Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: Howard
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: Howard
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: NanoStuff
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Originally posted by: NanoStuff
Originally posted by: Extelleron
Though, if you want a REAL audio setup:
McIntosh MC2KW Mono Block Amps $30,000EA x2 = $60,000
McIntosh C1000 Pre-amplifier = $18,000~
Pair of McIntosh XRT2K loudspeakers. $40,000EA x2 = $80,000/pr
McIntosh MCD201 CD player = $3,0000
TOTAL = $161,000
😉
http://www.mcintoshlabs.com/mcprod/shop...aker+Systems&prodid=1114&product=XRT2K
Real as in a real waste of cash or did I miss your point?
I'm all for good audio, but there's a distinct difference between getting good equipment and a foolish expense.
Don't kid yourself- if you had the money you'd buy it in a flash, just like I would. Listen to a system like that and then tell me it's "foolish."
If I had the cash I'd buy myself a superior sounding yet far less expensive system and if nothing else, I'd spend the rest of the $161,000 on several of them and spread it around.
People who have $80,000 to spend on a pair of speakers aren't likely to have an ignorance level high enough to blow it on such an inferior system.
Good luck finding that "superior sounding and less expensive system."
😉
The fact that you call that system "such an inferior system" suggests to me that you aren't quite an audiophile.
What, so something has to be expensive in order to be superior?
If I had enough time and money (and space), I could build a set of speakers that sounded better than the XRT2K while using "plainer" amps and source. Looking at them, they're just glorified line arrays. Great for the "wow" factor but hardly accurate if you're looking for live sound reproduction.
Of course you could. Now why would I doubt some random person on the Internet to be able to create a pair of speakers better than the top-of-the line McIntosh, a company known for amazing quality that's been around for 50+ years? :disgust:
If you're so confident they're that great, there must be some reason why. Tell me why they're so good... and please, don't mention anything about them being made by McIntosh. I hope I don't have to explain why.
And yes, I'm afraid I have to ask you to "Explain why" on your McIntosh hating.
I'll answer to your last point first (another straw man, thanks). I don't hate McIntosh. What I do find irritating is not your love for them per se, but your love for them to the exclusion of all else. You must know that it is possible for a reputable manufacturer to build something not deserving of their reputation. You also seem to be a victim of the "pricier is better" mentality.
You mention that you know somebody else who owns them and love them (I'm assuming you are talking about the set you linked to). Certainly they can and probably are excellent speakers as far as line arrays go, with great quality control and likely better fit & finish than a DIY pair. However, a speaker need not be "great" in order for it to "sound good". Perhaps we can define "greatness" as (no particular order):
-flat frequency response both on-axis and off-axis
-no output from enclosure - i.e. an inert box
-controlled directivity (depending on the room)
-low distortion (arguable)
-high sensitivity (arguable)
-aesthetics... this is low on my list
-somewhat flat phase response (arguable)
-build quality
"Good sound" may or may not require the above. Almost all high-end speakers look good and are built well. It's a fact that some aren't as accurate as others. Is accuracy necessary for "good sound"? That depends on what you want to hear. Some people like ribbons, even though it is a fact that they distort more than comparable dome tweeters. The "sparkle" heard from ribbons is likely higher levels of 3rd order or higher harmonic distortion. Nice if you want to hear it, but not if you want to hear only what the live experience was like.
I'll try a different tack: isn't it possible that one could duplicate the McIntosh speaker? If so, it would certainly be at a lower cost, and given that the crossovers, physical spacing, drivers, etc. were all the same, it would sound exactly the same. Then, aside from aesthetics, what's the difference? My point is, you can get the same or better than the McIntosh for a lower price, even commercially. You just have to look harder.
Anyone who knows what they're talking about would
I'll ignore this part, since it's a fallacy. I do agree with auditioning speakers before buying them... but it's not impossible to know you'll like a speaker before hearing it. The mind's a crazy thing.
EDIT: Would you please explain why the McIntosh is a great speaker?