Halo PC Benchmarks?

[Maleficus]

I'd like to see some site have some benchmarks with halo see how it runs for people. Anyone know of a site like this?

Would be nice if Anandtech did this. *hint hint* 😛

 

[AgaBoogaBoo]

I don't think that there are any "official" benchmarks yet, but I'm sure some of the people here could help you out, not that I know of anyone with a beta or anything 😉

 

[Maleficus]

Originally posted by: AgaBooga
I don't think that there are any "official" benchmarks yet, but I'm sure some of the people here could help you out, not that I know of anyone with a beta or anything 😉

I could help myself out with something more than a beta but im looking for an array of testing to see if this game really performs this freaking crappy all across the board.

 

[yllus]

The following was run at 1024x768 @ 32-bit res on the FLT release, or so I hear. 😛

Date / Time: 9/26/2003 9:53:55 PM (33724796ms)
Intel Pentium 4 2.53 GHz @ 2600MHz, 512MB, 128M nVidia GeForce4 Ti4200-8x (DeviceID=0x0281) Driver=6.14.10.4523 Shader=1.3
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Games\Halo\halo.exe -vidmode 1024,768,85 -timedemo (Version=1.0.0.564)

Frames=4700
Total Time=215.88s
Average frame rate=21.77fps

Below 5fps= 8% (time) 0% (frames) (19.182s spent in 13 frames)
Below 10fps= 11% (time) 1% (frames)
Below 15fps= 32% (time) 13% (frames)
Below 20fps= 39% (time) 18% (frames)
Below 25fps= 53% (time) 33% (frames)
Below 30fps= 83% (time) 70% (frames)
Below 40fps= 96% (time) 91% (frames)
Below 50fps= 98% (time) 95% (frames)
Below 60fps= 99% (time) 96% (frames)
Memory used Max=160MB, Min=129MB, Ave=149MB

Suffice it to say, a nearly top of the line system got bitchslapped.

 

[bjc112]

Originally posted by: yllus
The following was run at 1024x768 @ 32-bit res on the FLT release, or so I hear. 😛

Date / Time: 9/26/2003 9:53:55 PM (33724796ms)
Intel Pentium 4 2.53 GHz @ 2600MHz, 512MB, 128M nVidia GeForce4 Ti4200-8x (DeviceID=0x0281) Driver=6.14.10.4523 Shader=1.3
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Games\Halo\halo.exe -vidmode 1024,768,85 -timedemo (Version=1.0.0.564)

Frames=4700
Total Time=215.88s
Average frame rate=21.77fps

Below 5fps= 8% (time) 0% (frames) (19.182s spent in 13 frames)
Below 10fps= 11% (time) 1% (frames)
Below 15fps= 32% (time) 13% (frames)
Below 20fps= 39% (time) 18% (frames)
Below 25fps= 53% (time) 33% (frames)
Below 30fps= 83% (time) 70% (frames)
Below 40fps= 96% (time) 91% (frames)
Below 50fps= 98% (time) 95% (frames)
Below 60fps= 99% (time) 96% (frames)
Memory used Max=160MB, Min=129MB, Ave=149MB

Suffice it to say, a nearly top of the line system got bitchslapped.

That's beta.

The Sept. 30th release should be MUCH different.

 

[Maleficus]

Originally posted by: bjc112

Originally posted by: yllus
The following was run at 1024x768 @ 32-bit res on the FLT release, or so I hear. 😛

Date / Time: 9/26/2003 9:53:55 PM (33724796ms)
Intel Pentium 4 2.53 GHz @ 2600MHz, 512MB, 128M nVidia GeForce4 Ti4200-8x (DeviceID=0x0281) Driver=6.14.10.4523 Shader=1.3
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Games\Halo\halo.exe -vidmode 1024,768,85 -timedemo (Version=1.0.0.564)

Frames=4700
Total Time=215.88s
Average frame rate=21.77fps

Below 5fps= 8% (time) 0% (frames) (19.182s spent in 13 frames)
Below 10fps= 11% (time) 1% (frames)
Below 15fps= 32% (time) 13% (frames)
Below 20fps= 39% (time) 18% (frames)
Below 25fps= 53% (time) 33% (frames)
Below 30fps= 83% (time) 70% (frames)
Below 40fps= 96% (time) 91% (frames)
Below 50fps= 98% (time) 95% (frames)
Below 60fps= 99% (time) 96% (frames)
Memory used Max=160MB, Min=129MB, Ave=149MB

Suffice it to say, a nearly top of the line system got bitchslapped.

That's beta.

The Sept. 30th release should be MUCH different.

no sir its not, i didnt realize we were just gonna post timedemos but...


Date / Time: 9/26/2003 2:32:47 PM (170537937ms)
2100MHz, 512MB, 128M nVidia GeForceFX 5600 Ultra (DeviceID=0x0311) Driver=6.14.10.4403 Shader=2.0
C:\Games\Halo\halo.exe -timedemo (Version=1.0.0.564)
Frames=4700
Total Time=343.35s
Average frame rate=13.69fps
Below 5fps= 5% (time) 0% (frames) (19.152s spent in 20 frames)
Below 10fps= 28% (time) 11% (frames)
Below 15fps= 67% (time) 47% (frames)
Below 20fps= 85% (time) 69% (frames)
Below 25fps= 91% (time) 79% (frames)
Below 30fps= 94% (time) 85% (frames)
Below 40fps= 98% (time) 93% (frames)
Below 50fps= 99% (time) 98% (frames)
Below 60fps= 99% (time) 99% (frames)
Memory used Max=146MB, Min=128MB, Ave=138MB

Date / Time: 9/26/2003 6:59:10 PM (11019453ms)
2100MHz, 512MB, 128M nVidia GeForceFX 5600 Ultra (DeviceID=0x0311) Driver=6.14.10.4403 Shader=1.1
C:\Games\Halo\halo.exe -use11 -vidmode 1024,768,75 -timedemo (Version=1.0.0.564)
Frames=4700
Total Time=199.65s
Average frame rate=23.54fps
Below 5fps= 5% (time) 0% (frames) (11.390s spent in 12 frames)
Below 10fps= 6% (time) 0% (frames)
Below 15fps= 23% (time) 10% (frames)
Below 20fps= 37% (time) 19% (frames)
Below 25fps= 54% (time) 35% (frames)
Below 30fps= 80% (time) 65% (frames)
Below 40fps= 91% (time) 80% (frames)
Below 50fps= 96% (time) 91% (frames)
Below 60fps= 98% (time) 95% (frames)
Memory used Max=148MB, Min=128MB, Ave=140MB

 

[yllus]

Originally posted by: bjc112
That's beta.

The Sept. 30th release should be MUCH different.

The above benchmarks are from the FLT release that came out last night. I've heard rumours of it being beta as well, but nothing definite. You have a link?

 

[Sid59]

ouch .. those don't look too promising.

 

[BudAshes]

Any ati tests?

 

[bjc112]

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: bjc112
That's beta.

The Sept. 30th release should be MUCH different.

The above benchmarks are from the FLT release that came out last night. I've heard rumours of it being beta as well, but nothing definite. You have a link?

I stand corrected then... But i would be more inclined to believe it's beta..

plus a ti4200 is a DX 8 card..

A 9500 Pro upward should perform a bit better.

 

[bjc112]

Originally posted by: Sid59
ouch .. those don't look too promising.

A GF 5600 is just a waste to show how performance will stack up..

I agree, i would like to see something from ATi or even a 5900 Ultra..

🙂

 

[Budman]

Originally posted by: yllus

Originally posted by: bjc112
That's beta.

The Sept. 30th release should be MUCH different.

The above benchmarks are from the FLT release that came out last night. I've heard rumours of it being beta as well, but nothing definite. You have a link?

alt.binaries.comp

 

[Maleficus]

Originally posted by: bjc112

Originally posted by: Sid59
ouch .. those don't look too promising.

A GF 5600 is just a waste to show how performance will stack up..

I agree, i would like to see something from ATi or even a 5900 Ultra..

🙂

I'm sorry i 'only' have a 5600 Ultra...


Date / Time: 26/09/2003 19:57:38 (23049937ms)
3600MHz, 1024MB, 128M ATI Radeon 9700 PRO (DeviceID=0x4e44) Driver=6.14.10.6378 Shader=2.0
F:\Halo\halo.exe -use20 -vidmode 1024,768,100 -timedemo (Version=1.0.0.564)
Frames=4700
Total Time=101.06s
Average frame rate=46.51fps
Below 5fps= 5% (time) 0% (frames) (5.902s spent in 9 frames)
Below 10fps= 6% (time) 0% (frames)
Below 15fps= 6% (time) 0% (frames)
Below 20fps= 6% (time) 0% (frames)
Below 25fps= 8% (time) 1% (frames)
Below 30fps= 18% (time) 7% (frames)
Below 40fps= 34% (time) 18% (frames)
Below 50fps= 52% (time) 36% (frames)
Below 60fps= 77% (time) 65% (frames)
Memory used Max=159MB, Min=129MB, Ave=148MB

 

[Adul]

I hear it is not.

 

[Acanthus]

wouldnt beta still have debug code and run significantly slower than release?

 

[Gonad the Barbarian]

More here:
http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?s=4d5ff82e59f4c86c713a2e11eae9da5d&threadid=33713426

 

[Maleficus]

Originally posted by: Gonad the Barbarian
More here:
http://www.rage3d.com/board/showthread.php?s=4d5ff82e59f4c86c713a2e11eae9da5d&threadid=33713426

thanks.

such potential all ruined 🙁

 

[cmdrdredd]

Originally posted by: yllus
The following was run at 1024x768 @ 32-bit res on the FLT release, or so I hear. 😛

Date / Time: 9/26/2003 9:53:55 PM (33724796ms)
Intel Pentium 4 2.53 GHz @ 2600MHz, 512MB, 128M nVidia GeForce4 Ti4200-8x (DeviceID=0x0281) Driver=6.14.10.4523 Shader=1.3
C:\Program Files\Microsoft Games\Halo\halo.exe -vidmode 1024,768,85 -timedemo (Version=1.0.0.564)

Frames=4700
Total Time=215.88s
Average frame rate=21.77fps

Below 5fps= 8% (time) 0% (frames) (19.182s spent in 13 frames)
Below 10fps= 11% (time) 1% (frames)
Below 15fps= 32% (time) 13% (frames)
Below 20fps= 39% (time) 18% (frames)
Below 25fps= 53% (time) 33% (frames)
Below 30fps= 83% (time) 70% (frames)
Below 40fps= 96% (time) 91% (frames)
Below 50fps= 98% (time) 95% (frames)
Below 60fps= 99% (time) 96% (frames)
Memory used Max=160MB, Min=129MB, Ave=149MB

Suffice it to say, a nearly top of the line system got bitchslapped.

Ti4200 is 2 generations old now. Not top of the line at all and not a DX9 part which is what Halo uses some of

 

[0roo0roo]

yea, i bet a lower end cpu with a better videocard could beat his system. its not all about the cpu beyond a certain point for most games now.

 

[bjc112]

Originally posted by: Maleficus

Originally posted by: bjc112

Originally posted by: Sid59
ouch .. those don't look too promising.

A GF 5600 is just a waste to show how performance will stack up..

I agree, i would like to see something from ATi or even a 5900 Ultra..

🙂

I'm sorry i 'only' have a 5600 Ultra...


Date / Time: 26/09/2003 19:57:38 (23049937ms)
3600MHz, 1024MB, 128M ATI Radeon 9700 PRO (DeviceID=0x4e44) Driver=6.14.10.6378 Shader=2.0
F:\Halo\halo.exe -use20 -vidmode 1024,768,100 -timedemo (Version=1.0.0.564)
Frames=4700
Total Time=101.06s
Average frame rate=46.51fps
Below 5fps= 5% (time) 0% (frames) (5.902s spent in 9 frames)
Below 10fps= 6% (time) 0% (frames)
Below 15fps= 6% (time) 0% (frames)
Below 20fps= 6% (time) 0% (frames)
Below 25fps= 8% (time) 1% (frames)
Below 30fps= 18% (time) 7% (frames)
Below 40fps= 34% (time) 18% (frames)
Below 50fps= 52% (time) 36% (frames)
Below 60fps= 77% (time) 65% (frames)
Memory used Max=159MB, Min=129MB, Ave=148MB

That's more like it..

But damn 3.6ghz and still only pushing 40 frames..

 

[Sid59]

not to mention the 9700 pro .. which isn't a slouch in itself.

 

[bjc112]

Originally posted by: Sid59
not to mention the 9700 pro .. which isn't a slouch in itself.

Forgot to add that..

I'll still wait till Sept 30th to judge the game.

 

[Maleficus]

Originally posted by: bjc112

Originally posted by: Sid59
not to mention the 9700 pro .. which isn't a slouch in itself.

Forgot to add that..

I'll still wait till Sept 30th to judge the game.

I would NOT NOT NOT suggest buying this game bro. Wait and see how it performs for other people since everyone thinks retail will be so much different...

 

[BenSkywalker]

I would NOT NOT NOT suggest buying this game bro. Wait and see how it performs for other people since everyone thinks retail will be so much different...

You'd skip one of the best games of the year because you had to lower settings to see high framerates?

 

[bjc112]

Originally posted by: Maleficus

Originally posted by: bjc112

Originally posted by: Sid59
not to mention the 9700 pro .. which isn't a slouch in itself.

Forgot to add that..

I'll still wait till Sept 30th to judge the game.

I would NOT NOT NOT suggest buying this game bro. Wait and see how it performs for other people since everyone thinks retail will be so much different...

😕

That's what I just said, It's release is set for Sept. 30th, until then i'll wait... I played the Beta and it seemd "ok" but nothing i wouldn't expect from a beta.