[Guru3D] Galaxytech GeForce GTX 780 Ti Spec Sheet Leaks

[desprado]

here has been a lot of speculation on the GeForce GTX 780 Ti, will it be a fully fetched GK110 GPU or an overclocked GeForce GTX 780 ? Well, that speculation comes to an end as a product slipped out of the Galaxytech website showing everything you need to know about the GeForce GTX 780 Ti, and guys. It won't get any better then this. It is a full GK110 GPU with 2880 Shader processors running a 876 MHz core clock with a boost frequency to 928 MHz. The memory is receiving a bump as well to 7 Gbps. The board is based on a 3GB framebuffer running a 384-bit memory bus. So with all that in mind and aside from the 6GB memory the Titan has, this card should beat GeForce GTX Titan by a good margin while its a whole lot cheaper as well.
GALAXY:

GALAXY GeForce GTX 780 Ti is our fastest single-GPU card ever, combining turbocharged power with exciting new technologies that make every game come to life like never before. This is pure performance accelerated to the extreme, giving PC gamers the freedom to play every title at ultra setting and max resolutions on today’s highest-definition displays.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti will support GPU Boost 2.0, Adaptive V-Sync, NVIDIA Surround and PhysX, DirectX 11.2, 3D Vision, QUAD-SLI and OpenGL 4.4. The GTX 780 Ti is equipped with 6+8pin power connectors, recommended PSU is 600 watt or greater.

​

Here's that slide originating from Galaxy Technology. Thanks to Asder00 for spotting this one.
http://www.guru3d.com/news_story/galaxytech_geforce_gtx_780_ti_spec_sheet_leaks.html


Hail to the King of Kings

Warning issued for inflammatory language.
-- stahlhart

 

[Techhog]

This really is going to turn into an even worse version of the Intel vs AMD situation, isn't it?

You must be new here.
-- stahlhart

 

[blackened23]

Awesome. Hopefully we'll have aftermarket 780ti options as well - sounds like the performance of reference will be outstanding, and aftermarket will easily be +10% or more on top of that.

 

[desprado]

Awesome. Hopefully we'll have aftermarket 780ti options as well - sounds like the performance of reference will be outstanding, and aftermarket will easily be +10% or more on top of that.

It is 15% faster than GTX 780 but i think they miss Vram they could have increased that so that 4k would not have been a problem against R90x

 

[OILFIELDTRASH]

This really is going to turn into an even worse version of the Intel vs AMD situation, isn't it?

Yeah except for the fact it's actually competitive in the gpu market... My last 3 cards have been amd due to the fact they are such tremendous value for the money. Sure nvidia usually makes the fastest card. The problem is that I don't have the better part of a thousand dollars to spend on a graphics card.

 

[boxleitnerb]

With these specs, it will be 25% faster than the 780. 25% more CUDA cores and on top of that slightly higher clocks and faster memory.

 

[desprado]

With these specs, it will be 25% faster than the 780. 25% more CUDA cores and on top of that slightly higher clocks and faster memory.

Normally it is made for 4k that was said by Nvidia when they announced it.

 

[Jaydip]

I believe we will see custom cards with 6GB but it will come with a price premium.

 

[wand3r3r]

Does titan sli break 3GB atm?

 

[tviceman]

With these specs, it will be 25% faster than the 780. 25% more CUDA cores and on top of that slightly higher clocks and faster memory.

Yep, this thing is going to be a complete beast. Power consumption shouldn't be much different at all than a regular gtx780.

 

[tviceman]

It is 15% faster than GTX 780 but i think they miss Vram they could have increased that so that 4k would not have been a problem against R90x

The only "problem" it will have against the R290x is in 4k resolutions with AA, AKA unplayable frame rates for either card to begin with. This card is going to be 15% faster, cooler, quieter, and with lower power consumption, but will come with a $150 price premium over the R290x.

 

[Techhog]

Yeah except for the fact it's actually competitive in the gpu market... My last 3 cards have been amd due to the fact they are such tremendous value for the money. Sure nvidia usually makes the fastest card. The problem is that I don't have the better part of a thousand dollars to spend on a graphics card.

$1000 will be for midrange NVidia at this rate. New cards are cool and all, but the death of competition in the high-end segment is really terrible. If AMD were competitive against Intel, there would be 6-core i7s on the consumer platform and 8-core i7s on the enthusiast platform right now, and 8/12 respectively next year. How will not having competition affect NVidia?

 

[blackened23]

This really is going to turn into an even worse version of the Intel vs AMD situation, isn't it?

Nah. AMD has always been competitive in terms of GPUs, but they have not been competitive whatsoever with CPUs; they may not match the 700$ NV offering but they really don't have to - the market for lower price GPUs is larger anyway. Intel just completely outclasses them in that respect. On the other hand, AMD has always had attractive GPU offerings in terms of price/performance and even on the high end as well - they may not always perform as well as NV, but they're very close and therefore competitive. In any case I don't put AMD GPUs and CPUs in the same category at all. They make good GPUs still, CPUs? Not so much. Their GPU situation isn't like an 8150 getting beat by a 4 year old i3 in terms of IPC - the GPU situation is far different, they are still very competitive.

 

[parvadomus]

I doubt it will beat 290X @ 4K or eyefinity.

 

[DarkKnightDude]

Yeah, there's not that many people who will buy 700 dollar video cards, I think the 150-200 dollars is the sweet spot.

 

[SlowSpyder]

I'm surprised Nvidia will release a fully spec'd Kepler at this price, that's great considering $1000 'only' got you a less than fully spec'd part without much hope for anything better just a month ago. My guess is the board will largely be based from current designs, so we may see non-reference parts pretty soon after launch, maybe even launching with the reference 780Ti.

I wonder if AMD will have a response, I think they have room to stretch the 290X's legs yet. Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the 290X @ ~800MHz ~10% faster than the 780? I wonder if AMD might release a GHz Edition 290X that has a good cooler, matches the 780Ti's price, and simply doesn't throttle down. AMD has a lot of room in memory speed, too.

And I here I thought 28nm had gotten boring, that we had seen all the fireworks between the two companies already. 28nm graphics wars, round 2 in full swing!

 

[imaheadcase]

The only "problem" it will have against the R290x is in 4k resolutions with AA, AKA unplayable frame rates for either card to begin with. This card is going to be 15% faster, cooler, quieter, and with lower power consumption, but will come with a $150 price premium over the R290x.

AA at 4k. lol

 

[imaheadcase]

Yeah, there's not that many people who will buy 700 dollar video cards, I think the 150-200 dollars is the sweet spot.

$700 is midrange to lots of people, including me.

 

[The Alias]

doesn't Hawaii have a round of driver improvements coming with the 290 (non x) launch on thursday that were supposed to increase perf ? Either way I don't see how the 780ti is going to be that much more powerful than a titan with reference coolers, considering it doesn't even have 10% more sp and they're gonna boost to the same clocks ANYWAY (lol :biggrin so maybe a %10 increase over the Titan cause of the slightly higher boost speeds, but for $150 more than the 290x, the 780ti is beyond meh . what I'd like to see aftermarket boards for the 290x with custom pcbs vs aftermarket 780ti's . Now that would provide true clarity as to who's silicone is the best .

 

[Nintendesert]

$700 is midrange to lots of people, including me.

That's nice. The sales numbers and hardware polls however don't back you up.

 

[toyota]

AA at 4k. lol

there is nothing magical at 4k on a 32 inch screen and you can still end up needing it for some games. But you are also the person who claims to get no tearing in any game so surely you can't even see aliasing anyway.

 

[Skurge]

Nice... I don't know how you guys think it will use the same amount of power as a 780. Maybe Titan cause it has less RAM.

In any case. I hope this doesn't turn into a 7800GTX 512MB situation where the GPUs are basically non existant.

 

[moonbogg]

290x seems to do better in BF4. 780ti will be playing catch up. Id buy the AMD card first. $700 is [an inferior purchase decision in comparison].

Warning issued for inappropriate language.
-- stahlhart

 

[Atreidin]

$700 is midrange to lots of people, including me.

I thought I was the only one who got video cards with platinum trim and 22K gold heatsinks with custom filigree.

Warning issued for thread crapping.
-- stahlhart

 

[exar333]

Look's great but still makes me wonder if I should bite or wait for 20nm. Thinking about getting 50-100% more of these on a single card makes me pretty excited.

You can't say both AMD and NV have not squeezed every ounce of performance from 28nm at this point...