Has anyone tried uTorrent yet? Awesome, Fast, Full-featured BitTorrent client **Now with DHT support**

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
I just made the switch from Azereus to this client. It's clean, fast and small. Just how I like it. And it is is FULL FEATURED!!!

Saw the link to the program over at Flexbeta:

http://www.utorrent.com/



v1.2 Build 239

--- 2005-11-09: Version 1.2 (build 328)
- Feature: Remember last tracker url in create tracker window
- Fix: Move completed job was buggy
- Fix: Create multifile torrent was buggy

--- 2005-11-09: Version 1.2 (build 326)
- Feature: Mainline compatible DHT
- Feature: Show tracker url in list.
- Feature: Configurable flags (flags.conf / flags.bmp)
- Feature: Resolve countries using ip->country online database.
- Feature: Autodetect write queue size.
- Feature: Ability to relocate torrents.
- Feature: Show amount of waste bytes.
- Feature: Ability to specify directory where to save with the /directory command line option.
- Feature: Parse the 'nodes' attribute in a torrent.
- Feature: Added remaining column
- Feature: Added Ctrl-C/Ctrl-A in logger window
- Fix: Tracker ip not working.
- Fix: Search box size was limited.
- Fix: Done column wasn't sortable.
- Change: Use less memory for torrents with lots of files.
- Fix: Support moving complete torrents across file systems.
- Fix: Use a little bit less memory in the network code.
- Fix: Use closesocket instead of close when closing ipblocked sockets.
- Fix: >4GB torrents were created incorrectly.
- Fix: Better recovery if resume.dat is missing/damaged.
- Change: Changed default value of flush_files to true.
- Change: New flags.
- Fix: Ignore directories in the autoload dir.
- Change: Show a message if the user is adding a duplicate torrent.
- Fix: Don't rotate trackers in main list
- Change: *.cpl is an unsafe file
- Fix: fixed a status bar flicker issue when going into a menu
- Fix: Prevent listen error if you start up µTorrent immediately after closing it.
 

makken

Golden Member
Aug 28, 2004
1,476
0
76
Azereus is a bloated POS. I had that for a while, but just couldn't stand it anymore, was using upwards of 100MB of ram on big transfers.

Using ABC now, and it works very nicely, hardly notice it in the background even if i'm playing HL2 or something.

I may take a look at this if it's a lot better than ABC.
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
Originally posted by: makken
Azereus is a bloated POS. I had that for a while, but just couldn't stand it anymore, was using upwards of 100MB of ram on big transfers.

Using ABC now, and it works very nicely, hardly notice it in the background even if i'm playing HL2 or something.

I may take a look at this if it's a lot better than ABC.

I've got 4 downloads going (~800MB total) and it's only using 4.1MB of memory.
 

NFS4

No Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
72,636
47
91
Originally posted by: Joemonkey
does it allow for plugins such as safepeer?

Considering how small it is and the fact that it is trying to reduce bloat, probably not. Check out their forums, maybe the author can respond
 

screw3d

Diamond Member
Nov 6, 2001
6,906
1
76
Azureus IS a resource hog no matter how the fanboys put it. You have to be blind to ignore the massive mem consumption and random CPU spikes..

I'm just glad there are better alternatives around like this and BitComet :)
 

KeyserSoze

Diamond Member
Oct 11, 2000
6,048
1
81
ABC for me. Small, clean interface, everything I need. But I will try this when I have time.
 

xtknight

Elite Member
Oct 15, 2004
12,974
0
71
I like it. Better than ABC and Java-based bloated Azureus. Conforms to Windows common controls interface so it looks just like my Windows theme. Gotta admit you don't have that happen too much. Azureus kept coming up with some stupid WAN disconnection message when there was nothing wrong at all with my connection. I hope this doesn't do the same.
 

PuppettMaster001

Golden Member
May 11, 2002
1,651
4
91
It is pretty nice. Mem usage hasnt gone higher than 3MB compared to Az which would jump to 250MB at times. Nice find, thanks.
 

imported_BadKarma

Senior member
Dec 6, 2004
328
0
0
Okay, I'm sold.
I put up with Azureus because it has the features I need mainly speed scheduling.

Thanks OP.
Buh-Bye Azureus!
 

M0RPH

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,302
1
0
Anyone want to suggest some good sites for finding bitTorrent files while we're at it?
 

MBrown

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2001
5,726
35
91
I have never used any kind of torrent at all. I might have to get into it.
 

igowerf

Diamond Member
Jun 27, 2000
7,697
1
76
Wow. Very, very cool program. Only thing missing is some way to manage the queue.
 

thawolfman

Lifer
Dec 9, 2001
11,107
0
76
Can it resume something I'm already downloading something w/ Azureus? That's the only thing from holding me back from trying it now. :)
 

Nothinman

Elite Member
Sep 14, 2001
30,672
0
0
Can it resume something I'm already downloading something w/ Azureus? That's the only thing from holding me back from trying it now.

All torrents should be interchangable, there's no real state kept on the disk so worst case scenario it has to checksum all of the data you already have.
 

Excelsior

Lifer
May 30, 2002
19,047
18
81
It used 10MB compared to 40MB for bit tornado, but it also was considerably slower.

Hmm...still needs some work, but I like where they are going with it.
 

thawolfman

Lifer
Dec 9, 2001
11,107
0
76
Originally posted by: Nothinman
Can it resume something I'm already downloading something w/ Azureus? That's the only thing from holding me back from trying it now.

All torrents should be interchangable, there's no real state kept on the disk so worst case scenario it has to checksum all of the data you already have.

Easy enough.
 

Bozono

Banned
Aug 17, 2005
2,883
0
0
2.5mb...5 torrents. This fits my bill. Very simplistic looking which I like. So far it has replaced BitComet for me. Thanks for the link OP.