Have any ANANDers been slapped with RIAA subpoenas yet?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

kaizersose

Golden Member
May 15, 2003
1,196
0
76
I know that downloading music is illegal but i believe that the RIAA and the production companies brought it on themselves. I have a 128 disc folder full of $15.00+ cd's with one or two songs on it that i like. The fact is that people were ripped off so badly for so long that when the opportunity came along for free music, they jumped at the opportunity with little guilt. I honestly believe that if someone had come out with something like iTunes when all of this was starting 4 years ago, much of the piracy would have been avoided. if i could have purchased a quality version of any song i like for $0.99 i dont know if i would have hassled with finding one on napster. the fact is that the RIAA and its clients were so fat and happy at the time that they completely ignored the digitalization of music, only waking up in time to see the stampede dust pass them by. They are now trying their best to hold it back but there is too much out there.
 

Paulson

Elite Member
Feb 27, 2001
10,689
0
0
www.ifixidevices.com
Like it's been said before and i will say it again... until they offer us a reasonable solution for downloading music we will like.. the will continue to shoot themselves in the foot.

They could be making millions and millions more per year if they just let us download songs we want to for a fee. No nonsense... no bull, just music we want to pay for.

I think they also can offer EVERY SINGLE SONG & version ever made. It couldn't be that hard. In fact, if they offered me a million dollars in hardware, I could easily set up a system for them to do so :p
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
Heh, the majority of users will never go onto any music download source. Why? Because you have to pay! Why would anyone pay when you can download Kazaa...WinMx. Emule.....
 

LordRaiden

Banned
Dec 10, 2002
2,358
0
0
Originally posted by: SunnyD
Well, according to the article I read, they're targeting:

  1. Verizon (725+ subpoenas)
  1. Colleges (<30 subpoena)
  1. Everyone else (<10 subpoenas)
Yeah, they're hitting Verizon so hard because Verizon fought them so hard. So this is their idea of payback. Their thoughts are "Oh, so you want to prevent us from being greedy turds? Fine, we'll be gready turds and make your life misserable."

Personally, I hope Verizon takes forever to get the info to them, or mysteriously looses the customer data. :D

 

cavemanmoron

Lifer
Mar 13, 2001
13,683
58
91
hear about this,
i recently formated my hard drive
nothing saved on it any longer

also i reinstalled ZoneAlarm
 

ViRGE

Elite Member, Moderator Emeritus
Oct 9, 1999
31,516
167
106
Originally posted by: yukichigai
Originally posted by: Hubris
Originally posted by: yukichigai
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: ness1469
Uhh, you do understand that by sharing the files you are giving anyone who uses KaZaa permission to access your files, right?

Uhhhh...you do understand that's the whole foundation of the way KaZaa works, right?

That's why I like FTP servers and fservs. Because of the announcement text you can have listed when people connect you can shield yourself from having your file list used for subpoenas, indictments and any other manner of legal actions.

Yeah, I'm sure that would hold up in court.
rolleye.gif

Under the DMCA it does. All you have to have are logs showing that when they were informed of the policy and told that doing anything but exiting immediately implied consent of these rules that they did something that indicated they agreed. The wording of the warning does have to be specific though.
It'll still never hold. You can't use the DMCA to cover up illegal activities; the AIMster case more or less proved that.
 

txxxx

Golden Member
Feb 13, 2003
1,700
0
0
Its REALLY ironic , them saying its effecting RECORD SALES! I work in a warehouse, were a good share is Music CD's, and we've just been informed that the warehouse incresed its sales by 20% !!!!!! So much so they're expanding.

No names mentioned.

Mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.... go figgure

And no, this isnt bull...suprised me too!
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
It looks like what the RIAA does to Kazaa users is go through their shared folder to see how much copyrighted material a user has. I don't think they'd waste their time on someone who has 10 songs downloaded. Well the new KazaaLite has an option that will not let you look through a users shared folder. VERY sweet! All we need now is an IP spoofing "feature" and all will be complete. Let the RIAA try to get the logs of an ISP in Switzerland, only to find out it is a rogue IP. :) Fvck the RIAA! Fvck them hard!!!

RIAA, let me let you in on a little secret...The reason your records sales are down isn't because of P2P, it's because ALL OF THE MUSIC OUT NOW SUCKS!!! I download VERY few songs. And the ones I download, I usually buy the CD. I'm REALLY picky about what I put in my music library, and the only music that goes in there are MP3 that are ripped from CDs I OWN. I have 350+ CDs (that I bought and paid for) in my music libray, but I haven't bought CDs lately, because there is nothing out there that I like. Sh!t, I haven't used Kazaa Lite to download music in...forever.

And here is another suggestion for the RIAA...Let's start paying these ex-crack dealers (50 cent) less so you can drop the price of the CDs, so more people will buy them. $16 for a CD is BS!
 

element

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
4,635
0
0
Originally posted by: JackBurton
It looks like what the RIAA does to Kazaa users is go through their shared folder to see how much copyrighted material a user has. I don't think they'd waste their time on someone who has 10 songs downloaded. Well the new KazaaLite has an option that will not let you look through a users shared folder. VERY sweet! All we need now is an IP spoofing "feature" and all will be complete. Let the RIAA try to get the logs of an ISP in Switzerland, only to find out it is a rogue IP. :) Fvck the RIAA! Fvck them hard!!!

RIAA, let me let you in on a little secret...The reason your records sales are down isn't because of P2P, it's because ALL OF THE MUSIC OUT NOW SUCKS!!! I download VERY few songs. And the ones I download, I usually buy the CD. I'm REALLY picky about what I put in my music library, and the only music that goes in there are MP3 that are ripped from CDs I OWN. I have 350+ CDs (that I bought and paid for) in my music libray, but I haven't bought CDs lately, because there is nothing out there that I like. Sh!t, I haven't used Kazaa Lite to download music in...forever.

And here is another suggestion for the RIAA...Let's start paying these ex-crack dealers (50 cent) less so you can drop the price of the CDs, so more people will buy them. $16 for a CD is BS!

LMAO ....^^^^^Someone has a clue!^^^^^ Can I get an amen? how about a whoa Bundy!

but but...the ex crack dealers and no talent insane ass clown musicians out there are so kewl! a 13 year old girl said so on a talk show. and they are like so kewl! like m&ms, I like the green ones. insane is in man, haven't you heard? the whole world has gone looney. or maybe they always were.
 

Aves

Lifer
Feb 7, 2001
12,233
31
101
Originally posted by: JackBurton
And here is another suggestion for the RIAA...Let's start paying these ex-crack dealers (50 cent) less so you can drop the price of the CDs, so more people will buy them. $16 for a CD is BS!

Wait! You think the artist's cut of the CD profits is the reason that they're $16?

lol
 

Ness

Diamond Member
Jul 10, 2002
5,407
2
0
I think its funny how many people are looking to somehow justify the fact that they are stealing by saying things like the RIAA is so greedy or so much music sucks. If the music sucks, why are you downloading it to begin with? The RIAA has the right to be greedy if they want. It still doesn't change the fact that you are stealing from them. While I do agree that the artists aren't getting a cut, it doesn't change the fact that people are stealing from the RIAA. They have every right to try and take back what is theirs, and I think it's so pathetic that so many people are willing to risk being sued over it.

The biggest thing that cracks me up though, is when people try to say they do it because CDs cost too much. People, CDs have been the same price for the past 8 or 9 years, if you aren't used to the price by now then it probably means you have piss poor financial skills and you spend too much money on pure CRAP. You don't need to buy every CD in the world just because they have one song you like.

The fact is that people were ripped off so badly for so long that when the opportunity came along for free music, they jumped at the opportunity with little guilt

For the record, that is not a fact, that is merely your opinion.
 

JackBurton

Lifer
Jul 18, 2000
15,993
14
81
If the music sucks, why are you downloading it to begin with?
I'm not downloading JACK! The point is, the RIAA is blaming poor record sales on P2P, when in all actuality it is because there isn't anything out there worth buying (OR downloading)!

 

PatboyX

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2001
7,024
0
0
Originally posted by: jagr10
So instead of the music companies coming up with a big ass site with all their music available for download for a reasonable fee, they waste that money going after regular joe's. I mean, if they charged a yearly or monthly fee that was decent, people might actually download quality music from them.

i was signed up to emusic.com for a while (when tmbg released new "exlclusive" stuff every month) it was like 10 bucks a month all the downloads you want. a lot of good stuff...even excellent spoken word.
let me get a listen for a lot of bands i might not haveotherwise.
 

halik

Lifer
Oct 10, 2000
25,696
1
81
heres my philosophy,
they dont lose money on ey downloading music, since i wonuldn't go buy the cd if i didnt have access to the mp3s anyway. Its like cassettes all over...oh no they can make copies...then cdburners...

you cant stop the technology, thats all
 

Tab

Lifer
Sep 15, 2002
12,145
0
76
So what if the record companies arent releasing anything good. So what if they are blaming record sales on P2P, I know I am. It is still stealing! You idiots think you can hide by putting a little note, you dont have permission to download from me blah blah blah. I bet 100% of all the anandtech users who 'warez' dont have the resources to put up with any legal battle from the RIAA a multi billion dollar recording company. Are the RIAA Assholes by ruining college kids lives? Who was the person who started a campus wide Direct Connect Network which could easly have over 100k over stolen software and music? Which would most likely be copywritten forbidding you of redistrubiting without a proper permit. Of course the RIAA could have just slapped them on the wrist, a $5k fine instead of narly 175k one. The DMCA eliminates all of your protection of hiding your secert stash of mp3s. Its what its meant to do. I do actively download, but am I afraid? Yes, but I am still a minor and I've only got less than 12Gbs of warez. Do you see me ranting like a idiot on how the RIAA is evil? Nope, its stealing! I do it because I know I can get away with it 99.9% of the time! I really enjoy the suggestions on how the RIAA should offer a download system. Why in the hell would anyone pay for anything when they can download their music for free? Not many people respect any of the artists, if they did they would be buying their albums.
 

PCboy

Senior member
Jul 9, 2001
847
0
0
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Just use Kazaa Lite 2.4.0 that has built in RIAA protection. Not that hard folks.

Originally from: Overclockers.com

But Kazaa Lite has an IP Blocker Now! They Say It's Safe!

Do you know what an IP blocker is? It's just a list of IP addresses. The same principle is used for an ad-blocker.

Ad-blockers work principally because it isn't practical for them to change their IP addresses all the time. The RIAA snoops are under no such restraints. They can easily change IP addresses.

So if the RIAA changes addresses, you are completely unprotected until somebody figures out that a particular IP address is now a "bad" one. Since the only sure way to find that out is to see how many people get sued after a particular IP address gets lively, this is hardly great protection.

It's like thinking your house is rat-free after covering up a single mouse hole. Unless you have pretty stupid rats, you're only kidding yourself.

Nor is any "privacy" feature likely to put much of a crimp in searching. RIAA only needs one file to sue you.

 

PCboy

Senior member
Jul 9, 2001
847
0
0
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: falias
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Just use Kazaa Lite 2.4.0 that has built in RIAA protection. Not that hard folks.

How about you just lay off Kazaa and use eMule...


What's eMule?

emule = www.emule-project.net, if you don't know something, google it.
Personally I prefer the other edits/mods of emule like emule+ and fusion/LSD.
 

yukichigai

Diamond Member
Apr 23, 2003
6,404
0
76
Originally posted by: Tabb
So what if the record companies arent releasing anything good. So what if they are blaming record sales on P2P, I know I am. It is still stealing! You idiots think you can hide by putting a little note, you dont have permission to download from me blah blah blah. I bet 100% of all the anandtech users who 'warez' dont have the resources to put up with any legal battle from the RIAA a multi billion dollar recording company. Are the RIAA Assholes by ruining college kids lives? Who was the person who started a campus wide Direct Connect Network which could easly have over 100k over stolen software and music? Which would most likely be copywritten forbidding you of redistrubiting without a proper permit. Of course the RIAA could have just slapped them on the wrist, a $5k fine instead of narly 175k one. The DMCA eliminates all of your protection of hiding your secert stash of mp3s. Its what its meant to do. I do actively download, but am I afraid? Yes, but I am still a minor and I've only got less than 12Gbs of warez. Do you see me ranting like a idiot on how the RIAA is evil? Nope, its stealing! I do it because I know I can get away with it 99.9% of the time! I really enjoy the suggestions on how the RIAA should offer a download system. Why in the hell would anyone pay for anything when they can download their music for free? Not many people respect any of the artists, if they did they would be buying their albums.

That's the same logic people used when cable TV first came out. "Why would anyone pay for TV when they can get it for free?" Easy: because if you pay for TV you'll get extra stuff. The same should go for a pay-per-track music system. And we do have something like that out: iTunes. As far as I can tell Apple doesn't seem to think it's a bad thing. In fact they seem to be moving on with it quite nicely. The only thing really holding them back is the restriction to Apple-based Operating Systems.

The DMCA did not cover AIMster because it was a centralized server that had been proven to be used nearly exclusively for piracy. On top of that AIMster didn't have any sort of option to allow legal text to be displayed upon user connection. With FTPs and fservs it's integrated into the system. And honestly, how many people running fservs have you heard of being prosecuted for information on that fserv?