead so my defense can never get to cross examine them!

with the murder there is other evidance then teh word of the victim. such as DNA and yes you can argue with teh tech/scientist who does it.


 

yuppiejr

Golden Member
Jul 31, 2002
1,317
0
0

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
i just went to traffic court on wed for a accident i was in. before court started the judge told us that if you were there for a red light camera ticket you are wasting your time.
1. its a zero point ticket so you cant plea bargin with the city attorney
2. only the judge can impose the fine and she said she always gives out the max fine for red light runners
3. you can plea not guilty and go to trial, of which you will loose because there is a picture of you running the red light.

so if i was your wife i would just mail in the fine.

 

MegaVovaN

Diamond Member
May 20, 2005
4,131
0
0
Originally posted by: Citrix
i just went to traffic court on wed for a accident i was in. before court started the judge told us that if you were there for a red light camera ticket you are wasting your time.
1. its a zero point ticket so you cant plea bargin with the city attorney
2. only the judge can impose the fine and she said she always gives out the max fine for red light runners
3. you can plea not guilty and go to trial, of which you will loose because there is a picture of you running the red light.

so if i was your wife i would just mail in the fine.

:thumbsup:
all that fairy BS about your rights and whatnot is annoying

I hate lame drivers that run the lights and don't stop on right red light turn. They cause T-bone and other accidents.
 

TruePaige

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2006
9,874
2
0
Originally posted by: Farley2k
Originally posted by: bapace
In Florida, Red Light Cameras are only able to issue warning tickets due to the fact that it is your constitutional right to face your accuser in court. If your accuser is a camera, you can't really face them. Red Light Cameras are still banned in Florida from issuing real tickets.

That is so stupid.

If I rob an ATM it is just the camera accusing me as well! Why don't I just get a warning?

Also by the stupid logic of Florida if I kill someone I should never be able to be found guilty of murder (assuming no one sees) because I can't face my accuser in court! After all they are dead so my defense can never get to cross examine them!

Actually in a murder case the accuser could be "The People" and you get to face the representative of the people, usually the ADA / DA / what have you.

Hugely different circumstances...