HA! MythBusters WRONG!! Ninja myth show last night

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
no shock.

they do quick trials on the stuff. its not 100% accurate.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
Originally posted by: waggy
no shock.

they do quick trials on the stuff. its not 100% accurate.

both Adam and Jamie said. "BUSTED" a human is not fast enough to catch a arrow.
 

b0mbrman

Lifer
Jun 1, 2001
29,470
1
81
He also has a professional consulting and coaching program where he teaches Streetwise Real Estate Investing and Streetwise No BS Business Management.

Heh heh.
 

Phokus

Lifer
Nov 20, 1999
22,994
779
126
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: waggy
no shock.

they do quick trials on the stuff. its not 100% accurate.

both Adam and Jamie said. "BUSTED" a human is not fast enough to catch a arrow.

who tried to catch it? if it wasn't someone who was trained then it's a stupid myth to try to bust.
 

OutHouse

Lifer
Jun 5, 2000
36,410
616
126
they first adam tried and caught it with jamie only doing a half draw on the bow. they then made a mechanical hand and they had to ramp up the speed of the hand to like 10X faster than what they thought a human hand can close at.
 

mugs

Lifer
Apr 29, 2003
48,920
46
91
Originally posted by: Citrix
they first adam tried and caught it with jamie only doing a half draw on the bow. they then made a mechanical hand and they had to ramp up the speed of the hand to like 10X faster than what they thought a human hand can close at.

I guess the myth that mythbusters busts myths is busted. ;) How much wood could a woodchuck chuck...
 

LordMaul

Lifer
Nov 16, 2000
15,168
1
0
I don't think they were truly wrong... because if you notice, the guy PUSHES on the arrow against his hand and then closes his fingers down on it - he doesn't just clamp his hand down and stop it mid-flight. Very different.
 

TheChort

Diamond Member
May 20, 2003
4,203
0
76
Originally posted by: LordMaul
I don't think they were truly wrong... because if you notice, the guy PUSHES on the arrow against his hand and then closes his fingers down on it - he doesn't just clamp his hand down and stop it mid-flight. Very different.

so Mythbusters used the wrong technique for catching the arrow
doesn't that mean they still "Mis-Busted" the myth?
 

smack Down

Diamond Member
Sep 10, 2005
4,507
0
0
Originally posted by: TheChort
Originally posted by: LordMaul
I don't think they were truly wrong... because if you notice, the guy PUSHES on the arrow against his hand and then closes his fingers down on it - he doesn't just clamp his hand down and stop it mid-flight. Very different.

so Mythbusters used the wrong technique for catching the arrow
doesn't that mean they still "Mis-Busted" the myth?

Mythbusters where just to close to the bow to have time to catch the arrow.
 

ultimatebob

Lifer
Jul 1, 2001
25,134
2,450
126
You should be complaining on the Mythbusters web site, not this one! If they get enough complaints, they'll retest it.
 

TheChort

Diamond Member
May 20, 2003
4,203
0
76
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
You should be complaining on the Mythbusters web site, not this one! If they get enough complaints, they'll retest it.

That's true!
They've done it before!
 

foghorn67

Lifer
Jan 3, 2006
11,883
63
91
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
They're not very bright... they don't have a grip on basic science.

Yes they do. But they realize a proper 'scientific' process will take months.
 

Jeff7

Lifer
Jan 4, 2001
41,596
20
81
Originally posted by: foghorn67
Originally posted by: KillerCharlie
They're not very bright... they don't have a grip on basic science.

Yes they do. But they realize a proper 'scientific' process will take months.
And they said at some point that the show is also about entertainment, and it is meant to appeal to a general audience. If it was purely "science" based, it wouldn't be quite so entertaining. It'd take an entire season to bust one myth, and an episode might consist of showing 50 trials of the same test to obtain a good statistical sampling. They are also not genius-type stereotypical scientists. There's some humor and fun injected into the format.
It's not pure science. It's a bit of sciencey stuff with entertainment thrown into the mix.


They also have to limit the amount of the dreaded "Science Content" or else they might bore and lose viewers. I'm surprised they didn't have such a segment for the Birds in a Trailer episode - if a lot of birds in a truck suddenly take flight, will the truck get lighter? Of course it won't. The total mass of the truck remains constant. The center of mass may shift, but overall, you've still got a bunch of birds, some air, and a truck. The only difference is that, when they're standing still, their weight is countered by the reactionary force of the ground pushing up. When they're in flight, their weight is countered by a reactionary force of the air on their wings. But still, same mass, same gravitational field, same weight. Why they didn't include a simple explanation like this, I don't know. It would have been nice to see included. Oh well.
 

Alone

Diamond Member
Nov 19, 2006
7,490
0
0
Wasn't there a Ripley's Believe It or Not episode where a guy does this?
 

purbeast0

No Lifer
Sep 13, 2001
53,654
6,532
126
Originally posted by: Phokus
Originally posted by: Citrix
Originally posted by: waggy
no shock.

they do quick trials on the stuff. its not 100% accurate.

both Adam and Jamie said. "BUSTED" a human is not fast enough to catch a arrow.

who tried to catch it? if it wasn't someone who was trained then it's a stupid myth to try to bust.

You should be banned for your sig taking up 15 pages.