Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Originally posted by: Whoozyerdaddy
I can't think of a single person on this board (left/right R/D) who has supported paperless balloting. I've rolled my eyes at the conspiracy theories but I've always said that a paperless system is asking for trouble.
It sucks that I'm at work. I have to change the TVs over to the Louiville/WV game when customers come in. I'm missing it.
With it being possible to hack the memory cards and the executable software, would it not be possible to simply have the printout show whatever he voter just selected, while incorrectly incrementing the total vote count?
Someone in an older countered the idea of a paper trail with this kind of argument, that if we can't be sure that the electronic system itself is secure, a paper trail won't do much good. Doing a recount would require that everyone turn their papers back in.
I was referring to paper ballots where the voter manually marks their selection. The idea of getting a reciept is kind of silly for the reasons you just cited. And the idea of running a tape is equally problematic if the machine malfunctioned or was hacked. (To be honest I'm more worried about the machine crashing and losing its vote tally than I am about hackers - but it's possible)
Scanning paper ballots is the best solution. If there are any irregulrities or if a recount is needed you still have the original ballots available for manual verification.
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Bump. On again this morning on HBO: 9:00 a.m. EST, 6:00 a.m. Pacific. On again on HBO West, noon Eastern, 9:00 a.m. Pacific.
Originally posted by: Jeff7
Maybe we should go back to something mechanical, with easily readable and verifiable output counts. Something like a glorified version of this.
That way you can look at the count to see that it has correctly increased.
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
Bump. On again this morning on HBO: 9:00 a.m. EST, 6:00 a.m. Pacific. On again on HBO West, noon Eastern, 9:00 a.m. Pacific.
Dammitall, missed it again. (Who gets up at 9am on Sundays?)
Anyone have an estimate on how big the file is from Google Video? I'm at a univeristy campus, and our weekly bandwidth allotment is only 2GB. I know it won't take up all of that, but it could still eat up a substantial block. I am curious as to just how substantial it will be.
Originally posted by: Tab
Holy crap, I can see why Diebold doesn't want this on the air. There's no reason why anyone should ever be allowed to purchase something from Diebold for an election.
This thread should be a sticky.
Yes, between that and the Ars Technica article, it seems like Diebold hits new lows in in IT systems (in)security. It can barely be explained away as abject incompetence. It's almost as if they designed the systems to be compromised. All they're missing (as someone else commented) is a big yellow "Hack Me" button on the back.Originally posted by: Tab
Holy crap, I can see why Diebold doesn't want this on the air. There's no reason why anyone should ever be allowed to purchase something from Diebold for an election. ...
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
This is on several times tomorrow (Tuesday) for those who haven't seen it. Also available on-line (see links above). Eye-opening, especially for the average person who hasn't seen the various articles and exposes in the technical press. Perhaps this will raise awareness enough to get the MSM to start investigating.
True enough. We already have a good start on investigating the issue. I'm sure there's much more waiting to be revealed.Originally posted by: Jeff7
Originally posted by: Bowfinger
This is on several times tomorrow (Tuesday) for those who haven't seen it. Also available on-line (see links above). Eye-opening, especially for the average person who hasn't seen the various articles and exposes in the technical press. Perhaps this will raise awareness enough to get the MSM to start investigating.
Start investigating? Sounds like the investigating has been done already. What it needs is exposure in the mainstream media.