hi..
i also like reading his posts
i chuckle when i see a model name with the trademark next to it
I commented only on this part of his post I didn't suggest that he should go about revealing confidential information etc.I was under the impression that he had access to this internal website called "mark" It just struck me as little odd that he had no desire to learn how well it performs, that's all. If he doesn't, then it changes things.I havent seen anything on the performance of our next generation of processors
but even at 1200Mhz it would score ~800pts in GPU subtest while (now old) Trinity gets 1360pts and Richland will score even more more(~10-15%) on stock. Drivers can be tuned though so I suppose 3dmark11 will be higher on the retail product, but it won't come close to Trinity. Also performance in games might be different than these tests so iGPU performance is still unknown.
IntelEnthusiast does a fantastic job in my opinion discussing the things he can discuss
So Haswell really sucks. Worse than jump from Sandy Bridge to Ivy Bridge.
Probably what he cares most about is keeping his job, not losing it by giving out confidential information before the NDA is lifted. (Not sure if you were just joking, but I assume not, so I gave a serious answer.)
Actually I am very impressed by his posts in general, very upfront about his affiliation and gives guarded and carefully thought out answers, not some type of fan-boy pro-Intel comments.
That's because Trinity is memory BW limited. Richland will bring more performance in the short term and Kaveri is going to bring considerably more performance in ~6 months.Actually, based on Tomshardware tests, its a LOT closer: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-4770k-haswell-performance,3461-6.html
The differences between 4770K's HD 4600 and 5800K's HD 7660D is only about 20%.
The correlation between gaming performance and 3DMark11 is pretty bad on the Trinity parts.
Actually, based on Tomshardware tests, its a LOT closer: http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/core-i7-4770k-haswell-performance,3461-6.html
The differences between 4770K's HD 4600 and 5800K's HD 7660D is only about 20%.
The correlation between gaming performance and 3DMark11 is pretty bad on the Trinity parts.
Thats a big fail on the 300$ Core i7 part compared to the 120$ AMD APU and we didnt started taking the driver and image quality situation into more thorough review. Clearly nobody wants to pay more for the crappy Intel igpus on the quadcore line, i personally would welcome an extra 1-2 core for the Intel gpu diespace but Intel wants us to pay for its crappy graphics, i dont buy it.
Well from looking at the sales figures, apparently people care more about CPU performance and efficiency than they do about igpu performance.
Well from looking at the sales figures, apparently people care more about CPU performance and efficiency than they do about igpu performance.
99% of people dont know the difference between the CPU and GPU.
Because thanks to viral marketing they think that GPU is less
important than CPU...
Ask the guys that did buy laptops with crap integrated gfx ,
the gpu rendered the thing obsolete long before the cpu was
itself oudated , as proved by the DT that kept working well
once the GFX card was upgraded.
Mark my words , SB based laptops with IG will be outdated
long before Llano based ones despite its lower CPU perfs.
More than you think....
Between 17 and 19% , depending of the quarter , in 2012.
Remember , most laptops have IGPs.
But interesting to get an actual die shot! With enough motherboard real estate in the shot to make an educated guess as to the die space. Starting with the larger surface mount tantalum capacitors (appear to be of the 6.0x3.2mm and 7.3x4.3mm varieties) we can extrapolate the likely dimensions for the ICH. Given that the previous mobile ICH had a 25x25mm package dimension the most likely figure for this one given those capacitor sizes seems to be 20x20mm.
Thats a big fail on the 300$ Core i7 part compared to the 120$ AMD APU and we didnt started taking the driver and image quality situation into more thorough review. Clearly nobody wants to pay more for the crappy Intel igpus on the quadcore line, i personally would welcome an extra 1-2 core for the Intel gpu diespace but Intel wants us to pay for its crappy graphics, i dont buy it.
?
Other cpu's will have the same igp at very similar clockspeeds.
Anyway, where this really matters is mobile. a10-4600m is about 2/3 the desktop version's power. hd4600 looks like solid competition considering any standard voltage part runs at the same speed as the desktop chips.
The competition is not Trinity but Richland wich will improve
GPU perfs by 20% or so...
http://www.cpu-world.com/news_2013/2013010801_AMD_discloses_performance_of_future_mobile_APUs.html
