• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Guns Are Number 1!

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,876
136
You can't understand this. Not your fault.


pretentious
Adjective

pre·ten·tious | \ pri-ˈten(t)-shəs \

Definition of pretentious

1: characterized by pretension: such as

a: making usually unjustified or excessive claims (as of value or standing)the pretentious fraud who assumes a love of culture that is alien to him

b: expressive of affected, unwarranted, or exaggerated importance, worth, or stature
 
Last edited:

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,876
136
At that point the odds involved may not even approach that of smoking or driving your car without the belt, however, you see how not all gun owners is as responsible as you are right? So maybe it would be fair to prove that you are said level of responsible, license, whatever?


Not only that I STRONGLY suspect OTHER PEOPLE may well be aware that he has those valuable guns locked up in his house.

Nothing between him, his family and an armed robber breaking into his house (unaware they're in a safe) and attempting to steal said guns but AIR AND OPPOURTUNITY.

;)
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,876
136
You have failed to convince me. I am keeping my guns and still oppose more gun legislation.

Convince you of what exactly? :D

I said ZERO about gun-laws and I couldn't care less if per your "feelings" facts are "not convincing" to you. (ROTFL)

You and your guns are fine.... just STAY far away from me with your false sense of security. (I hope you and your family never learn the hard way how those statistics were compiled)
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,749
6,763
126
I am looking at the whole picture - that’s the point. You are more likely to be the victim of homicide and suicide by owning a gun so if you’re owning one to protect yourself you are making a foolish decision. Don’t take my word for it, there is a large body of empirical research that establishes this.

Every gun owner is a responsible and law abiding citizen until they aren’t. There are plenty of dead people who viewed themselves just like you do.
I don't own guns to protect myself. That is a side potential. I have many guns by inheritance and only bought one someone who needed money years ago sold me, that is until recently, when, having time on my hands, I became curious about them again. For me they are masterpieces of artistic and engineering genius. Had I money to waste I would be a collector.

Lately, the AR 15 is in the news. It differs from the standard hunting rifle in Lego-like modularity. It offers an interesting challenge to people with a mechanical inclination and a desire to master detail and complexity as a form of entertainment.

The only statistic, as I said, that interests me in owning a gun is how likely it is for someone to successfully assault me armed as opposed to unarmed. I am not the slightest bit worried I would shoot somebody in a fit of temper, by accident, or that I would kill myself with one. The last time I thought seriously about suicide was before I woke up one night long ago realizing that everything I had ever hoped for had always been hidden deeply within me.
Sorry .... not running with "worthless" and I don't hate myself either. (even though I CAN be a real douchebag sometimes!)

;)

Thanks for wishing me good luck though! :p



*(AND that's MR Douchebag thank you very much!)
I did mention, did I not, it would be the last thing you would ever want to know.
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,876
136
I did mention, did I not, it would be the last thing you would ever want to know.


Here is where you've failed to effectively communicate .... care to explain what exactly "IT" is in this case?

;)

And just falling back on "you wouldn't understand" repeatedly in actuality means that YOU are the one incapable of explaining.

Remember if you can't explain it to a 5-year old, you don't actually understand "IT" yourself... this applies nicely here.


And this is my favorite from Who's Next. :)


WhosNext_Web980px.jpg


The story behind The Who's Who's Next album artwork

How a rubbish dump in County Durham provided the backdrop to The Who's iconic album sleeve
 
Last edited:

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,876
136
Not measurably, no.


You DO grasp that ANYTHING more then zero is "measurable" right? :p

I'm done with this "insightful" debate.

:D

aQR5OpK_460s.jpg



To be clear I sincerely hope your good luck holds out and nobody ever tries to steal those expensive guns you don't hesitate to announce to the world are inside your home.
 
  • Love
Reactions: hal2kilo

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,749
6,763
126
Sorry .... not running with "worthless" and I don't hate myself either.
Here is where you've failed to effectively communicate .... care to explain what exactly "IT" is in this case?
It is "not running with worthless and I don't hate myself either.", that is the last thing you want to know you do feel. Not your fault you don't know it. Not the slightest bit interested in whether you think this makes me pretentious. Wasn't me that made the truth sound pretentious when presented. It just happens to be a threat to our egos which we, out of our victim mentality, turn into something that sounds like an insult. That is only possible because we already feel insulted by believing we are the worst in the world. Why do you suppose that staring at people can be dangerous?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Captante

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,876
136
It is "not running with worthless and I don't hate myself either.", that is the last thing you want to know you do feel. Not your fault you don't know it. Not the slightest bit interested in whether you think this makes me pretentious. Wasn't me that made the truth sound pretentious when presented. It just happens to be a threat to our egos which we, out of our victim mentality, turn into something that sounds like an insult. That is only possible because we already feel insulted by believing we are the worst in the world. Why do you suppose that staring at people can be dangerous?


I'm just trying to understand what you mean not make you feel bad, however you implying that the only reason "other people don't understand" is because they're incapable of it is the very definition of pretentious.

Unlike most here I'm giving you the benefit of a doubt that you MIGHT actually have a point other then "being right".

Am I wasting my time? (stop patting yourself on the back and give me a straight answer)

;)


I think you need to consider the very real possibility... just for a moment... that you COULD be the one who is confused.... I still have zero clue what you're getting at with "IT".
 
Last edited:

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,984
55,388
136
It is "not running with worthless and I don't hate myself either.", that is the last thing you want to know you do feel. Not your fault you don't know it. Not the slightest bit interested in whether you think this makes me pretentious. Wasn't me that made the truth sound pretentious when presented. It just happens to be a threat to our egos which we, out of our victim mentality, turn into something that sounds like an insult. That is only possible because we already feel insulted by believing we are the worst in the world. Why do you suppose that staring at people can be dangerous?
‘If you disagree with me it’s only your own failures to blame’

‘no, I’m not pretentious’
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Captante

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,584
984
126
But it has literally been measured and is strongly statistically significant so this is not true.

Are you saying the research is wrong?

Strongly significant? If I am at low risk of suicide, and I am, owning a gun isn’t going to change that at all… unless you are arguing that guns are a depressant.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,984
55,388
136
Strongly significant? If I am at low risk of suicide, and I am, owning a gun isn’t going to change that at all… unless you are arguing that guns are a depressant.
Do you agree that gun ownership is a statistically significant risk factor for death by suicide or homicide? Yes or no?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captante

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,876
136
Do you agree that gun ownership is a statistically significant risk factor for death by suicide or homicide? Yes or no?

Thought you might need a little practical assistance! :D

s-l400.jpg


*(it's as likely to yield positive results as continued posting in this thread on-topic although I STRONGLY suggest printing it out before any actual head-banging to avoid significant monitor-damage!)


Here is a simple explanation of the logic-skills at play here:



THAT was NEVER 5 minutes! ;)
 
Last edited:

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
72,899
33,999
136
pretentious
Adjective

pre·ten·tious | \ pri-ˈten(t)-shəs \

Definition of pretentious

1: characterized by pretension: such as

a: making usually unjustified or excessive claims (as of value or standing)the pretentious fraud who assumes a love of culture that is alien to him

b: expressive of affected, unwarranted, or exaggerated importance, worth, or stature
In this case, he's been proven correct.
 

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,876
136
In this case, he's been proven correct.


It's just that far as I can tell we've yet to actually establish exactly WHAT the "case" is! (aside from extremely disturbed/confused)

;)

Seriously if you can make those moonbeam-posts appear logical I'll be the first to reach right into this sub-forum and shake your hand!
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
Strongly significant? If I am at low risk of suicide, and I am, owning a gun isn’t going to change that at all… unless you are arguing that guns are a depressant.

I'm depressed when ammo prices are high and it's too expensive to go shooting.
 

fskimospy

Elite Member
Mar 10, 2006
87,984
55,388
136
Thought you might need a little practical assistance! :D

s-l400.jpg


*(it's as likely to yield positive results as continued posting in this thread on-topic although I STRONGLY suggest printing it out before any actual head-banging to avoid significant monitor-damage!)


Here is a simple explanation of the logic-skills at play here:



THAT was NEVER 5 minutes! ;)
Trust me, you don’t have to save me from myself.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Captante

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
Yup, you don't want to shoot it out of a 30 caliber gun that isn't for Russian rounds. You can buy American made Russian rifles even one that is California legal but I am not a fan of featureless. I am studying how what parts to buy for my AR15 full feature build while remaining legal. That requires a max ten round fixed magazine that can legally be changed quickly. Personally, I hope the SC rules that California law unconstitutional. No matter what fire rate I could achieve I have no intention or desire to shoot anybody. Such an act would be the height of immorality and violate all norms on which one can ever have any self respect.

Gotta say, would not have picked you out as on this side of the issue.

Happy building
 
Last edited:

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,353
10,876
136
I'm depressed when ammo prices are high and it's too expensive to go shooting.


To be clear IMO there's nothing wrong with legally owning a gun that you handle responsibly and are properly trained to use. (guns are tools)

However arguing against accurate stats that show how likely you are to have your own gun taken away and used against you when they are based on fact because they are worrisome to you just makes anyone doing so appear to be stupid.

It's sorta like how if you drive your car a lot of miles your more likely to die in a car-accident NO MATTER HOW WELL YOU DRIVE. It's not rocket-science to figure this out.

If it were me I'd prefer to be aware of the risks rather then pretend they don't exist.

;)



Trust me, you don’t have to save me from myself.


Do feel free to carry on! ;)

95b050def6cabf9c7004425cdc773895.jpg
 
Last edited:

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
My father used a 308 and my brother a 30-06 for hunting back in the 70's. I had a lowly 32 special.

If you want to see something crazy, Kentucky Ballistics blew up two 50 cal guns - The Barrett was intentional.

Yeah, dude is lucky to be alive.

IDK if you saw the video of the 700 nitro vs ballistics gel zombie torso. OMG lololol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captante

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,239
136
To be clear IMO there's nothing wrong with legally owning a gun that you handle responsibly and are properly trained to use.

However arguing against accurate stats that show how likely you are to have your own gun taken away and used against you when they are based on fact because they are worrisome to you just makes anyone doing so appear to be stupid.

Sorta like how if you drive your car a lot of miles your more likely to die in a car-accident. It's not rocket-science to figure this out.

If it were me I'd prefer to be aware of the risks.

;)

I'm not a carry dude because they seem of limited value unless if you are highly trained to use it, and from what I have seen at the range, plenty of people with carry guns struggling to put decent groupings on paper at even 5-7 yds.
IDK how they expect it to go if they got into an actual gunfight.

Better off figuring out how to avoid danger than diluting yourself you will conquer it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captante