[H] Far Cry Primal performance review

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.

moonbogg

Lifer
Jan 8, 2011
10,731
3,440
136
Game looks fairly pretty. Seems to be pretty demanding GPU wise. I can pimp it, but I'll spare my ring hand and let this one go. Too many damn games coming out. Have to quit my job and abandon my family to play them all.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
I find it very interesting, almost entertaining, the way the graphs and visuals aren't matching the narrative lately with [H]'s reviews. Ever since the Nano debacle where [H] went on a rant before they got the card and then AMD didn't send them one.
 

Bacon1

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2016
3,430
1,018
91
I find it very interesting, almost entertaining, the way the graphs and visuals aren't matching the narrative lately with [H]'s reviews. Ever since the Nano debacle where [H] went on a rant before they got the card and then AMD didn't send them one.

Yep, there is a good post over on reddit about it. Shows their bias between when Nvidia is faster vs when AMD is.
 

swilli89

Golden Member
Mar 23, 2010
1,558
1,181
136
Taking [H] off my bookmark bar. I really dislike vendor bias, including any AMD bias (although it seems to be a bit more rare for whichever reason).

Like its been from the very start almost two decades ago, unless you are one of the general gamers that plays every latest AAA release, you should seek out the games you play and judge a potential purchase on those games.
 

Elixer

Lifer
May 7, 2002
10,371
762
126
This is typical of that site, has been going on a long time.
Question them about their neutrality? They ban you.
Bring up proof that they are doing skewed results? They ban you.

They are just paid shills. Nothing more.
 

Madpacket

Platinum Member
Nov 15, 2005
2,068
326
126
I used to shrug off people saying the [H] are a bunch of biased **** but after this review it's fairly obvious what they're doing here. With AMD turning the tide lately it's pretty embarrassing watching how desperate the pro green camp is becoming.
 

maddie

Diamond Member
Jul 18, 2010
5,147
5,523
136
I suppose everyone read their forum thread salivating at moving away from framerate measurements and using purely subjective values. I suppose no one can point to hypocrisy in their reviews then.
 

Bacon1

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2016
3,430
1,018
91
I suppose everyone read their forum thread salivating at moving away from framerate measurements and using purely subjective values. I suppose no one can point to hypocrisy in their reviews then.

Yeah it was sad how badly they wanted it to be just on "how we felt the gameplay was".... they were good when they were the only ones doing actual in game testing, except it was still upto their preference on IQ settings for cards. Finally after pressure they added Apples to Apples testing, but always hated it and downplayed it or used obscure settings that didn't run on either card.

They've also brainwashed half their fanbase to believe that Ashes is only a benchmark and not an actual game, let alone one that is releasing in two weeks.

Brent's post saying the Primal graphics are a downgrade is... yeah...

Far Cry Primal is a visual downgrade from Far Cry 4, I stand by that. All the features I mentioned that were in Far Cry 4, are not in Far Cry Primal, that is a fact.

The visuals feel hollow to me, compared to Far Cry 4. I've been using Far Cry 4 for over a year now, so I have a pretty good idea how that game feels visually, and this one doesn't add up. It's not the worse looking game, and at 4K, and from a distance, it looks ok. Up close, examining each feature, it doesn't add up.

It is missing things that modern games visually have today, and this one just flat out doesn't, point of fact. It is a game that could have been released several years ago, visually, it doesn't represent or come near to the features implemented today in games like Rise of the Tomb Raider, Hitman, and other DX12 forward looking games that we will be adding to our gaming suite. Those games are better addtions to our gaming suite as they push the gaming industry forward, so we will be adding them, this game, Far Cry Primal, does not. I stand by my analysis.

bD5nZZa.jpg&hash=3892c8ff30144659d4eaeb2b55f258cd


OdGZ2ah.jpg&hash=0d177d6d983301d585f4f5968d7d25ce
 

IllogicalGlory

Senior member
Mar 8, 2013
934
346
136
Ironically, one of the best looking games ever, Star Wars Battlefront, runs at 60 FPS high settings at 4K with a single 980 Ti/Fury X.
Just the fact that a single-GPU can potentially play this game at the highest possible game settings at 4K just shows how non-graphically challenging Far Cry Primal truly is.
That line is just utterly baffling. You can find plenty of terrible looking games that run at 10 FPS at 4K (most Unreal 4 games), doesn't make them worthy benchmarks. That thinking just makes absolutely no sense, whatsoever. My brain just can't understand the "thought" that went into that. Can't wait for them to add ARK to their benchmark suite! I mean, a 980 Ti gets 9 FPS on 4K Ultra. Must be a really great looking game. There's a DX12 patch on the way too.
 
Last edited:

Bacon1

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2016
3,430
1,018
91
Yeah their idea of "Game runs well, not worth of benchmarking" was apparent when they did Alien Isolation which they gave major props to and even liked how it used open technologies, yet didn't include it in benchmarks because it was so optimized...

And yeah, they never even tested Star Wars Battlefront did they?
 

Raising

Member
Mar 12, 2016
120
0
16
What's the point of a benchmark without overclocking both cards ? the 980ti can get at least 20% more performance..
 

littleg

Senior member
Jul 9, 2015
355
38
91
Maybe the devs should code it to clock the GPU down to 100MHz, they'd get glowing reviews from [H]. Everyone without a brain knows the lower the fps the better the game.
 

Erenhardt

Diamond Member
Dec 1, 2012
3,251
105
101
My vote goes for Cryptomining in the background for the devloper.

1 Make games cheaper,
2 Include mining troyan,
3. ?????
4. profit ฿฿฿
5.Get better reviews for killing perf,
6. Be on the front page every time new GPU is reviewed.
 

Innokentij

Senior member
Jan 14, 2014
237
7
81
Nice performance on the game, but sadly without HBAO+ and hairworks im not gonna bother, will just look like a consoll game without and wont make me feel special pc master race.
 

3DVagabond

Lifer
Aug 10, 2009
11,951
204
106
What's the point of a benchmark without overclocking both cards ? the 980ti can get at least 20% more performance..

Depends on what card they are using, never mind silicon lottery. A lot of cards boost to 1300-1400 right out of the box. Especially the ones they send reviewers. No 20% more perf from O/C'ing happening there.
 

Mahigan

Senior member
Aug 22, 2015
573
0
0
Nice performance on the game, but sadly without HBAO+ and hairworks im not gonna bother, will just look like a consoll game without and wont make me feel special pc master race.

“To have the choice between proprietary software packages, is being able to choose your master. Freedom means not having a master. And in the area of computing, freedom means not using proprietary software.” — Richard Stallman

Oh and Happy Birthday, Richard Stallman, born on March, 16 1953.
 

AtenRa

Lifer
Feb 2, 2009
14,003
3,362
136
My vote goes for Cryptomining in the background for the devloper.

1 Make games cheaper,
2 Include mining troyan,
3. ?????
4. profit ฿฿฿
5.Get better reviews for killing perf,
6. Be on the front page every time new GPU is reviewed.

:D
 

AtenRa

Lifer
Feb 2, 2009
14,003
3,362
136
I actually care a lot about new technologies and better graphics but I want to be able to have the same options with every GPU vendor. One year I may have a AMD GPU and then I may get a new NV GPU. I want to be able to play the same games with the SAME GRAPHICS ON BOTH GPUs and be optimized for both of them.

If NV want proprietary on PC Games we will make them forget about it.

To NVIDIA, better spend our money (you do know it is our money you are spending for the GW crap do you ??) for better GPU designs and open software for every Gamer. Spend our money to make better products and let Game devs create beautiful Games with lots of new graphics features optimized for every Gamer.
 

Innokentij

Senior member
Jan 14, 2014
237
7
81
“To have the choice between proprietary software packages, is being able to choose your master. Freedom means not having a master. And in the area of computing, freedom means not using proprietary software.” — Richard Stallman

Oh and Happy Birthday, Richard Stallman, born on March, 16 1953.

Your master is DirectX so duno what u on about, linux threads > that way
 
Status
Not open for further replies.