Originally posted by: newnameman
Go for the Samsung LN46B550 http://accessories.us.dell.com...dhs&cs=19&sku=A2514539
Originally posted by: boomhower
That is fine looking TV. I am really starting to waver on the size and am considering as smaller 40-42 set. It is nice to see Samsung doing well. I had always been a Sony guy when it came to TV's. Are they much worse? Anything more indepth why they are better. Heck I am still trying to figure out the difference between Sony's S and V series.
Originally posted by: boomhower
Thanks, I appreciate the advise and was ready to buy, then they updated the sale. They have the Sony KDL-46S4100 for $999. Is the Samsung worth $280 more?
Originally posted by: sivart
If you know very little about the LCD's then why does it have to be an LCD? Why not plasma, rear-projection, etc. Also, why must it be 1080p....are you just listening to what the manufacturers want you know? 1080p may be a waste of money depending on your viewing conditions.
Study some of these links first.
http://www.google.com/search?q...rlz=1B3GGGL_en___US232
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Originally posted by: sivart
If you know very little about the LCD's then why does it have to be an LCD? Why not plasma, rear-projection, etc. Also, why must it be 1080p....are you just listening to what the manufacturers want you know? 1080p may be a waste of money depending on your viewing conditions.
Study some of these links first.
http://www.google.com/search?q...rlz=1B3GGGL_en___US232
Missed this...but I have to say. WHY NOT 1080P?
Seriously, 720p is ok but the price difference is almost zero for the screen sizes being looked at. No reason not to 1080p at this point. None at all.
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Originally posted by: sivart
If you know very little about the LCD's then why does it have to be an LCD? Why not plasma, rear-projection, etc. Also, why must it be 1080p....are you just listening to what the manufacturers want you know? 1080p may be a waste of money depending on your viewing conditions.
Study some of these links first.
http://www.google.com/search?q...rlz=1B3GGGL_en___US232
Missed this...but I have to say. WHY NOT 1080P?
Seriously, 720p is ok but the price difference is almost zero for the screen sizes being looked at. No reason not to 1080p at this point. None at all.
Originally posted by: Noubourne
Originally posted by: cmdrdredd
Originally posted by: sivart
If you know very little about the LCD's then why does it have to be an LCD? Why not plasma, rear-projection, etc. Also, why must it be 1080p....are you just listening to what the manufacturers want you know? 1080p may be a waste of money depending on your viewing conditions.
Study some of these links first.
http://www.google.com/search?q...rlz=1B3GGGL_en___US232
Missed this...but I have to say. WHY NOT 1080P?
Seriously, 720p is ok but the price difference is almost zero for the screen sizes being looked at. No reason not to 1080p at this point. None at all.
Because if you're sitting back 12' from a 46" TV - you can't even see all the detail in 720 - so paying even one dollar more is throwing your money away. You might as well burn it. Human visual acuity has its limits.
Originally posted by: boomhower
I went with the Sony KDL-46S4100 and added a PS3 for $300 more, sick price. $1300 for a 46" blue ray set-up is a pretty screamin' deal in my book.