• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Hello Shoe..

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
dawp said:
they should block viagra and such from insurance and start charging $200 a pill
Click to expand...

Damn pills are already $65.00 a pill and some politicians still buy 30 at a time. For what??? No sane chick wants to fuck Bitch McConnell.
 
cytg111 said:
I dont understand why these betas wants the year of the dog to come around .. cause come time, he aint sitting at the table. Case in point Trump .. that fucker only exists cause we are a civil society.. He wants to undermine the very civil structure that enables him to begin with, is like sawing off the branch you are sitting on. Push come to shove, can anyone imagine cadet bone spurs sliding a blade into another human being and taking a life? Wannabe gangsters to the left of me, wannabe Putins to the right, stuck in the middle with the rest of humanity.
Fuck it.
She fine.
Click to expand...

Trump doesn't have the stomach to walk up to someone and stick a knife in their neck and stare them in the eyes as they die, he'd drop the knife and run away screaming like a little girl.
 
sdifox said:
Pharmacists get visits from sales rep from drug companies and they distribute samples in hopes of increasing sales.

Everyone knows this.
Click to expand...
I haven't heard of this with pharmacists because I wasn't aware pharmacists can prescribe? I only ever got samples directly from my doc
 
Perknose said:
Unless you consider male masturbation murder, aborting a fetus before it could viably live on its own is damn well NOT murder. You know what IS murder though? Executing doctors who perform abortion. THAT'S murder.
Click to expand...

Sperm are not children. A Fetus is a child. Drawing such a comparison to half of the undeveloped genetic material is emotional, if not retarded, rubbish.

You used the term "live on its own". Should that be the guideline for murder? No human child can live on their own for several years after birth. So tell me, what makes birth so special as to be your ultimate delineation? Premature babies can survive up to 4 months early. A two year old is cheaper but no more independent, especially if they have medical needs.

There is no fine line, no clean delineation. Not if we are to compromise between NEVER and ALWAYS. This has to result in a grey area and for legal reasons we must choose what that is. We are taking a hot topic, with something undefined, and giving it a definition to suit our purposes for a compromise. Setting it at birth would not be a compromise. Neither would conception. So I offer a clear path forward, ALL the abortions you want - so long as they are done quickly and early in the pregnancy. First trimester being ideal, second being opposed, third being off limits. More reasonable people than us would need to negotiate over the second trimester.

That is a healthy and constructive approach to abortion. Which I am sure fanatics on both sides would oppose. Where would you truly stand, I wonder?
 
Jaskalas said:
Sperm are not children. A Fetus is a child. Drawing such a comparison to half of the undeveloped genetic material is emotional, if not retarded, rubbish.

You used the term "live on its own". Should that be the guideline for murder? No human child can live on their own for several years after birth. So tell me, what makes birth so special as to be your ultimate delineation? Premature babies can survive up to 4 months early. A two year old is cheaper but no more independent, especially if they have medical needs.

There is no fine line, no clean delineation. Not if we are to compromise between NEVER and ALWAYS. This has to result in a grey area and for legal reasons we must choose what that is. We are taking a hot topic, with something undefined, and giving it a definition to suit our purposes for a compromise. Setting it at birth would not be a compromise. Neither would conception. So I offer a clear path forward, ALL the abortions you want - so long as they are done quickly and early in the pregnancy. First trimester being ideal, second being opposed, third being off limits. More reasonable people than us would need to negotiate over the second trimester.

That is a healthy and constructive approach to abortion. Which I am sure fanatics on both sides would oppose. Where would you truly stand, I wonder?
Click to expand...
Why do you care if other people are aborting their fetuses?
 
Jaskalas said:
Sperm are not children. A Fetus is a child.
Click to expand...
A fetus is not a child.

Drawing such a comparison to half of the undeveloped genetic material is emotional, if not retarded, rubbish.
Click to expand...
You make this statement as if you are completely unaware of reductio ab absurdum, "is a form of argument that attempts either to disprove a statement by showing it inevitably leads to a ridiculous, absurd, or impractical conclusion."

In this case, it is used to show the "ridiculous, absurd and impractical conclusion" that people spout, as you did just above, that "A fetus is a child."

Such a statement, typed as you did without any qualification whatsoever, includes all fetuses from the moment of conception. It is sloppy and primitive thinking.

A fetus before viability is NOT a child. Nor is sperm or an egg,, which was my damn point!

You used the term "live on its own". Should that be the guideline for murder? No human child can live on their own for several years after birth. So tell me, what makes birth so special as to be your ultimate delineation?
Click to expand...

What I fucking well said is, "aborting a fetus before it could viably live on its own is damn well NOT murder." Your primitive emotions around this subject lead you to intentionally miscast this statement as mine as saying that birth is my ultimate delineation, when it clearly is not what I said at all!

Can you see that? Can you admit that?

There is no fine line, no clean delineation.
Click to expand...

My point. THAT was MY FUCKING POINT!

So I offer a clear path forward, ALL the abortions you want - so long as they are done quickly and early in the pregnancy. First trimester being ideal, second being opposed, third being off limits. More reasonable people than us would need to negotiate over the second trimester.
Click to expand...

Agreed.


Where would you truly stand, I wonder?
Click to expand...

Wonder no more.
 
Jaskalas said:
It is murder, but ending your own civilization to put a stop to it is, well... killing millions to save millions is a no win scenario.
Practical policy is a compromise to ensure abortions are done as early as possible. The most humane approach.
Click to expand...

So would you support any woman convicted of getting an abortion being sent to a facility (breeding farm) where she was forced to give birth to (X) number of babies to make up for the one she aborted?
 
Last edited:
Viper1j said:
Damn pills are already $65.00 a pill and some politicians still buy 30 at a time. For what??? No sane chick wants to fuck Bitch McConnell.
Click to expand...

Holy shit. I had no idea they costed that much.

I think there's a generic version overseas called Kamagra.. last I heard 50 pack costed $50.
 
Victorian Gray said:
Just looked it up: Apparently it's $37 for a pack of 4 tablets here in Canada. I imagine that the generic form would be cheaper.
Click to expand...

Here in Murica we love Capitalism and insist on lining the pockets of big Pharma, don't come round here with your commie prescription prices.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top