• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Here’s how you school climate deniers: The anti-science movement’s biggest fallacies,

Page 21 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Take it up with the New York Times. They used unanimous.
I'm reporting their news as people seem apt to deny it.

You did however try to conflate a panel of scientists, which could be anyone, with the opinion of scientists in general, which is not cool.

As we already covered, scientists in general strongly supported warming, not cooling.
 
Evidently the .12C upward to buoy data was to homogenize that data set with engine intake temperature monitors. That assumes buoy data, designed for environmental monitoring/data collection, is less accurate than a ships engine intake thermometer (EIT). Highly suspect I would think.

Denier 😉
 
Back
Top