Originally posted by: Atif
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
and don't even compare it to the us army. you CAN leave the us army, and you CAN speak out against it as many have once you have left. you can think ill thoughts write books and whatever you feel like, its called freedom of speech. don't confuse freedom of thought with freedom to kill which would be treason and is a much different thing.
LOL, why are you so offended? I asked you a random question and you inferred it to mean that I was "comparing" something to the punishment for treason in the U.S. Army.
As you cool down, I'm sure that even you'll admit that in the Army, the punishment for treason for a top-rank General is different than that of a new recruit fresh out of training, correct? Why is this so?
It is because an established veteran of the Army is understood to have a complete understanding of the cause he is representing. He is to be in completely agreement
ideologically to the institution of the Army and his role within it. If this veteran commits treason in its highest form - abandoning the U.S. Army and joining the Army of North Korea - he will be severely punished when/if recovered.
On the opposite end of the spectrum, if a soldier, having just completed training, grows tired of the time commitment necessary to serve in the Army walks away from service, his punishment will be different. It may be that this individual only joined for the financial benefit offered by the Army, or because it was the "cool" thing to do.
You are obviously an educated individual, and for this reason alone, I am appalled by your ignorance with respect to the right to
reserve capital punishment for acts of treason even in secular law (
treason, as defined by the U.S. Constitution,
treason is punishable by death in the U.S. even today).
In closing, I point out once more that the apostate, or one who commits treason against the rule of God is NOT killed. IF there were an Islamic State, (one that implements the social, penal, familial system of God) and there was a case of treason against the rule of the state (and by extension, God's rule), the individual would still NOT be killed necessarily. It would be the duty of the government to investigate the
specific case, and, make a fair judgement. IF the act of treason against the state was heinous enough, the government would have the ability to hand down capital punishment, just as is the case in many Western and Eastern European governments today.
Peace