• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Gunmaker held responsible for murder?!?

misle

Diamond Member
Link to Story

Basically, a student steals a gun from a neighbor, goes to school and shoots a teacher. Now the widow sues the school, the neighbor and the gun manufacturer.

Some of the more interesting snippits:

Pam Grunow's lawsuit accused Valor Corp of distributing a gun that was "unsafe, defective and lacked features that would have prevented a minor from using it."

Since when is it illegal for minors to use firearms? I learned to use firearms when I was about 7-8 years old. 😕

The jury didn't find any liability for Nathanial Brazill, who pulled the trigger.

WTF? Believe it or not, inanimate objects, like firearms, do not get up and walk over and shoot a person by themselves!

I see this getting reversed in an appeal.
 
It's the american way.


I'd like to sue my ex's parent for making her. She's screwed my credit rating 😉
 
I'm really rethinking things. Who's the real problem here? The idiot who filed the lawsuit of the 12 completely retarded jurors who fell for it?
 
Meanwhile the gun is sitting in the evidence room at the police station thinking, "Bwahahahahaha! I tricked them all! It was me all along." Because we know that people don't kill people, guns do. Because they're eeeeeeeeeeevil.
 
😕 😱 :disgust: :| :| <-- conveys emotional range I went thru after reading article

edit:
I'm really rethinking things. Who's the real problem here? The idiot who filed the lawsuit of the 12 completely retarded jurors who fell for it?
The trial lawyer who picked the jury and then sold it to them. :| :|

edit2: and the judge who allowed the farce in his courtroom to proceed.
 
Is this country headed in the right direction or what.

No one is held responsible for his/her own actions anymore.
 
OMG! this is getting really ridiculous, oh well, now it seems like i can do everything i want and blame the result on someone else.

 
I find this abso-fvcking-lutely ridiculous, and I'm generally of the opinion that the US has way too many freaking guns. This is just silly though.

So let me get this straight: if I kill you with a gun then the maker is partly at fault? What if I kill you with a knife?

And what if I'm a brinks security guard and, thanks to using your gun, I get to protect an attempted robbery of $15 million. Well hell I guess I owe you some of that money, right? If not for your gun I could not have done it.

The law can't have double standards. Penalizing gun makers for this thing, and not rewarding them when their guns are used properly is silly. It's silly rewarding them and it's silly penalizing them. Nothing ever said that gun should be used in a crime.

Just retarded. In a country where most people have the legal right to carry a gun you cannot charge a gun maker if his gun is used in a crime, whereas 10,000 other people who have the same gun have done nothing but carry it around to protect themselves. Just so dumb.
 
Originally posted by: SyahM
OMG! this is getting really ridiculous, oh well, now it seems like i can do everything i want and blame the result on someone else.

Yup, it's time for me steal a car and go disreguard traffic laws and run some kids over. I'll just go home and they (the injured and families of the dead) can simply sue GM for producing the car.
 
Also, it is said that the guy stole the gun from his friend's house. Yet why is the friend's family paying for it?
If I sneak into your house and steal your knife, go ST@B someone with it, should you be held responsible for the knife that I stole to ST@B someone? It is stolen after all. How about I steal your car and run someone over? Should you be held responsible?

Stupid jury. I hope the judgement gets reversed in appeals.
 
Why do I click on threads I know will make me sick?

hehe, ATOT forum could be sued for causing me having insomnia.
I've had enough hearing about those stupid lawsuits.
It's time to make all liars, oops, lawyers and those stupid jurors disappeared.
 
Originally posted by: TNTrulez
Also, it is said that the guy stole the gun from his friend's house. Yet why is the friend's family paying for it?
If I sneak into your house and steal your knife, go ST@B someone with it, should you be held responsible for the knife that I stole to ST@B someone? It is stolen after all. How about I steal your car and run someone over? Should you be held responsible?

Stupid jury. I hope the judgement gets reversed in appeals.

Quote
The jury said Grunow's family should get $24 million from the three parties. The school board was told to pay her $10.8 million, and the family friend was told to pay $12 million.

On top of that, the school has to pay up $10.8 million. Ok, in case someone doesn't remember, this kid was sent home by the teacher for throwing water balloons. He went home (or to the house of the friend) and got the unloaded gun, loaded it (can you say intent??), went back to the school and gunned the teacher down in the hallway, killing him with a single bullet. This kid was an honor student. Things like this scare the crap out of me. My wife is a teacher in an alternative education program. Most of the students are good kids, but some of them are certainly not. A number of them have police records. There is one that got a three day vacation thanks to her just the other day. What scares me even more that the thought of something happening to her is the thought of what I'd do as a result. :disgust:
 
Originally posted by: KC5AV
Originally posted by: TNTrulez
Also, it is said that the guy stole the gun from his friend's house. Yet why is the friend's family paying for it?
If I sneak into your house and steal your knife, go ST@B someone with it, should you be held responsible for the knife that I stole to ST@B someone? It is stolen after all. How about I steal your car and run someone over? Should you be held responsible?

Stupid jury. I hope the judgement gets reversed in appeals.

Quote
The jury said Grunow's family should get $24 million from the three parties. The school board was told to pay her $10.8 million, and the family friend was told to pay $12 million.

On top of that, the school has to pay up $10.8 million. Ok, in case someone doesn't remember, this kid was sent home by the teacher for throwing water balloons. He went home (or to the house of the friend) and got the unloaded gun, loaded it (can you say intent??), went back to the school and gunned the teacher down in the hallway, killing him with a single bullet. This kid was an honor student. Things like this scare the crap out of me. My wife is a teacher in an alternative education program. Most of the students are good kids, but some of them are certainly not. A number of them have police records. There is one that got a three day vacation thanks to her just the other day. What scares me even more that the thought of something happening to her is the thought of what I'd do as a result. :disgust:

Umm I have no idea why you quoted me in your post. Heheh, I take it that you agree with what I said then?
 
Pam Grunow's lawsuit accused Valor Corp of distributing a gun that was "unsafe, defective and lacked features that would have prevented a minor from using it." Since when is it illegal for minors to use firearms? I learned to use firearms when I was about 7-8 years old.
Exactly, the plaintiff failed materially to prove her case, but yet once again, this decision was 10% legal reasoning and 90% emotion, like most civil liability and tort awards. We feel sorry for your condition or situation, so you deserve something, whether or not the party against whom we will be awarding damages actually bears any responsibility for causing your condition. The award against the school board was even more absurd than the gun distributor, how in the hell was the school supposed to know or predict this kid's actions?
I see this getting reversed in an appeal.
Most likely, that is what has happed to virtually every other gun case of this nature. This decision was even more absurd and ripe for appeal, in that it is an impossible expectation to make a firearm which cannot be fired by a person dependent upon their age.

 
Originally posted by: Hamburgerpimp
I ran over 12 school kids yesterday with my car. It's Honda's fault.

Folks, that's a quality car. With a GM or a Ford, you'd only be able to run over 4, maybe 5 kids max before it kicks the bucket. That's why, once I get out of jail, I'll only buy Japanese.

 
I thought it's been clearly established that people are no longer responsible for their actions as long as you keep passing the blame...right?
 
Originally posted by: Dudd
Originally posted by: Hamburgerpimp
I ran over 12 school kids yesterday with my car. It's Honda's fault.

Folks, that's a quality car. With a GM or a Ford, you'd only be able to run over 4, maybe 5 kids max before it kicks the bucket. That's why, once I get out of jail, I'll only buy Japanese.

LMFAO!
 
The same stupid people that voted for this voted for Bush. 10% reason and 90% emotion. Get used to it; it's how life is. There is wisdon in the voice of the people. Your distaste for this is nothing but an emotional reaction to your so called logical thinking.
 
Originally posted by: Evadman
Originally posted by: Dudd
Originally posted by: Hamburgerpimp
I ran over 12 school kids yesterday with my car. It's Honda's fault.

Folks, that's a quality car. With a GM or a Ford, you'd only be able to run over 4, maybe 5 kids max before it kicks the bucket. That's why, once I get out of jail, I'll only buy Japanese.

LMFAO!
whut? Hondas' are made in Ohio ..you must be wanting a Subaru ..😉

 
Back
Top