Again, it is about the evidence in each particular case. Everyone already knows science adjusts to the best evidence we have at the time. Using the errors of the past to demean current research is a dishonest method to cast doubt because that system is already built into science, it is intrinsic. It is the foundation of science. It keeps people skeptical of new data, which is a good thing. However, it shouldn't be used to throw everything out or belittle many scientist's conclusions.
Of course it doesn't mean at any point in time we are absolutely correct, but you must show evidence as to why we aren't correct not broadly equate the past to the current debate. :thumbsup: