Here's a real Ron Paul POLL.

[miketheidiot]

Originally posted by: 40Hands
Yes. Him vs. Obama

 

[NoStateofMind]

Originally posted by: Corbett
This poll makes no sense.

Of course the dems want Ron Paul to win the Republican nomination. Then any democratic candidate will win against him!

How about starting a new poll where only republicans vote?

Even if you took out the democrat voters, everyone else still shit stomps the no vote. So the poll *is* valid.

 

[NoStateofMind]

Originally posted by: miketheidiot

Originally posted by: 40Hands
Yes. Him vs. Obama

That would be a very good presidential race (pun not intended).

 

[NoStateofMind]

Originally posted by: Capitalizt

Originally posted by: Evan Lieb

You spend an oddly frequent amout of time obsessing about a candidate you deem so insignificant.

He is terrified. These neocon wackos know that the pro war pro big gubmint vote is going to be split between Giuliani, Mccain, Thompson, Romney, etc.. Ron Paul is offering a very clear alternative to these candidates which gives him a HUGE voting bloc all his own. All conservatives who are opposed to the Iraq war and the endless growth of government only have one man who represents their viewpoint, Dr. Ron Paul. And this gives him a very very good chance of winning this thing.

Your reasons here are exactly why they want him off MSM. They know as well as us, if he gets the airplay and people find out about Ron Paul, there will be a landslide of votes his way. Yes, they are scared shitless!

 

[GeezerMan]

yes, and my dog says yes too.

 

[JD50]

Originally posted by: blackllotus
I would take RP over any of the other republican candidates and would vote for him if he didn't have such radical economic views (fed, cia, fbi, etc.)

Thats pretty much my reason for not voting for him.

 

[JD50]

Whats up with people saying things like "yes for Republican but no for President"? That doesn't make any sense in a poll trying to find out who would vote for Ron Paul for President.

 

[JD50]

Originally posted by: BoberFett

Originally posted by: Harvey
No.

So you're against the only Republican who would withdrawn from Iraq? Considering Hillary and Obama sound like they have no intention of leaving Iraq either, I have to keep wondering if all your

:frown:

crap is just a bunch of bullshit. If you really cared about leaving Iraq, Paul would be your best bet because I have a hard time seeing Kucinich beating Hillary or Obama.

Good point, and that goes for the whole anti war crowd.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: JD50

Originally posted by: BoberFett

Originally posted by: Harvey
No.

So you're against the only Republican who would withdrawn from Iraq? Considering Hillary and Obama sound like they have no intention of leaving Iraq either, I have to keep wondering if all your

:frown:

crap is just a bunch of bullshit. If you really cared about leaving Iraq, Paul would be your best bet because I have a hard time seeing Kucinich beating Hillary or Obama.

Good point, and that goes for the whole anti war crowd.

:thumbsup:

But it is sad to watch so many who rightfully bash the war in Iraq end up voting for Hillary who will keep the troops there at least until the end of her first term.

Party > Principles = :thumbsdown:

 

[NoStateofMind]

Originally posted by: bamacre

Originally posted by: JD50

Originally posted by: BoberFett

Originally posted by: Harvey
No.

So you're against the only Republican who would withdrawn from Iraq? Considering Hillary and Obama sound like they have no intention of leaving Iraq either, I have to keep wondering if all your

:frown:

crap is just a bunch of bullshit. If you really cared about leaving Iraq, Paul would be your best bet because I have a hard time seeing Kucinich beating Hillary or Obama.

Good point, and that goes for the whole anti war crowd.

:thumbsup:

But it is sad to watch so many who rightfully bash the war in Iraq end up voting for Hillary who will keep the troops there at least until the end of her first term.

Party > Principles = :thumbsdown:

Good words :thumbsup:

 

[magomago]

Yes for Ron Paul

 

[Aimster]

YES

I'd vote for him over any democratic candidate.

 

[zephyrprime]

yes. he's the only republican candidate that isn't a sleezeball.

 

[imported_hscorpio]

YES.

 

[bamacre]

Originally posted by: GrGr
But I do not agree with Paul on many issues like his anti abortion stance.

Paul believes it should be decided by the states.

 

[JEDIYoda]

Ron Who?

lol.....

 

[NoStateofMind]

Originally posted by: JEDIYoda
Ron Who?

lol.....

Is that a yes or no?

 

[juiio]

Yes

 

[JD50]

LOL, what happened to Techs?

 

[eits]

yes

 

[eits]

Originally posted by: manowar821
Yes for republican, no for the president. (I'd rather have Obama)

agreed

 

[SoundTheSurrender]

I'm voting for Ron Paul. If he doesn't make ti through I'm not voting for anyone.

 

[ultra laser]

YES

 

[Capitalizt]

Originally posted by: SoundTheSurrender
I'm voting for Ron Paul. If he doesn't make ti through I'm not voting for anyone.

If he doesn't make it, you should really consider the Libertarian Party They mirror his views almost exactly.

 

[JEDIYoda]

This again no true poll because the OP never asked for reasons why....
thus the poll already has gone south!