help get this cat murderer in jail for life!

[SuperTool]

5 years sounds like an overkill. I think this whole animal rights BS is getting out of hand. The people calling for life in jail are morons. Instead of signing that petiotion, they could as well be signing a petition that says "I am a retard who lets emotions get ahead of common sense"

 

[Viper GTS]

Originally posted by: RedSquirrel

Originally posted by: lirion

Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
The way I look at it is that a cat is alive just like we are, and feels pain just like we do.

I also forgot to put torture, as it's different than if he would of just shot it (which I still think would deseve such penalty).

But one thing, I never realized this was higher than human torture/murder like mentioned (rape etc).

I say they should upp that as well. At least have them both equal. But any type of torture/murder should be life in jail.

I do like the light him on fire part. They could poor boiling oil on him, then light it on fire, once it's all burt, toss him in liquid nitrogen and repeat process 10 times. (he should die before that though). But before, he should do at least 25 years in jail, then the torture.

Are you a vegan?

Not but I believe I probably could be if I really wanted to. Killing for food is different than killing for "fun". Killing for food is simply part of nature and the food chain. Though I heard pretty nasty things about slaughterhouses and stuff, but it's still killing for food. Animals kill other animals for food, we are technically animals, and we are on top of the food chain, so we kill for food too.

But you won't see a lion killing a deer just to make it suffer, but rather to eat it.

You ever watched a cat play with a mouse/mole/shrew/etc?

Not that it makes it right for people to torture animals (I'm 100% against it), but you're simply wrong if you believe other species don't kill for reasons other than eating. My parents' cats (all outside cats) routinely kill small rodents & leave the bodies all over the place. They don't eat them, & they have all the catfood they could want right on the porch.

Viper GTS

 

[kami333]

Haven't they wasted enough tax money on this whole matter already?

 

[Red Squirrel]

Originally posted by: Viper GTS

Originally posted by: RedSquirrel

Originally posted by: lirion

Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
The way I look at it is that a cat is alive just like we are, and feels pain just like we do.

I also forgot to put torture, as it's different than if he would of just shot it (which I still think would deseve such penalty).

But one thing, I never realized this was higher than human torture/murder like mentioned (rape etc).

I say they should upp that as well. At least have them both equal. But any type of torture/murder should be life in jail.

I do like the light him on fire part. They could poor boiling oil on him, then light it on fire, once it's all burt, toss him in liquid nitrogen and repeat process 10 times. (he should die before that though). But before, he should do at least 25 years in jail, then the torture.

Are you a vegan?

Not but I believe I probably could be if I really wanted to. Killing for food is different than killing for "fun". Killing for food is simply part of nature and the food chain. Though I heard pretty nasty things about slaughterhouses and stuff, but it's still killing for food. Animals kill other animals for food, we are technically animals, and we are on top of the food chain, so we kill for food too.

But you won't see a lion killing a deer just to make it suffer, but rather to eat it.

You ever watched a cat play with a mouse/mole/shrew/etc?

Not that it makes it right for people to torture animals (I'm 100% against it), but you're simply wrong if you believe other species don't kill for reasons other than eating. My parents' cats (all outside cats) routinely kill small rodents & leave the bodies all over the place. They don't eat them, & they have all the catfood they could want right on the porch.

Viper GTS

That is true, but it's more rarely seen as humans doing it, and only humans do it "regularly". I'm sure many of these retards don't get caught. What we hear of might be less than 50% of killers.

and some of these animal killers and up killing humans too.

 

[Wallydraigle]

Originally posted by: RedSquirrel

Originally posted by: lirion

Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
The way I look at it is that a cat is alive just like we are, and feels pain just like we do.

I also forgot to put torture, as it's different than if he would of just shot it (which I still think would deseve such penalty).

But one thing, I never realized this was higher than human torture/murder like mentioned (rape etc).

I say they should upp that as well. At least have them both equal. But any type of torture/murder should be life in jail.

I do like the light him on fire part. They could poor boiling oil on him, then light it on fire, once it's all burt, toss him in liquid nitrogen and repeat process 10 times. (he should die before that though). But before, he should do at least 25 years in jail, then the torture.

Are you a vegan?

Not but I believe I probably could be if I really wanted to. Killing for food is different than killing for "fun". Killing for food is simply part of nature and the food chain. Though I heard pretty nasty things about slaughterhouses and stuff, but it's still killing for food. Animals kill other animals for food, we are technically animals, and we are on top of the food chain, so we kill for food too.

But you won't see a lion killing a deer just to make it suffer, but rather to eat it.

I doubt the cow that will be tommorrow's hamburger sees the difference.

At the risk of sounding like a lawyer, let me say that the man was grilling the cat. Are we not just jumping to concliusions in assuming that he wouldn't have eaten it if he wasn't interrupted by his busy-body neighbor?

Are you just grandstanding, or would you seriously take a man's life away because he killed a cat? Would you feel any different if he had eaten the cat when it was done cooking?

 

[Viper GTS]

Originally posted by: RedSquirrel

Originally posted by: Viper GTS

Originally posted by: RedSquirrel

Originally posted by: lirion

Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
The way I look at it is that a cat is alive just like we are, and feels pain just like we do.

I also forgot to put torture, as it's different than if he would of just shot it (which I still think would deseve such penalty).

But one thing, I never realized this was higher than human torture/murder like mentioned (rape etc).

I say they should upp that as well. At least have them both equal. But any type of torture/murder should be life in jail.

I do like the light him on fire part. They could poor boiling oil on him, then light it on fire, once it's all burt, toss him in liquid nitrogen and repeat process 10 times. (he should die before that though). But before, he should do at least 25 years in jail, then the torture.

Are you a vegan?

Not but I believe I probably could be if I really wanted to. Killing for food is different than killing for "fun". Killing for food is simply part of nature and the food chain. Though I heard pretty nasty things about slaughterhouses and stuff, but it's still killing for food. Animals kill other animals for food, we are technically animals, and we are on top of the food chain, so we kill for food too.

But you won't see a lion killing a deer just to make it suffer, but rather to eat it.

You ever watched a cat play with a mouse/mole/shrew/etc?

Not that it makes it right for people to torture animals (I'm 100% against it), but you're simply wrong if you believe other species don't kill for reasons other than eating. My parents' cats (all outside cats) routinely kill small rodents & leave the bodies all over the place. They don't eat them, & they have all the catfood they could want right on the porch.

Viper GTS

That is true, but it's more rarely seen as humans doing it, and only humans do it "regularly". I'm sure many of these retards don't get caught. What we hear of might be less than 50% of killers.

and some of these animal killers and up killing humans too.

Rarely seen in cats? I would daresay that 99% of cats (under 10 years old, to eliminate the blind/deaf/arthritic cats) if given the chance would play with a live animal. The fact that the majority of cats will never eat anything more fresh than boneless, skinless chicken breasts from a plastic package has no bearing on their instinct.

Viper GTS

 

[Red Squirrel]

Originally posted by: kami333
Haven't they wasted enough tax money on this whole matter already?

I don't see why they need to use tax money for this but I guess they do. I heard executions cost a lot, I don't know why. They should just strangle to death, or let them die of hunger in a cell. (oil and fire sounds fun but it would cost more) I'm sure there are ways to get rid of these people without having it to cost so much money.

 

[Brutuskend]

Done and done!

 

[olds]

Don't cats kill squirrels?

 

[Dudd]

Why is a cat more important than any other animal out there? When I was younger, like 4 or 5, I'd get bored and go outside and stamp on the ants running around my driveway. Why? Because they were ants, and I was bored. Should I have been locked up and put in therapy for life? While a grown man killing a cat is vastly different, I say 5 years is plenty of time in the joint.

 

[Red Squirrel]

Originally posted by: Viper GTS

Originally posted by: RedSquirrel

Originally posted by: Viper GTS

Originally posted by: RedSquirrel

Originally posted by: lirion

Originally posted by: RedSquirrel
The way I look at it is that a cat is alive just like we are, and feels pain just like we do.

I also forgot to put torture, as it's different than if he would of just shot it (which I still think would deseve such penalty).

But one thing, I never realized this was higher than human torture/murder like mentioned (rape etc).

I say they should upp that as well. At least have them both equal. But any type of torture/murder should be life in jail.

I do like the light him on fire part. They could poor boiling oil on him, then light it on fire, once it's all burt, toss him in liquid nitrogen and repeat process 10 times. (he should die before that though). But before, he should do at least 25 years in jail, then the torture.

Are you a vegan?

Not but I believe I probably could be if I really wanted to. Killing for food is different than killing for "fun". Killing for food is simply part of nature and the food chain. Though I heard pretty nasty things about slaughterhouses and stuff, but it's still killing for food. Animals kill other animals for food, we are technically animals, and we are on top of the food chain, so we kill for food too.

But you won't see a lion killing a deer just to make it suffer, but rather to eat it.

You ever watched a cat play with a mouse/mole/shrew/etc?

Not that it makes it right for people to torture animals (I'm 100% against it), but you're simply wrong if you believe other species don't kill for reasons other than eating. My parents' cats (all outside cats) routinely kill small rodents & leave the bodies all over the place. They don't eat them, & they have all the catfood they could want right on the porch.

Viper GTS

That is true, but it's more rarely seen as humans doing it, and only humans do it "regularly". I'm sure many of these retards don't get caught. What we hear of might be less than 50% of killers.

and some of these animal killers and up killing humans too.

Rarely seen in cats? I would daresay that 99% of cats (under 10 years old, to eliminate the blind/deaf/arthritic cats) if given the chance would play with a live animal. The fact that the majority of cats will never eat anything more fresh than boneless, skinless chicken breasts from a plastic package has no bearing on their instinct.

Viper GTS

I meant rarely seen in animals in general. Cats do play around with their food a lot, and they probably are the worse for that, but humans should be smart enough not to be a copy cat. (haha, copy cat)

 

[Howard]

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: Kaervak

Originally posted by: lirion
Five years and $5000 sounds about right. What's the problem?

If he had just up and killed the cat, fine. But he put it in a grill and let it burn while laughing. There's a difference between killing something and torturing it.

right. but it is STILL only a CAT.

5 years and a $5k fine sounds good.

Don't most serial murderers start off abusing smaller animals?

 

[SuperTool]

Next thing they'll prosecute people taking antibiotics for cruelty to bacteria.

 

[Red Squirrel]

" Don't cats kill squirrels? "

Yeah they do, but they still don't deserve to be tortured.

I have a cat, she claws my feet at night. I feel bad just kicking her off the bed. Can't believe people do these horrible torture things.

 

[SuperTool]

Originally posted by: Howard

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: Kaervak

Originally posted by: lirion
Five years and $5000 sounds about right. What's the problem?

If he had just up and killed the cat, fine. But he put it in a grill and let it burn while laughing. There's a difference between killing something and torturing it.

right. but it is STILL only a CAT.

5 years and a $5k fine sounds good.

Don't most serial murderers start off abusing smaller animals?

So? Did this guy kill a human? A lot of people who aren't serial murderers "abuse" animals.

 

[Xionide]

Originally posted by: ScottyB

Originally posted by: lirion

Originally posted by: Kaervak

Originally posted by: lirion
Five years and $5000 sounds about right. What's the problem?

If he had just up and killed the cat, fine. But he put it in a grill and let it burn while laughing. There's a difference between killing something and torturing it.

So what should we do with him?

90 days in jail and $500 fine.

I agree

-Xionide

 

[Pepsi90919]

check out response #9,088

 

[Red Squirrel]

Originally posted by: SuperTool

Originally posted by: Howard

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: Kaervak

Originally posted by: lirion
Five years and $5000 sounds about right. What's the problem?

If he had just up and killed the cat, fine. But he put it in a grill and let it burn while laughing. There's a difference between killing something and torturing it.

right. but it is STILL only a CAT.

5 years and a $5k fine sounds good.

Don't most serial murderers start off abusing smaller animals?

So? Did this guy kill a human? A lot of people who aren't serial murderers "abuse" animals.

He probably will once he comes out of jail. I bet his first target will be the person who called the cops on him. Someone wacked enough to do such a thing to a cat is wacked enough to murder humans as well.

 

[Brutuskend]

The guy tortured a small defenseless animal. IMO he's just getting warmed up. Nip it in the bud I say, and set a precedent so others will think long and hard before they do something similar!

 

[OutHouse]

life for killing a damn cat? damn dude you are a nutcase. rapist and child molesters get less time than that, think about it...

 

[Brutuskend]

Originally posted by: Citrix
life for killing a damn cat? damn dude you are a nutcase. rapist and child molesters get less time than that, think about it...

They should get life (or death) as well IMO!

 

[olds]

Originally posted by: Citrix
life for killing a damn cat? damn dude you are a nutcase. rapist and child molesters get less time than that, think about it...

That's a little harsh. He's just squirrely.

 

[SuperTool]

Originally posted by: RedSquirrel

Originally posted by: SuperTool

Originally posted by: Howard

Originally posted by: waggy

Originally posted by: Kaervak

Originally posted by: lirion
Five years and $5000 sounds about right. What's the problem?

If he had just up and killed the cat, fine. But he put it in a grill and let it burn while laughing. There's a difference between killing something and torturing it.

right. but it is STILL only a CAT.

5 years and a $5k fine sounds good.

Don't most serial murderers start off abusing smaller animals?

So? Did this guy kill a human? A lot of people who aren't serial murderers "abuse" animals.

He probably will once he comes out of jail. I bet his first target will be the person who called the cops on him. Someone wacked enough to do such a thing to a cat is wacked enough to murder humans as well.

You don't know that. But even if true, we don't put people in prison for being "wacked enough to murder humans," if they haven't done it yet.

 

[Syringer]

Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
check out response #9,088

OMG THAT LINK IS THE ABSOLUTE NASTIEST THING I'VE EVER SEEN. I URGE YOU NOT TO CLICK IT ALTHOUGH ME WARNING YOU THIS WILL JUST FURTHER INCLINE YOU TO BUT PLEASE DON'T.

 

[brunswickite]

Originally posted by: Dudd
Why is a cat more important than any other animal out there? When I was younger, like 4 or 5, I'd get bored and go outside and stamp on the ants running around my driveway. Why? Because they were ants, and I was bored. Should I have been locked up and put in therapy for life? While a grown man killing a cat is vastly different, I say 5 years is plenty of time in the joint.

very well said,

of course what he did was wrong, but it does not justify a 5 years in prison, I would say a few days at best...

Considering he was cooking it, you could assume he was going to eat the cat....

how is that any different from eating beef, chicken or any other meat....?



Note: I am not saying i would eat a cat or a domestic animal, but how does eating one differ from eating a cow, pig or lamb?